When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The '84-90 wheels were designed to draw the air in, while the '91-'96 were designed to draw air out. This is straight from one of the engineers.
That's correct.
GM's first idea was to "scoop" air into the wheel well and cool off the brakes, but that had disadvantages with lift.
The second version of the sawblade ('91-'96) was designed to draw air out from behind the wheel. They found this to not only be more effective at cooling the brakes, but it also decreased lift. :auto:
Hey guys, I just want to thank you for the clarification on this issue. :thumbs: When I bought my Vette, the front wheels were mounted correctly, while the back ones were going in the oppisite direction. When I got my new Kumhos on the rear, I had the direction changed, and they look much better. Thanks again for the imput. :seeya
If you mount them backwards you will not cool off your brakes as well as it was designed to do.
If you look at the saw blades they look like little side air fins(Like the ones you see on the side of rear engine cars) that suck the air into the wheels and onto the brakes.
Sorry I just went outside and took a good look at the sawblades and yes I was wrong they are designed to suck the air out.
They are designed with a turbine effect so if you turn them around they will only push some air in, alot less then what they would pull out.
The lift is a factor for track use, and it's one reason the CC teams reversed the wheels. When they did, brake temps went down. Those results may well have prompted GM engineers to reverse the flow on later production vettes. For normal driving, lift wouldn't be a factor.
As for the street use, the problems I've seen or heard of had to do with having the Gatorbacks mounted backwards, either on the wheel itself or on the car. That caused some handling issues and, allegedly, some accidents. Other than Mr. Mojo's post, I've never heard of cooling problems, and while I'm glad the problem went away afterward, I'm not sure the reversal was the actual solution.
Back then, few cars had any induced airflow in that area whatsoever and were typically packaged more tightly around less-ventilated wheels and lower-performance brakes without problems ensuing.