When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
looks muuuuuch better with the spacers, that is a common shortcoming when guys use c5 wheels on a c4, they ALWAYS sit way to far in. a simple spacer and it looks meant for the car......nice!
Whenver I see that it reminds me of a 70's Winnebago.
Bubba, Like Calderone said, you need to take off those spacers and use "Adapters"
Adapters have their own Studs and mine were actually 1/2" thick and I had to buy new lug nuts......I also had to buy acorn nuts to go on the original studs that are on my hubs.
Yes....if your studs stick out farther than the adapters, hopefully your wheel has a "pocket" in the inside of the hub in order to accommodate it....if not then you need to grind off the stud
Notice how your hub has a centering shoulder that your spacer is using....but the spacer has no centering feature.....It's called "hub centric" The adapter you need will have a hub centric shoulder for your wheel to nestle into.
Last edited by jhammons01; Mar 16, 2010 at 11:50 AM.
Bubba, Like Calderone said, you need to take off those spacers and use "Adapters"
Adapters have their own Studs and mine were actually 1/2" thick and I had to buy new lug nuts......I also had to buy acorn nuts to go on the original studs that are on my hubs.
Yes....if your studs stick out farther than the adapters, hopefully your wheel has a "pocket" in the inside of the hub in order to accommodate it....if not then you need to grind off the stud
Notice how your hub has a centering shoulder that your spacer is using....but the spacer has no centering feature.....It's called "hub centric" The adapter you need will have a hub centric shoulder for your wheel to nestle into.
Again, to the shopper, be aware that that the manufacturers of these parts use a different definition. So, to aid in your search...
Please go to these links and note that they look identical but serve a very different purpose (read the descriptions to the right of the green "Cart" icon)
^^Well then I am confused......I heard that the "spacer" was just what Bubba pictured....a drilled/machined piece of Alloy that had no studs and you were to use longer studs
And an adapter had Studs...you bolt the piece to your hub and then it had other studs to go into you lug holes.
Whatever you call them, I was told that the "one without a stud" was dangerous.
^^Well then I am confused......I heard that the "spacer" was just what Bubba pictured....a drilled/machined piece of Alloy that had no studs and you were to use longer studs
And an adapter had Studs...you bolt the piece to your hub and then it had other studs to go into you lug holes.
Whatever you call them, I was told that the "one without a stud" was dangerous.
That is correct, I would not use "one without a stud" for any REAL thickness. I run a 1/8" bolt through spacer on the passenger side just for an extra bit of clearance on the suspension side.
but to the question of spacer v adapter...
An adapter HAS to bolt on and have its own studs to do what it does, allow you to run a wheel with a different bolt pattern than your hub, where a spacer can be two styles, the plate that you bolt through or the studded bolt-on style.
And please understand I'm not trying to say somebody is wrong or pick on anyone, just clarifying for the OP when it comes time to go shopping. In the context of the conversation, we all understand what difference is meant by spacer v. adapter (nobody is suggesting putting Ford wheels on the Vette).
A search for "wheel adapter" on a vendor site may cause confusion and get frustrating.
And please understand I'm not trying to say somebody is wrong or pick on anyone, just clarifying for the OP when it comes time to go shopping. In the context of the conversation, we all understand what difference is meant by spacer v. adapter (nobody is suggesting putting Ford wheels on the Vette). .
At first I thought so, but then as I clicked your links....I realized that you were making perfect sense and that there is something wrong with the Vernacular that may need to be addressed.
How do you differentiate between the two styles of "Spacers"??
.....and "Adapter" should mean you are "adapting" your stud pattern for another size of bolt hole pattern.
At first I thought so, but then as I clicked your links....I realized that you were making perfect sense and that there is something wrong with the Vernacular that may need to be addressed.
How do you differentiate between the two styles of "Spacers"??
.....and "Adapter" should mean you are "adapting" your stud pattern for another size of bolt hole pattern.
I wish there was a defined way but from what I can tell there is no real word being used. The easiest I can think of is "plate" vs "studded" spacer.
And like I said, if someone says on this site says "use an adapter, not a spacer" most know what is meant, that we are simply referring to a different style of spacer, the vernacular is only a problem when it comes time for someone new to the game to go shopping.
Good for MAM, the problem is the manufacturers use adapter to mean a change in the bolt pattern and spacer to change stance
So then Calderone, if an adapter only changes stance, than what shall we refer to a thingy with studs that adapts wheels of different bolt pattern to a hub?
My point is they serve two different purposes and should be referred to differently to avoid confusion.
Did you click on the links to Summit I provided in an earlier post?
Steve you are 100% right !
Adapters are used in both ways and yes they should be referred differently
but there is nothing we can do about it, since people knows them by different names.
The "plate" vs "studded" spacer is good too.
Yes i clicked the summit links and they say "spacer" to the studded thing as well.
IMO there are 2 kinds of adapters,from same bolt pattern to same bolt pattern
and from one bolt pattern to another,both has studs.
Spacers are the ones with no studs.
But an adapter from same bolt pattern to bolt pattern works more like a spacer than a real adapter
Last edited by Calderone; Mar 16, 2010 at 02:56 PM.
Steve you are 100% right !
Adapters are used in both ways and yes they should be referred differently
but there is nothing we can do about it, since people knows them by different names.
The "plate" vs "studded" spacer is good too.
Yes i clicked the summit links and they say "spacer" to the studded thing as well.
IMO there are 2 kinds of adapters,from same bolt pattern to same bolt pattern
and from one bolt pattern to another,both has studs.
Spacers are the ones with no studs.
But an adapter from same bolt pattern to bolt pattern works more like a spacer than a real adapter
See that's where it gets ugly, do we define by appearance or purpose? IMO... purpose wins the day.
If by purpose then there two kinds of spacers (plate and studded) and an adapter is something different, no matter how much it looks like a studded spacer.
It's never finished...............It is never ending though. Car looks good!
Yep, I had a couple of fox-body mustang gts that I put a bunch of money into, so when I got the vette, I was so happy I wasn't going to have to mod it cause it was already fast, low, and had wide tires. It didn't take long to start throwing money at it. Funny how that works:o
Did they have other offsets to offer or did you buy the only offset they had??
Yep, bought them w/ the wrong offset 58mm
I think that was the only offset they had for that style, but I remember seeing an auction on eBay (different company) that had new ones with the 56mm offset, but that auction had ended and wasn't relisted. I'm happy in the end, but like I said, hindsights 20/20.
Funny how something so small makes such a difference in the way it looks. Bringing the wheels out to the corners like that looks good and well worth the effort.