Torque Specs
Thread Starter
Navigator
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Vincent Ohio
Torque Specs
Ready to install 6 speed trans. on my 89. Need the torque specs for the "C" column that connects the trans to diff. I am pretty sure front and rear are different. Torque front to 65, I think, cant remember rear bolts. Any assistance would be appreciated.
Last edited by Jim Rhodes; Sep 20, 2018 at 08:39 AM.
Race Director
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,179
Likes: 979
From: Think BEFORE hitting "Submit Reply"
I think you might be in the wrong forum, brother.
Race Director
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,691
Likes: 322
From: Alexandria VA
Front (C beam to trans) is 37ft lbs. Rear (cbeam to diff) is 59ftlbs.
I torque mine to '2 uggs'; I've torqued them to spec only to have them repeatedly loosen. Don't recall if the nuts are locking or not but nothing more annoying than being on the track and hearing a massive "thunk" when you get on the gas and know exactly what it is. . .
And yes, wrong section
I torque mine to '2 uggs'; I've torqued them to spec only to have them repeatedly loosen. Don't recall if the nuts are locking or not but nothing more annoying than being on the track and hearing a massive "thunk" when you get on the gas and know exactly what it is. . .
And yes, wrong section
Last edited by RandomTask; Sep 20, 2018 at 10:30 AM.
Thread Starter
Navigator
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Vincent Ohio
Front (C beam to trans) is 37ft lbs. Rear (cbeam to diff) is 59ftlbs.
I torque mine to '2 uggs'; I've torqued them to spec only to have them repeatedly loosen. Don't recall if the nuts are locking or not but nothing more annoying than being on the track and hearing a massive "thunk" when you get on the gas and know exactly what it is. . .
And yes, wrong section
I torque mine to '2 uggs'; I've torqued them to spec only to have them repeatedly loosen. Don't recall if the nuts are locking or not but nothing more annoying than being on the track and hearing a massive "thunk" when you get on the gas and know exactly what it is. . .
And yes, wrong section
