When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have never been a Ford guy, but the way GM is going I might not have much of a choice in the future. That is not good news about their fit and finish, however.
As far as the plastic oil pans go, I was amazed the first time I saw one as well. My brothers GTI has one, and VW puts them on every Jetta/Golf so it must work for them.
I don't take something VW does as necessarily "a good idea" haha. But beyond that, there's a big of a different use case between a GTI or Jetta and an F150 or Explorer. A lot less likely to run over rocks or debris in a Jetta or gti than a truck or suv...
I don't take something VW does as necessarily "a good idea" haha. But beyond that, there's a big of a different use case between a GTI or Jetta and an F150 or Explorer. A lot less likely to run over rocks or debris in a Jetta or gti than a truck or suv...
I am not saying it is a good idea either, just that there are millions of them out there and if the failure rate was high they would have changed it. I also disagree about which is more likely to run over something, have you seen how VW owners drive ?
Hey Linus, glad you are looking into getting a C4. If you are looking for a cheap performance car you really can’t get a lower price for the same or better performance. While I do really like some of the earlier C4s, when shopping I limited my search to 1992 or later. If reliability is your worry I would search for later C4s as well, the newer the less likely for problems was my theory. However, maybe some guys on here will tell you that an 80s C4 is equally reliable despite its age, I am not sure. Also by the end of the C4’s run GM was able to create a car with less bugs than before making a car that is easier to own. I too wanted something cheap but not something I had to dump time and money into fixing. I settled on the ‘95-‘96 because it had an upgraded version of the commonly faulty “opti-spark distributor” that was found on the LT-1 engine cars that started in 1992. I felt that a mix between fixes like this and the car being newer would be best for reliability. I ended up not choosing the ‘96 because in 1996 OBD II was started on cars meaning ‘96 cars would not be able to share some major parts such as transmissions with other C4s. That being said I wanted parts to be cheap if something had to go. I got my 1995 a couple months ago and I love it. It was very well taken care of and had less than 40k miles. I drive it as much as I can and I so far only needed to do brakes. I will end with saying that I disagree with what one of the other responders said. He said that most minivans can keep up with a C4 in a drag race. That is entirely false. LT-1 C4s have 0-60 times around 5 seconds which was extremely competitive for the 90s but still a ton of fun today. You will have a great time in one of these cars and they still feel pretty quick. Maybe not in comparison to a C5z or a C7 but I have a feeling you will be proud to own one. Feel free to contact me with any more questions about your search.
I agree with 100% of the above...The flex issue initially concerned me, but several relatively inexpensive solutions exist to resolve those.
What many people dont realize is the power that the 2nd Gen LT1 puts out is actually greater than the famed 1st Gen LT1, keeping in mind that the 1st Gens figures were not BHP, whereas, the 2nd Gen's figures are.
Considering that parasitic drivetrain and/or accessory loss are definitely factors, 2nd Gen is more powerful and also faster. Those early motors could be stump pullers, but their suspensions lacked the refinements and were just slower, than what was to follow.
Since you are DeepSouth and thinking of going to Nashville, I'm 1.5 hours before there. Feel free to talk about stopping in and driving my 96 coupe. But, it's an auto, so...
Something like 75-80% of the C4's were built with automatics.... I was dead set on the manual, and was overly thrilled to find one, not far from my home. The ZF transmission is right beneath/next to the driver and yes, you can hear the gears doing their thing. There were 2 versions (black tag and blue tag, with the black tag version being preferred). I lifted the car, saw the black tag, and decided: This is a car I am interested in...Test drove it and fell in love. The shifter is a bit notchy, but there is a definite slot for every shift and neutral, 3rd, and 4th are always RIGHT THERE...No missing shifts with this car. Its still a complete thrill to drive and its fairly easy to maintain...