Winter blend fuel ...
run fuel without sucking all out when new season starts and keeps fuel fresher with no phase seperation ,no start problems and no old fuel smell when started for first time,... No carb or injector problems for me.Don't need to have carbs cleaned....
...also. But I've never even heard of "Star-tron" until this thread. What am I missing?
.
I've used Sta-Bil in some of my boats. The times I've not used it, there were no problems.
I've used race gas a few times and it seemed to hold up much better than regular fuel.
I've toyed with the idea of switching to E-85 for my boat since we have 5-10% ethanol in our fuel anyways. It's been killing fuel pumps and the rubbers in the carbs anyways, so I'm thinking of running alcohol friendly fuel lines, fuel pumps and carb setups.
In case you were asleep for eight years, it was Dubbya who put the corn in our gas while he was busy killing jobs, starting useless wars for profit, and tanking our economy. Why do you feel compelled to press your political views in this forum? Is it because you feel all Corvette owners share your view? We don't. There's plenty of bile being vented in off topic.
Ethanol free is widely available here. Colonial pipeline is still gouging us at the pump to pay for their failed maintenance in Alabama.
Winter gas huh?






As you said, "What does this mean to you? Well, unless you have an extreme tune on your car, it won’t be much of a bother."
/thread
Actually, the big change from decades ago is that the RVP is reduced for summer blends to cut down on unburned hydrocarbons from evaporation. They used to sell "winter grade" all year round cuz it is cheaper to produce.
I was told by the mechanic at the Chevrolet dealership if the car was going to sit for 30-45 days I should use double the amount. I usually run Shell premium gas so am I hurting my engine, wasting money or am I OK?
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I was told by the mechanic at the Chevrolet dealership if the car was going to sit for 30-45 days I should use double the amount. I usually run Shell premium gas so am I hurting my engine, wasting money or am I OK?
That being said, I don't think it works that way. Fuel trim will be adjusted by the ecm/pcm in an effort to maintain the stoichiometric ratio. The ecm/pcm can make no adjustments relative to power output. Instead it can only adjust for the proper air fuel ratio, and at that ratio the engine will make less power because there is less energy in the fuel. Its possible that with less energy content, less o2 will be consumed during the combustion process causing the ecm/pcm to enrich the a/f ratio and restoring normal power output. The issue I have with that is simply; its not probable based on what we all already know for certain. Obviously, when the cars are in open loop at wide open throttle (or cold) no ecm/pcm adjustments are being made and none of them from any manufacturer run too lean at these times. Also we know for certain that the "long chain" hydrocarbons normally in the fuel are replaced with butane (which is the problem in the first place) to promote cold starting (supposedly). This also has the side benefit of maintaining the proper a/f mixture during open loop at least as it relates to the fuel itself. To me, it seems impossible that a refiner would produce a fuel that would require a different a/f ratio, if nothing else, every car with a carburetor would experience drivability problems.


Off topic. No irony. No apology. Disappointing.
Just kind of started my day with a big, fat, stinking turd in a place where I normally go to find camaraderie.

Lowers my respect for C4 drivers. Done with the wave.
Ethanol free regular and premium all around the upstate, but I use the Shell Vpower. I prefer tier 1. Have not noticed any difference in MPG so far.
I don't know for certain, if this position is true, but it is my belief as I haven't been able to discern any power changes at all. My opinion has been that fuel economy drops in the winter due to colder, cold starts, longer warm up time, colder oil, trans, diff, PS fluids creating more drag. I feel that is where the meaningful losses are in the winter.
Before feedback and electronic controls they did. Hence the old spring and fall tune up ritual, which if done properly would have included jetting and choke adjustments. In reality, this probably wasn't done and cars ran "good enough" for most oblivious people.
Last edited by steven mack; Oct 15, 2016 at 01:30 PM. Reason: Add info
That being said, I don't think it works that way. Fuel trim will be adjusted by the ecm/pcm in an effort to maintain the stoichiometric ratio. The ecm/pcm can make no adjustments relative to power output. Instead it can only adjust for the proper air fuel ratio, and at that ratio the engine will make less power because there is less energy in the fuel. Its possible that with less energy content, less o2 will be consumed during the combustion process causing the ecm/pcm to enrich the a/f ratio and restoring normal power output. The issue I have with that is simply; its not probable based on what we all already know for certain. Obviously, when the cars are in open loop at wide open throttle (or cold) no ecm/pcm adjustments are being made and none of them from any manufacturer run too lean at these times. Also we know for certain that the "long chain" hydrocarbons normally in the fuel are replaced with butane (which is the problem in the first place) to promote cold starting (supposedly). This also has the side benefit of maintaining the proper a/f mixture during open loop at least as it relates to the fuel itself. To me, it seems impossible that a refiner would produce a fuel that would require a different a/f ratio, if nothing else, every car with a carburetor would experience drivability problems.

