why so many automatic c4's?
I am discovering my 93 6spd convertible seems to be a rare car.
I imagine if you were shopping for miata's or honda s2000 you'd be hard pressed to find an automatic (did they even make one)?
Heres some of my speculation:
1. The 4 speed auto in the c4 was the first time GM got an automatic transmission, in a sports car, right so every one wanted it.
2. The goofy 4+3 manual transmission gave everyone a bad-taste-in-their mouth towards manuals of any sort (Even the improved ZF6).
3. Lazy, older corvette drivers thought the cars were a subsitute for 'cadillac's ' and didnt want to be shifting gears.
This is not meant as a dog in anyway against the automatic (which im convinced are faster during drag races).
It does seem the 6spd's made a come back in the c5 and c6 (Esp. the verts.
Not only that, but GM seemed to be suffering an identity crisis during the 80s. They were trying to make both cheap econo cars, and quality cars like the Camaro and the Corvette.
Most people have little or no higher brain functions, and thus the manual at the time was considered undesirable with those two factors in.
The ZF6, wasn't what I'd call a stellar transmission either, not with the T56 that came out in short order after that. (Why the vette didn't get an IMMEDIATE retrofit for the T56 I don't understand at all seeing as how the F Cars got it as soon as GM picked it up in 93)
I've given up hope of ever scoring a manual 89 C4. (my favorite year of C4) My next stick car will be either a Gen 4 F Car, or a C5.
Much much easier to find, and the transmission itself is worlds beyond the ZF.
I am discovering my 93 6spd convertible seems to be a rare car.
I imagine if you were shopping for miata's or honda s2000 you'd be hard pressed to find an automatic (did they even make one)?
Heres some of my speculation:
1. The 4 speed auto in the c4 was the first time GM got an automatic transmission, in a sports car, right so every one wanted it.
2. The goofy 4+3 manual transmission gave everyone a bad-taste-in-their mouth towards manuals of any sort (Even the improved ZF6).
3. Lazy, older corvette drivers thought the cars were a subsitute for 'cadillac's ' and didnt want to be shifting gears.
This is not meant as a dog in anyway against the automatic (which im convinced are faster during drag races).
It does seem the 6spd's made a come back in the c5 and c6 (Esp. the verts.
Quite a few Miatas and s200s come with automatics, but they tend to be in pastel colors!
Last edited by zr1fred; Mar 25, 2013 at 11:34 AM.

I also seldom use my Air Conditioning, (I have windows... and a removable roof. Unless it's raining I have no reason to use it... besides it's not like the AC does much to actually -make the car cold- in a Southern Summer with a glass roof)
The 4+3 was created primarily to solve the CAFE requirements from the early 80's The Borg-Warner Super T-10 had been around for years and was well-known for it's strength behind high HP motors. But the gas mileage averages had to be met. The T-5 that was used in F-bodies and Mustangs of the early 80's simply didn't have the strength. And the design of that trans would have been a problem in terms of the C-beam mounting, shifter location and angle and changing the 5th gear ratio.
GM had a good auto trans in Corvettes The TH350 and TH400 versions worked well behind GM performance cars including the Camaro, Firebird, the various muscle cars of the 60's and early 70's.
2. The goofy 4+3 manual transmission gave everyone a bad-taste-in-their mouth towards manuals of any sort (Even the improved ZF6).
3. Lazy, older corvette drivers thought the cars were a subsitute for 'cadillac's ' and didnt want to be shifting gears.
This is not meant as a dog in anyway against the automatic (which im convinced are faster during drag races).
2. I agree that the 4+3 was weird, but it met the criteria. I think a T5 would have been a better option
3. I agree that MOST Amercian drivers are lazy, and that contributes to the plethora of auto shifted vehicles. Try finding a 1/2 ton truck w/a stick anymore. Doesn't exist.

3a. Auto's are faster at the drags, ONLY when you get to the point where the time spent w/the clutch in, outweighs the inefficiencies of the auto trans. IOW, slower cars go faster w/sticks, and fast cars go faster w/autos, simply b/c it's harder to manage the events happening at those speeds, perfectly and repeatedly. But a stock LT1 auto won't be faster than a stock LT1 stick, for example. OTOH, the "average 'merican" will probably go down the track quicker w/an auto.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts






He stated that American car buyers liked the convenience and luxury of not having to clutch and shift anymore.
Lazy? A little of that but I think most people like to pamper themselves with a little luxury here and there.
Finally got to drive further than down the block this weekend and I'm loving the change. My 12 YR old son really loves the difference in power. Anyhow, I got my 2012 SRT Superbee with paddleshifters for my automatic.
Ultimately, I wanted a different driving experience and now I've got it.
A stick is absolutely, hands down, a simpler, more reliable mechanical system.
I also don't consider auto shift feature to be "luxurious". A stick CAN be driven more seamlessly than an auto. To me, it makes no difference in "luxury" but auto brings the car one step closer to being an appliance, rather than a toy or recreational item.





