When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I’m posting this for a friend who has an 87 coupe.
He is going to recover his seats and has a choice between the perforated and a non-perforated seating surface. They are available both ways.
What is the advantage of one over the other? His main concern is tearing between the tiny holes in the perforated type. He also wants to keep the car as original as possible.
My input was that the non-perforated seat would be really hot and sweaty.
Go for the Perfs. I found a new set on ebay and am very happy with them. Also make sure to replace the seat foams, well worth the extra bucks. :yesnod:
89 sport seats non-perforated from the factory - leather.
89 Replacement sport seats non-perforated - leather.
Non perforated can get sweaty in very muggy hot weather
Perforated will rip sooner.
Choices, choices.
Pete
Perforated will rip sooner
- not necessarily true - the original seats in my '85 (17 year old standard-perforated) have yet to rip. i agree, that the non-perforated may be slightly hotter/muggy.