Doesn't the ECM/PCM or whatever management system only care about knock or pre-detonation? I believe rated power output is a distant fourth of fifth priority of the engine management system.
If the knock sensors detect pre-detonation, then the ECM/PCM enrich the fuel until (up to a set limit) the knock or pre-detonation stops. So if the fuel is not of the correct octane level the car will enrich the A/F ratio until pre-detonation is eliminated or a set "check engine" light is determined.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars...ence-13747431/
Mine def has more power in this cool dry air. I usually save some E85 from July as that damn gasoline content increases as it gets colder out!

Doesn't the ECM/PCM or whatever management system only care about knock or pre-detonation? I believe rated power output is a distant fourth of fifth priority of the engine management system.
If the knock sensors detect pre-detonation, then the ECM/PCM enrich the fuel until (up to a set limit) the knock or pre-detonation stops. So if the fuel is not of the correct octane level the car will enrich the A/F ratio until pre-detonation is eliminated or a set "check engine" light is determined.
What I do know is, besides the knock sensors, the other sensors such as oxygen sensors, throttle position sensor, engine coolant temperature sensor, mass airflow sensor, engine RPM etc etc... they all contribute data to the ECM/PCM to produce best power for the demand, and keep emissions as low as reasonably possible in the given situation.
On topic, I would not worry about fuel degradation over periods less than 3 months. However, I would be concerned about ethanol bringing in extra moisture when stored long-term in humid environments. Beyond 3 months, I would use a commercial fuel stabilizer. But obviously the best solution is just run the engine to full temperature periodically so things don't just sit there for extended periods. Even if it's not driven, at least running the engine periodically will stir things up and get everything flowing and hot... way better than the car being in a coma.
I don't think engine power is affected by winter fuel blends as long as the octane rating is consistent. Power may go up if the ambient temperatures are significantly cooler, but not by much (hot coolant runs through the throttle body in stock configuration). Generally, MPG will drop depending on the fuel's energy content by volume (energy content is different than octane rating).

Changing the the fuel chemistry to winter or summer blends doesn't ultimately change octane; that isn't the issue. 91 octane product in the summer should still meet the same criteria in the winter, and be a 91 octane product.
The OP is saying that the energy content (which is totally different than octane rating) is lower with winter blend. IOW, it takes a greater volume of winter blend fuel to create the same BTU's of energy than it would take summer blend. To make the same HP on winter blend, injector pulse needs to be longer (for same conditions) than with summer blend...which lowers fuel economy. Is that what happens? IDK for sure. It is my contention that the lower energy content winter blend would create a lean condition, the ECM would see that feedback from the O2's and adjust. Power would remain essentially the same, but fuel economy would suffer.
The other possibility is that the lower energy content doesn't "register" as a lean mix for the O2, and injector pulse width doesn't change (for a given condition). In that case, fuel economy wouldn't change, but power would suffer.
Which is happening? Maybe a combination of both, but I've never noticed a loss of power in the winter (SOTP) but I definitely notice a loss of fuel economy as I hand - calc every tank. That proves nothing though, as I feel there are other detractors to fuel economy than fuel type:
Cold oil, trans fluid, diff, PS oil all adds drag
Colder, cold starts, longer warm up times all add to enrichment for every start up. etc. So IDK.
I'd bet $100 bucks that I could go to the track in the winter and run high 13's though...which is exactly what I can run in the summer. It would be fun/interesting to try, but our crappy track is closed in the winter.
.
Last edited by Tom400CFI; Oct 18, 2016 at 11:19 AM.















