When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'll see if I can find the link that one of the sponsors, a pro tuner, posted. But, IIRC, the apex of the bell curve (dozens of LT4s) was closer to 350 hp (derived by unknown correction for drivetrain losses) with one as low as 320 and a couple crowding the 375 hp.
It wouldn't be the first time GM understated engine performance for whatever reason, and it certainly would not bode well if the outgoing 96 C4s were at parity with the new LS1s (which they were, apparently).
The fact that the article quoted performances calculated from inertia dyno results is one place where results could be skewed considerably, depending on driveline loss assumptions.
Anywayz... This topic is always good for some lively discussion. The way to know is to put yours on the dyno and see what is what! No?
Last edited by Paul Workman; Aug 19, 2014 at 11:32 AM.
Never had mine on the dyno. Where I did see evidence of the LT4s improvements in real world numbers was at the track.
Out of the box, it ran four-tenths of a second & six mph faster than the ’94 6-speed LT1 I traded in for the 4.
Still wasn't fast enough to beat the ’04 C5 Z06 in the lane next to me though. Guy picked up his Z06 at the Museum, stopped at the strip on his way home from Bowling Green, ran 12.5 @ 111 on his first run. Ah, the good ’ol days.
From: SCMR Rat Pack'r Charter Member..Great Bend KS
One morning some years ago, a friend with a one-year old C5 (345hp/MN6) and I put our cars on a chassis dyno. His peaked at 314rwhp. Mine at 311rwhp. Both engines were stock.