When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It's only 1/25 times that it stumbles a bit when the AIR pump is running. I suppose that could be a result of a clogged cat- the air being pumped in has nowhere to go...
The muffler guy did use a heat probe to test it- it read hotter before the cat than after which he indicates is a sign of a bad cat. He clearly wasn't just trying to "sell me something" as he's the one that told me to go get it diagnosed before throwing money at it.
Air is pumped to the headers at startup to help light off the O2's and once in closed loop it should shut off. Checkvalves, where the hoses enter the headers are there to make sure that air only flows in the direction of the headers. Otherwise, there would be an exhaust leak that would suck in air when it wasn't needed and that would cause the O2'a to sense a lean condition. With the O2's sending a lean signal, the ECM is going to add a bunch of fuel it doesn't need making the mix too rich. You check them by removing them - just blow into them from each side. A scan would pick this up also. If fuel delivery (Block Learn) is trending lean, you can clamp off the hoses and see if it swings the other way. If it does, the checkvalve(s) is probably shot.
From: Overwhelmed as one would be, placed in my position.... DFW, TX
St. Jude Donor '05
Now THAT sounds reasonable! I think we're making progress here.
According to the link in my original post, high HC levels are the result of running too rich or too lean.
High CO is the result of running too rich.
My car has both issues, in addition to the NOX problem.
If the check valve is leaking, the engine would be running rich which would be the cause of my burned-out cat.
Car goes in tomorrow for testing- I'll make sure they check it.
Last year my C4 (87) failed smog here in CA for the same thing. My pre-cats were non functional, gave me better performance and milage w/o them but had to buy a new head pipe w/ pre cats and the car passed smog better than factory w/ 100K miles on it. I had already installed new cat and mufflers previously except for the pre cats. I passed the smog test and now my milage suffers a little bit. I considered putting back on the old pipe but that too much work every two years for smogging the car.
As for cutting the pipes off would be good for performance but will never pass smog since I was told by GM they are part of burning off the gases. Good Luck!
What vehicle are we talking about? The codes in OBDI are different from OBDII. The OP has a 94 OBDI.
Since you know all about these cars, you know an '88 is the older OBD1. I checked and code #13 is indeed the O2 sensor. Can you answer my last question as to how code #13 led to the diagnosis of the bad cat?
Since you know all about these cars, you know an '88 is the older OBD1. I checked and code #13 is indeed the O2 sensor. Can you answer my last question as to how code #13 led to the diagnosis of the bad cat?
The two are not related as far as I can see. The person doing the trouble shooting thinks O2 sensors sense flow so his thinking is already flawed.
I asked you what car you have because your profile is blank and you have a GS imitation for an avatar.
High NOx emissions are the result of high combustion chamber temps.
I fought the same battle and ultimately changed plugs to a colder range. Car passed with flying colors. I don't know for absolutes if that is the ultimate fix but it worked for me.
I have a great deal more than you do! Show me one thing I said that was wrong. I now return this hijacked thread to the OP.
You said I was wrong. And, since you know more than I.....I stated early on in my first explanation back to you about my experience with my '88 and what I was told by the dealer at that time. BTW, I gave you the year of the car in that post which you apparently did not read fully. I never claimed to know a whole lot about the system other than what I've been told and have gathered in the years I've owned Vettes. I'm not saying that you have said anything "wrong". I am saying that when asked a direct question you have danced around and been totally evasive. So, I'll ask you one more time. Why did the dash light come on when it did (days before hard starting and noticeable loss of power), read a code #13 for the dealer that led to being diagnosed as a bad cat?
You said I was wrong. And, since you know more than I.....I stated early on in my first explanation back to you about my experience with my '88 and what I was told by the dealer at that time. BTW, I gave you the year of the car in that post which you apparently did not read fully. I never claimed to know a whole lot about the system other than what I've been told and have gathered in the years I've owned Vettes. I'm not saying that you have said anything "wrong". I am saying that when asked a direct question you have danced around and been totally evasive. So, I'll ask you one more time. Why did the dash light come on when it did (days before hard starting and noticeable loss of power), read a code #13 for the dealer that led to being diagnosed as a bad cat?
Incorrect. The air helps warm up the cats. O2 sensors are electrically heated on a 94.
Go out and look at your headers (assuming they're stock) - modern cats don't need air - and if they did, say like the L98's, there would be a direct connection. Now what's passing through the headers eventually reaches the CAT but your '94 has an electric pump to assist those heated O2's - so do a lot of cars. The sooner you get to Closed Loop the better the Emissions.
From: Overwhelmed as one would be, placed in my position.... DFW, TX
St. Jude Donor '05
Oh dear... Look what I started.
Took the car to GM, they came back indicating that the ONLY thing that appears to be faulty are the cats. They connected it to some scan machine and indicated that everything was clean except code 420 which they said means the cats are shot. The SM told me that they checked the EGR valve and it was fine. When I indicated that cats generally do "go bad", he said that the car really did test out just fine.
Ooookay...
So I went to the muffler place to have new cats welded in. when the cut them off, I took a gander. One of them seemed to be in poor condition, but I could see daylight through the honecombs. The other one... about have the catalyst was gone... Yeah, definately toast.
It goes back for testing this evening- we'll see if it passes. If it doesn't pass with flying colors, I'm going to pay the SM at the dealer a nasty visit.
Go out and look at your headers (assuming they're stock) - modern cats don't need air - and if they did, say like the L98's, there would be a direct connection. Now what's passing through the headers eventually reaches the CAT but your '94 has an electric pump to assist those heated O2's - so do a lot of cars. The sooner you get to Closed Loop the better the Emissions.
What I quoted is direct from the FSM. Where do you think that air ends up. In the cats. The air added does nothing to the O2 sensors.