When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Finally got it fixed! Had a good old school mechanic check it all over and everything was good...grounds fuel spark, etc. but no injector pulses. Called Jim's performance in Maryland, and he talked to my mechanic for almost an hour helping him double check everything...MAF you name it still no pulses! At first Jim was pretty adamant it wasn't the VATS because the starter would turn over but no injector pulses. He said VATS would not allow the starter to crank. After going through everything with my mechanics he agreed that the VATS was the only possible problem. We sent him the chip and he eliminated the Vats from the computer program now it starts every time. Funny thing is now my power antenna will not go down. I hear the motor running but it won't return the antenna to the down position. This experience was a very costly one for me but hopefully it will help others out there that run into the same problem. i highly recommend Jim he is an outstanding individual, talking to me for 20 minutes and my mechanic for nearly an hour and would not accept any reimbursement when i offered it!
If you had checked the error codes like I suggested back in post #37, the ECM would have told you it was a VATS problem (error code 46).
If you had checked the error codes like I suggested back in post #37, the ECM would have told you it was a VATS problem (error code 46).
Wow I am amazed at the smug know it all posts of a few people on this board! I already posted that everything checked out ok......including the codes that he did run, (3 times), the last time with Jim's Performance. Never once did a code 46 show up! This was a very unique problem and proves out that things are not always as straight forward and "matter of fact" when dealing with these computer systems. Jim is supposed to be very knowledgeable and even he was stymied! He concluded it had to be the vats even though there was no error code 46 and the injectors still would not pulse even though all other checks proved out ok.
One thing I didn't mention in the above is that yes it will crank and not fire the injectors in the above scenario BUT it should still set a code in the ecm for a vats problem. Not sure if for some reason his isn't or he didn't check the codes. Wasn't there so cant guess more than that.
Believe me, I am keeping an open mind and I'm not doubting the experience of Jim or his abilities, I've got an 88 with a similar intermittent no cranking issue, so I'm trying to learn as much as I can.
I don't think you understood my question.
As far as I know (anybody please feel free to correct me if I wrong) VATS cuts the power to both the starter and the injectors, not one or the other, but both at the same time.
So if it was genuinely a VATS issue, first and foremost you shouldn't have been able to crank the engine over at all.
I guess the question is.. how does it do that and is it possible that one of those functions failed?
I guess the question is.. how does it do that and is it possible that one of those functions failed?
I don't know how and why all I know is that even though there was no error 46 code that eliminating the vats from the prom chip corrected a problem that had us all pulling our hair out over. ! am having fun driving it now and am very thankful to have a great dependable American sports car!
I don't know how and why all I know is that even though there was no error 46 code that eliminating the vats from the prom chip corrected a problem that had us all pulling our hair out over. ! am having fun driving it now and am very thankful to have a great dependable American sports car!
Well Im IT I can tell you this when it comes to electronics sometimes the "why" escapes us. If it works that's all that matters LOL
[QUOTE=Bandit1977;1588731852]Believe me, I am keeping an open mind and I'm not doubting the experience of Jim or his abilities, I've got an 88 with a similar intermittent no cranking issue, so I'm trying to learn as much as I can.
I don't think you understood my question.
As far as I know (anybody please feel free to correct me if I wrong) VATS cuts the power to both the starter and the injectors, not one or the other, but both at the same time.
So if it was genuinely a VATS issue, first and foremost you shouldn't have been able to crank the engine over at all.[/QUOT
in this case would the wire/defective vats need to be replaced or would just programming the vats out of the equation allow both crank spark and fuel to happen?
my understanding is that the poster had his vats removed from the software? in other words creating an ok condition, but if there was a physical gap in the signal getting through, unless the ecu can send the signal down another path it still should not start?
i think these are some of the greatest and toughest gremlins to track down!! thanks to the op for coming back and reporting his findings.
Wow I am amazed at the smug know it all posts of a few people on this board! I already posted that everything checked out ok......including the codes that he did run, (3 times), the last time with Jim's Performance. Never once did a code 46 show up! This was a very unique problem and proves out that things are not always as straight forward and "matter of fact" when dealing with these computer systems. Jim is supposed to be very knowledgeable and even he was stymied! He concluded it had to be the vats even though there was no error code 46 and the injectors still would not pulse even though all other checks proved out ok.
Sorry. I guess I missed it where you told us you checked the error codes and found none. Which post was that in? You told us in several posts that you couldn't check error codes because you didn't have a scan tool. That's why I suggested the "paperclip" method, which doesn't require a scan tool.
Also note that you can bypass the VATS starter enable relay (which is done fairly often) and the engine will crank even if there is a VATS problem:
Sorry. I guess I missed it where you told us you checked the error codes and found none. Which post was that in? You told us in several posts that you couldn't check error codes because you didn't have a scan tool. That's why I suggested the "paperclip" method, which doesn't require a scan tool.
Also note that you can bypass the VATS starter enable relay (which is done fairly often) and the engine will crank even if there is a VATS problem:
post #73......."check it all over and everything was good...grounds fuel spark, etc. but no injector pulses. Called Jim's performance in Maryland, and he talked to my mechanic for almost an hour helping him double check everything...MAF you name it still no pulses!" Didn't mention codes but "everything you name it" was meant to be all inclusive. I could have written another paragraph if I had described all he had done in depth. Actually the codes were the first thing he checked. He went through the codes with Jim on the phone also because Jim initially didn't think it could be a vats problem. Bottom line is it is irrelevant to try and debate whether or not the vats could have been the cause because the proof is in the fact that eliminating it from the chip program worked! I'm not sure circumventing the vats at the ignition would have done the same thing.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.