When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Havent posted in a while, as most of my concerns are covered in the search sections of the forums. Although my 94 six speed coupe has yet to let me down, I know that I am on borrowed time. When that time arrives, I know that the forums and a recently purchased FSM will get me through. How much of that borrowed time I have left is uncertain, but the way it starts right up and behaves now leads me to believe I have many more seasons of trouble free miles ahead. Unless I do something stupid like I have done before, see my previous posts about VATS and a run in with an aftermarket alarm, I think this era of our Corvettes our amazingly reliable and trouble free. Will others chime in and echo my beliefs on long lasting reliability?
When many automotive journalists and critics talk about the Corvette, and how the Porshce is better because X, or the BMW is better because Y, the one thing they always seem to leave out is the longevity and reliability of the Cheverolet Corvette. From the first V8 model in 1955? until the most recent generation, the Corvette has simply been the best performance car you can still drive to work everyday.
P.S. 150K mile '96 here. No major repairs that I did not create the need for.
Yes the vettes are very reliable until you modify them, i had my vette in standard form the first 10 years and it never let me down.
Then i modified it of course more h/p means you have to replace everything downstream, now she is reliable again after all the weak bits had been destroyed and replaced with expensive heavy duty items.
It also means half any life expectancy of expensive heavy duty running gear afterwards. but you cannot expect anything to last forever hey
I have owned a lot of cars, and very few are without their peccadillos. My current Honda Accord seems to be bulletproof and is an amazing car, but overall they have their quirks (bad power windows, bad trans in the V6 models, paint, rust..)
I usually join a forum for all the cars I own. So I get to hear a lot. The Corvette is no better and certainly no worse than any other car I have owned where its weaknesses are concerned.
I have had a couple of C4's ("88 A4 and '94 6M) that I daily drove and put about 100k miles combined for the 5 years I had those two cars. I sold the '88 at 115k and the '94 at 145k miles, so they were moderately high mile cars.
Both of them were great. I never had any major problems. The only maintenance (other than fluids, filters, tires etc) I had over that time period was an EGR valve on the '88 and a wheel bearing on the '94.
With so few problems, good gas mileage, and almost no depreciation during the time I owned them, they were about the least expensive vehicles I have ever owned. And fun too.
Yes the vettes are very reliable until you modify them, i had my vette in standard form the first 10 years and it never let me down.
Then i modified it of course more h/p means you have to replace everything downstream, now she is reliable again after all the weak bits had been destroyed and replaced with expensive heavy duty items.
It also means half any life expectancy of expensive heavy duty running gear afterwards. but you cannot expect anything to last forever hey
The worst thing I ever did was let someone (a shop I thought did good work) modify my '85 when I owned it. Expensive lesson learned. Stock from now on.
I've got 115k on my stock '92 M6, it drives great and the only thing that needed replacement was the water pump, which is expected. I'm definitely going electric next time around.
I daily drive it and beat the hell out of it too, no problems yet!
I wish. Mine has had electrical problems one after another. I wish I was good at electronics, I'd gut the inside and rewire this whole damn thing (half way there already)!
m 94 6spd is bone stock other than a vortex ram air intake duct. it has 103k miles and based on personal repair and knowledge of the ownership of the car the only parts other than brakes, wipers, oil filter, fuel filter, air filter, coolant, battery and tires have been replaced:
-clutch set
-clutch slave cylinder
-opti
-plugs
-wires
-ICM
-coil
-serpentine belt
-horn set
-battery terminal bolts
-rear monoleaf spring (aftermarket unit was installed. perhaps not due to failure but for better performance)
everything else is original. the engine runs perfect and the trans shifts like it was new. all of the original gaskets and seals, wheel bearings, alternator, starter, headlight bulbs, etc have never been touched. i would trust the car on a trip to California!
I think I am the 3rd or 4th owner. I know one of them put some crap shocks on which I immediately swapped out for some QA1's. Everything has been going great until recently when my minor oil leak decided to become a MAJOR oil leak. Not sure where it is yet (see most recent post). Until now, it was my daily driver and I loved every second of it.
I disagree that a modded car isn't very reliable. If it's modified with the proper components and the entire drivetrain is upgraded to handle the added power they can be almost as reliable as a stock car.. I think most would agree that the new 638 hp ZR-1s are fairly reliable, the reason being, the drivetrain is built to handle the load ..If you just put in an engine with 400-450hp and change nothing else, your asking for ( and will get) a breakdown. But upgrade the trans to a stage 2 , put in a D44 rear and upgrade the cooling system and you have a car that will handle the new power upgrade without problems. My 89 has around 400hp with everything else above done, and I would take it anywhere without hesitation. I will agree that once you get up around and over 500hp on our small block chevy engines, the fact that you have components that are ment strickly for racing diminishes the reliabiliy substantially..Just my opinion.......WW
I disagree that a modded car isn't very reliable. If it's modified with the proper components and the entire drivetrain is upgraded to handle the added power they can be almost as reliable as a stock car.. I think most would agree that the new 638 hp ZR-1s are fairly reliable, the reason being, the drivetrain is built to handle the load ..If you just put in an engine with 400-450hp and change nothing else, your asking for ( and will get) a breakdown. But upgrade the trans to a stage 2 , put in a D44 rear and upgrade the cooling system and you have a car that will handle the new power upgrade without problems. My 89 has around 400hp with everything else above done, and I would take it anywhere without hesitation. I will agree that once you get up around and over 500hp on our small block chevy engines, the fact that you have components that are ment strickly for racing diminishes the reliabiliy substantially..Just my opinion.......WW
I would have to agree. If for no other reason than just the fact that one is replacing 17-30 year old parts with new(er) ones. Add to that performance parts, (at least good ones) are typically made from stronger materials, higher specs and so forth. But like you said, the car is only as strong as it's weakest part. I want to have my heads ported and reworked, but before I do that, I am going to refresh the drivetrain. Clutch, u-joints, suspension. Because adding power to a weak clutch assembly and u-joints is just asking for trouble. Though I think alot of the 'reliability' problems in modded cars is less how they're built, but how they're driven.