And that trend continues today, probably even more so.
Lots more automatic Corvettes out there than manual versions.
1. lack of an OD
2. wasted a lot of energy thru the torque converter.
I wonder if the 700R4 wastes less energy thru the TQ converter.
Apparently even 700R4 leaves room for improvement as GM has went to 6 speed automatics. Theres even talk about bringing back clutch style sequential manual transmissions (that can be set to shift automatically) to ditch the power robbing Torque conveter
I also seldom use my Air Conditioning, (I have windows... and a removable roof. Unless it's raining I have no reason to use it... besides it's not like the AC does much to actually -make the car cold- in a Southern Summer with a glass roof)
Ive happily ditched the A/C, and power seats (in favor of manual sliders) on my vert.
Ive come to the conclusion the top should be down if Im driving it at which point A/C doesnt make sense.
Of course a summer rainstorm makes A/C useful, but then again those rainstorms are so short-lived that the windows/top are back down again with the sun shining/ birds chirping like nothing ever happened just as soon as the rainstorm started.
A stick is absolutely, hands down, a simpler, more reliable mechanical system.
I also don't consider auto shift feature to be "luxurious". A stick CAN be driven more seamlessly than an auto. To me, it makes no difference in "luxury" but auto brings the car one step closer to being an appliance, rather than a toy or recreational item.
Yeah seriously. I'm just speaking from personal experience. I've never had or known anyone who has had an auto transmission fail them. I drive my cars everyday not on weekends or for a trip to the drag strip once a month. I know a manual is better for strength and hard driving I don't care I could take it or leave it. I would buy a C6ZO6 in a heart beat if I could afford it and probably the new 7 speed in the C7. But for a used vette no way I'm getting a stick.
Well you do now. Hi. I'm Tom. I've had many, many auto trans's fail on me. I've had GF's who had auto cars that the trans's failed on, parents, friends...my best friend, Dan, his Ford F250 just left him stranded at his x-wife's house last week while he was trying to pick up his daughter. Awkward. If you don't know anyone who has lost an auto trans...you are in the VAST minority.
Me and sticks? Never been stranded. Closest I came was towing my boat from CO to Maine a couple summers ago. My 160,000 mile clutch was weak, and I knew it (remember what I said about a clutch giving warning?). I went anyway, and when we got about 1/2 way through Nebraska where there was lower elevation/more air=more tq, my clutch started slipping when the the cruise control throttled the engine. Still, I was able to drive from Nebraska to Maine towing my boat, even by using the throttle very carefully.
I'm going to go ahead and say that your isolated experiences have caused you to create a peculiar and unique opinion. You're certainly entitled to it though!
You don't know anyone who has had an auto trans fail on them? Do you know...ANYONE?
Well you do now. Hi. I'm Tom. I've had many, many auto trans's fail on me. I've had GF's who had auto cars that the trans's failed on, parents, friends...my best friend, Dan, his Ford F250 just left him stranded at his x-wife's house last week while he was trying to pick up his daughter. Awkward. If you don't know anyone who has lost an auto trans...you are in the VAST minority.
Me and sticks? Never been stranded. Closest I came was towing my boat from CO to Maine a couple summers ago. My 160,000 mile clutch was weak, and I knew it (remember what I said about a clutch giving warning?). I went anyway, and when we got about 1/2 way through Nebraska where there was lower elevation/more air=more tq, my clutch started slipping when the the cruise control throttled the engine. Still, I was able to drive from Nebraska to Maine towing my boat, even by using the throttle very carefully.
I'm going to go ahead and say that your isolated experiences have caused you to create a peculiar and unique opinion. You're certainly entitled to it though!

Now I do haha. Like I said it 's just my personal experience. Give me another 20 years and I'm sure I'll have a different story. You guys are really making me want to get a manual in my next vette
I guess I've just never driven an excellent manual car.
















