When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
So uh I've had a fiero itch lately which lead to ridiculous amounts of research... then an idea that walks a dangerous line between ungodly and perfection popped into my head... what would it take to swap a 3800 into an 86 vette? I mean corvette stans shun the c4 as the ugliest and worst (... sledgehammer exists ...) so why not do something different with it. It's already light af and a 3800 is lighter than a 350 sooo I'm thinking compound boost with a blower and dual sequential Turbo set up. (Yes I'm insane) the block can easily handle it with head studs and some magic (cryogenic treatment).
I'm just curious how does one Mach up mounting points? For modifications of the k member. Or does someone make something that deletes the mono leaf spring for a coil over conversation for the front as a whole front end sub frame?
please fuel my curiosity and insanity thank you!
Why a 3800 the better option would be a 4.3 Chevy V-6 it is basically, 3/4 of a 350... The Twin Turbo like the Typhoon and Cyclone GMC trucks... with todays turbo tech it will make a load of power. If there is enough room the Astro Vans came with 4.3L plus some where All Wheel Drive... The 4.3 has the same bellhousing and hooks up to the 700R4 as it was the standard transmission...
Waaaayy back, and I'm talking around 20 years or so, I saw an article and some photos of an '84 or '85 with a heavily-modified Grand National 3.8. So it HAS been done. Also found this thread. https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...6-in-a-c4.html Maybe it's the same guy?
The 4.3 was also used in a gazillion of the various vehicles that were based on the S10 chassis. Blazer, S10 truck, Bravada, Jimmy, etc. Most of the Chevy W/T (work trucks) were delivered with the 4.3 also. IIRC, many of the full-size vans were also so equipped.
As previously noted, the engine is indeed a 350 SBC with two cylinders deleted.
The 4.3 was also used in a gazillion of the various vehicles that were based on the S10 chassis. Blazer, S10 truck, Bravada, Jimmy, etc. Most of the Chevy W/T (work trucks) were delivered with the 4.3 also. IIRC, many of the full-size vans were also so equipped.
As previously noted, the engine is indeed a 350 SBC with two cylinders deleted.
Live well,
SJW
Matter of fact as well, I believe it’s a shortened LT1. When I bought the fel pro timing cover and seal kit for my LT1, it was marked 5.7/4.3. I had no clue until then.
Why a 3800 the better option would be a 4.3 Chevy V-6 it is basically, 3/4 of a 350... The Twin Turbo like the Typhoon and Cyclone GMC trucks... with todays turbo tech it will make a load of power. If there is enough room the Astro Vans came with 4.3L plus some where All Wheel Drive... The 4.3 has the same bellhousing and hooks up to the 700R4 as it was the standard transmission...
because the 4.3 is a boat anchor and kinda crappy under boost. the 3800 is unique and takes boost like a champ and is overall lighter
You can do all the same turbo stuff to the stock engine, given that they're essentially the same architecture.
Or if it's the reduced weight you like, then an all aluminum LS makes more sense.
because that's boring? Why tf would I want to when everyone and their mom does that? There's no creativity in that. plus there's something about saying you smoked someone with a 3800.
Why a 3800 the better option would be a 4.3 Chevy V-6 it is basically, 3/4 of a 350... The Twin Turbo like the Typhoon and Cyclone GMC trucks... with todays turbo tech it will make a load of power. If there is enough room the Astro Vans came with 4.3L plus some where All Wheel Drive... The 4.3 has the same bellhousing and hooks up to the 700R4 as it was the standard transmission...
also I'm going with 3800 because it's the better engine and it was in a rwd form in the Firebird. 4.3s are pretty crappy 3800s have been known to run with a hole in the block
Okay, so this isn't so much about strict functionality as it is about novelty. That's legit.
In that case, how about pushing your idea a bit farther and going with a Toyota 2GR-FE 3.5 V6? All aluminum so (a little) lighter than the 3.8 and they make pretty impressive power even in naturally aspirated form. Lotus uses them.
There's a guy on youtube who's claiming 330 RWHP in his MR2 with one, no turbo. So I imagine going the turbocharged route could yield all the power you'd need.
because that's boring? Why tf would I want to when everyone and their mom does that? There's no creativity in that. plus there's something about saying you smoked someone with a 3800.
This will be a cool hot-rodding project. I hope you'll post up a build thread for it. Let the fun begin.
The 3800 in the F Body was garbage and a boat anchor. People who had them wanted the v8, not to try to do some crazy build.
You're obviously welcome to do what you want to be different, but sometimes being different just means spending a lot more money to get less bang for the buck.
because that's boring? Why tf would I want to when everyone and their mom does that? There's no creativity in that. plus there's something about saying you smoked someone with a 3800.
Your opinion matters... however... when was the last time you saw an LS in a C4 in person? I have yet to see one, however, living in California makes for real issues anytime somebody bucks the stock configuration of what motor went in what car after 1975.
If you put a strong LS in your C4 I believe you would be very pleased once it was sorted out. Add to that, if you were to ever sell it the prospects would be pretty good that a buyer would be found.
If I remember right they (the 4.3) may have been a NASCAR version in the Bush Series? Something like 650hp or something like that.
I don't know how you would get 650 hp out of a 4.3 motor without a lot of turbo boost. It's practically impossible to get a naturally aspirated engine of any design to make 4 hp per cubic inch on gasoline.
Maybe in Formula 1 where engines costing 100K plus and turn 18,000 rpm... Not going to happen on the street without major boost of 30 + lbs or more.
I will admit, Nascar engines are something special.
Correction, I saw that they made upwards of 500hp (not the earlier 650hp) and the Buick was one of the best performers... The Cyclone and Typhoon were very fast all-wheel drive turbo 4.3L,
V-6 Chevy. Looks like the V6 were used up until 1993 or 94'... Ford also campaigned a V-6, to be competitive this means that all had to be making 450hp to 500hp so there were no runaway winners. a Nascar 358 cubic inch small block with 14:1 compression ratio a single carburetor made 850hp and revved to 10,000 rpms, according to Wikipedia with no restrictor plates they produced over 1,000hp. Not bad no power adder but then again they were luck to survive 500 miles at a time...
The switch back to all V-8's in 1994 in the Bush Series was limited to only 9:1 compression ratio... Cheers.
Back in the 70s my dad and his best friend transplanted a diesel engine that was originally paired with a generator into a F100 pickup. Was it the best idea? No. Was it easy? heck no. Did they have fun? oh yes. Even as a kid I remember them taking it to the local Ford dealer for an oil change. The great thing about this hobby is that if you can do it, and it makes you happy that is all that matters.