When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
If you're trying to correlate "low down" tq then the 60' would be a better measure in there, all C4's 60' about the same; 2.0x.
Except of course that's traction-limited. As always, power is the only number that matters in acceleration. And yeah, I agree the L98 is basically slaughtered in all measures that actually matter. I will agree with Cool Runnings that TPI looks better, though! But yeah, the LT4 is significantly more powerful than the LT1 and lays waste to the L98.
I think it is interesting to see how much variation there is between tests.
For example the L98 6 speed should be no different between the coupe or convertible, but they show 5.6 to 6.3 or 0.7 difference.
The LT1's show 5.1 to 5.7 or 0.6 difference
The LT4's show 4.9 to 5.45 or 0.55 difference.
I think that is why so many of these tests are hard to base performance off of. You don't know the conditions at the time, the driver's skill, etc.
From my experience with owning 3 L98's, 3 LT1's, and 1 LT4 in Corvettes, I believe the LT1's out perform the L98's and the LT4 out performs the LT1. At the higher rpms, the difference is more noticeable, but it seems to me that there is a difference in the lower rpms too.
Originally Posted by Cool Runnings
Interesting how stoplight to stoplight, the L98 is as quick as the LT4 (close anyhoo).
L98 Road Test
Motor Trend
April, 1990
Automatic
0-60..................5.7
6-speed coupe
0-60..................5.6
6-speed convertible
0-60..................6.3
--------------------
LT1 Road Tests Car and Driver
March, 1995
0-60..................5.1
As I mentioned I did have a 94 auto for years and never tried the LT4, but from all the research I did and the feedback I'm getting here (much appreciated) i want to switch to manual LT4 for a keeper. Since I'm not in the states I guess test drivig it is out of the window that's why I wanna cover as much info and details as possible before buying one.
What would be the value range for a good condition 96' Lt4 with mileage let's say below 75k.?
just picked up this 96 lt4 with 60k miles for 11k. I'm second owner. Car is a solid 8 to 9. Well taken care of but driven. I was bound and determined to not spend over 11k.
just picked up this 96 lt4 with 60k miles for 11k. I'm second owner. Car is a solid 8 to 9. Well taken care of but driven. I was bound and determined to not spend over 11k.
congrats on your buy that's a nice one. I have almost the same budget as well. Hope I'll end up with one like it. 👍🏻
And thanks all for the infos.
just picked up this 96 lt4 with 60k miles for 11k. I'm second owner. Car is a solid 8 to 9. Well taken care of but driven. I was bound and determined to not spend over 11k.
Congrats on two nice C4s! Would have to be a new thread but, would really be interested in hearing your impressions of the driving differences between the LT-4 and LT-5. With being able to balance a nickel on the intake of the LT-5 with the engine running leaves me the impression it’s a very “smooth” engine.
Congrats on two nice C4s! Would have to be a new thread but, would really be interested in hearing your impressions of the driving differences between the LT-4 and LT-5. With being able to balance a nickel on the intake of the LT-5 with the engine running leaves me the impression it’s a very “smooth” engine.
B17Crew
I was actually planning on doing a thread like that soon. Only owned the cars for one week. So probably another few days and I will. Stay tuned!
I was actually planning on doing a thread like that soon. Only owned the cars for one week. So probably another few days and I will. Stay tuned!
Ask We Gone about the LT4s...I got to run with him up the highway and we were both running about 50. I had him til 80 or so, but the LT5 took over and just walked away. The LT5 is a beast once it starts to breathe.
Ask We Gone about the LT4s...I got to run with him up the highway and we were both running about 50. I had him til 80 or so, but the LT5 took over and just walked away. The LT5 is a beast once it starts to breathe.
I'm gonna have my buddy drive my lt4 while I drive my lt5. Interested to see how it's gonna go...
From: SCMR Rat Pack'r Charter Member..Great Bend KS
Originally Posted by FAUEE
The LT4 is essentially a really.mild hewd/cam LT1, with a power rating that doesn't really add up to what they did. I suspect the 330hp claimed is really more like 350hp actual, and it made more power than the LS1,
Years ago, a buddy who had a very new 1997 (AIR) C5 6M with the LS1 and I took our cars to a dyno shop. His C5 was stock with about 15K miles, my LT4 was also stock with about 60K miles on the odometer.
His car posted 314hp at the rear wheels, mine posted 311.
Years ago, a buddy who had a very new 1997 (AIR) C5 6M with the LS1 and I took our cars to a dyno shop. His C5 was stock with about 15K miles, my LT4 was also stock with about 60K miles on the odometer.
His car posted 314hp at the rear wheels, mine posted 311.
If run on the same, same dyno, that’d be an apples to apples comparison. Interesting numbers for sure.