C4 General Discussion General C4 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech

Front Stabilizer "Link Bushing" help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 4, 2014 | 05:05 PM
  #1  
Bryan K's Avatar
Bryan K
Thread Starter
3rd Gear
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default Front Stabilizer "Link Bushing" help

Trying to replace the lower front stabilizer shaft bushing on my 1993 coupe and ordered the bushing through my local GM dealership. The GM parts diagram lists the upper (part #21) and lower insulator (part #49) as part # 14084097 for both. I believe they should be different as the upper is "beveled" to press into the stabilizer bar end, and the lower that fits into the lower control arm should be different. Can someone please shed some light and advise if this is correct. Thanks in advance!

Bryan
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2014 | 07:18 PM
  #2  
WVZR-1's Avatar
WVZR-1
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Veteran: Army
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,378
Likes: 2,735
Default

12521520 is the correct part # for the lower but it's been NLA for quite some time. You might try the numbers that he sold you but I don't recall them being the same 'dimensionally', I've never measured but the through bolts upper and lower are the same I'm quite sure.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2014 | 09:06 PM
  #3  
Bryan K's Avatar
Bryan K
Thread Starter
3rd Gear
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default

tried it and it does not fit.... it is slightly larger. Any recommendation on where i can get the correct one. And why would the GM parts diagram list them incorrectly. Checked tonkin GM parts and they list both as an"upper"....
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2014 | 03:51 AM
  #4  
WVZR-1's Avatar
WVZR-1
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Veteran: Army
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,378
Likes: 2,735
Default

Originally Posted by Bryan K
tried it and it does not fit.... it is slightly larger. Any recommendation on where i can get the correct one. And why would the GM parts diagram list them incorrectly. Checked tonkin GM parts and they list both as an"upper"....
Dimensionally what is the difference? Could the LCA be 'reamed' for the upper to fit? I understand the desire to use OE metal clad replacements so I'd maybe consider that.

If the dealer has the bushings for the rear measure those maybe for comparison's sake. That number is 14060114.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2014 | 04:02 PM
  #5  
Bryan K's Avatar
Bryan K
Thread Starter
3rd Gear
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default

The OD is larger on the lower than the upper and i really dont want to mess with the lower control arm. I personally like the metal clad bushings but may try a set of Poly bushings from Ecklers. What do you think? Are they any good, and can anyone reccomend another source.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2025 | 07:17 PM
  #6  
detroitrust's Avatar
detroitrust
Racer
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 483
Likes: 157
Default

Okay, this post is 10 years old, but the car issues remain relevant as long as they are on the road.

I asked basically the same question a couple days ago but got almost nowhere. I also want to replace the upper and lower stabilizer bushings and am looking to the supply vendors for clarification. I'm finding they are basically clueless.

I do know the lowers are sleeved using a smooth metal case pressed in until the collar hits. The original uppers are segmented to indicate the depth they are pushed into the sway bar (13mm). Rubber is the oem material. Lots of vendors say the bushings they sell are "rubber" as well as the large sway bar to frame bushings, calling them "rubber". I got a couple "rubber" bushings from Ramcoa, but they certainly look and feel like polyethylene.

To the point of the original post; I have measured the upper an lower stabilizer bushings while in place and found them to be identical dimensionally. This is opposed to the original poster. With 17k miles, I have to assume my components are oem. I will pull both to make a final comparison and report. If the same, we should be good to go with a single part number instead of wrestling with the separate numbers.

I guess this only appeals to those replacing front sway bar components.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2025 | 02:54 AM
  #7  
PSYDUCK's Avatar
PSYDUCK
Cruising
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Nov 2023
Posts: 13
Likes: 11
Default

Originally Posted by detroitrust
Okay, this post is 10 years old, but the car issues remain relevant as long as they are on the road.

I asked basically the same question a couple days ago but got almost nowhere. I also want to replace the upper and lower stabilizer bushings and am looking to the supply vendors for clarification. I'm finding they are basically clueless.

I do know the lowers are sleeved using a smooth metal case pressed in until the collar hits. The original uppers are segmented to indicate the depth they are pushed into the sway bar (13mm). Rubber is the oem material. Lots of vendors say the bushings they sell are "rubber" as well as the large sway bar to frame bushings, calling them "rubber". I got a couple "rubber" bushings from Ramcoa, but they certainly look and feel like polyethylene.

To the point of the original post; I have measured the upper an lower stabilizer bushings while in place and found them to be identical dimensionally. This is opposed to the original poster. With 17k miles, I have to assume my components are oem. I will pull both to make a final comparison and report. If the same, we should be good to go with a single part number instead of wrestling with the separate numbers.

I guess this only appeals to those replacing front sway bar components.
I hate to raise a post from the dead but I'm wondering if you got anywhere with this? I'm in the process of rebuilding the front end and I have all bushes ready to go, but this one!
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Front Stabilizer "Link Bushing" help





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:37 PM.

story-0
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-2
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE