When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Since the rear main seal is leaking like crazy on my '95 and needs to be replaced, I have been gathering info and this lead me to these beam plates.
They seem to be a good idea...but $189 for the set!!!!....can someone explain to me how these could cost this much???
Since the rear main seal is leaking like crazy on my '95 and needs to be replaced, I have been gathering info and this lead me to these beam plates.
They seem to be a good idea...but $189 for the set!!!!....can someone explain to me how these could cost this much???
I understand sole source, limited demand, material cost, time/labor....but when I first saw these I thought the "1" was a typo...and they were $89...which still seems steep to me for what they are.
And I do not want to affend ZF Doc in any way....just trying to make sure I am not missing something here.
I will probably pass on these as I hope to only have to be taking this apart one time only.
I manufacture several items for 53-55's. Some C4 items as well.
What people don't understand is that it takes a lot of $$$, time and effort to manufacture and market a product. No one seems to want to pay for that expertise.
IF IT WAS EASY, EVERYONE WOULD MAKE THINGS THEMSELVES.
Last edited by Vette Daddy; Dec 1, 2011 at 04:11 PM.
American owned, The product is Amercan made, The product has a Lifetime warrenty, The business is a Home business, Quality stainless steel is used that is tig welded for safety, its a mod that works and lastly Because you didnt have to make it.
These above reasons would be my best guess?
Choose one
Last edited by Goldcylon; Dec 1, 2011 at 06:25 PM.
If they did nothing but ease removal and reinstallation of the beam plates, they're worth the $150 I paid for them 6 years ago. I have not so skinny hands and fingers, and those plates make fussing with that C-beam a piece o' cake!
Later, when I traded for my ZR-1, I noticed the rear would kick out and squirm a bit at WOT. First time I removed the C-beam, I noticed the bolt holes over the differential were oval. Obviously, the diff was hammering the C-beam pretty good! The beam plates took care of that.
Stainless is easy to weld, IMO. If you're handy with tools and such, I suppose you could fab up your own. But, Bill B is a good guy and has helped me out a couple times. So, I didn't mind paying his price. I felt the relationship was worth it. Sometimes we have to support those that support us, I recon!
I thought I answered this before, but oh well, Bill B. has designed a great part for the C4 C-Beam. Look at it closely and you will see why it works so well. They say it strengthens the connection between the differential and the C-beam and the transmission. But the best advantage of these plates is the ease of installation of the C-beam. Why didn't GM design the connections better? Probably because the drive train was assembled before the body went on and acess to the bolts and nuts was not a problem. Worth the money? Absolutely.
I manufacture several items for 53-55's. Some C4 items as well.
What people don't understand is that it takes a lot of $$$, time and effort to manufacture and market a product. No one seems to want to pay for that expertise.
IF IT WAS EASY, EVERYONE WOULD MAKE THINGS THEMSELVES.
They make the dissassembly and assembly extremely easy.
I had my ZF done by the zfdoc himself and paid somewhat less than $180 for those beam plates, but maybe it was because I already had a trans job on the plate and there was no shipping involved.
They are kind of overbuilt- way nicer than the mass produced parts from GM no doubt. I was happy to install them on my low mile 91 before the beam got loose and hogged out the holes and wore against the trans and diff flanges.
I understand that the beam plates are an upgrade and can improve the rigidness (is that a word) of the connections. And for sure an great improvement with regards to ease of assembly and dis-assembly.
I expect (and hope) to only have to do this job once, although I am still debating whether to get these or not.
Thanks to everyone for their responses....really good reading and information.
I especially like the response, "...guess most of my car could be considered a beam plate..." got a good laugh out of that one....
From: Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
St. Jude '03 thru '24
Originally Posted by VetteMed
I just had the c-beam off today, and having the beam plates makes life so much easier. I consider the price well worth it.
Exactly!
Try removing and torquing those nuts without the plates.
Just one day of fighting pays for plates.
We had a GP a few years ago and the price was favorable.
I have removed the c beam in both of my cars multiple times. I tried the plates on my GS and saw no difference performance wise. It might save 5 minutes taking things apart or putting things together, but they are not worth the price to me.
I don't know, I don't have trouble with R&R of it. One of those forum things I just don't get. As to it helping make it more rigid, no, unless some of the parts are worn out from being loose to long.
Since my car isn't the holy grail, I cut access holes in the body. Super easy to get a wrench on there now. For those with carpet, you could probably make a nice cut flap and do the same.