LT-1 versus LT1
Jul 8, 2003 | 11:01 AM
Thread Starter
Intermediate
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs CO
LT-1 versus LT1
I was talking to a friend of mine the other night and he says that LT-1 designates the 1970s LT-1 engine and the LT1 (without the dash) is the correct designation for 1990s version. Is this a big deal or not? I was going to order a decal for my 1992, but it said LT-1. I want to be correct and not look like an idiot. Thanks :confused:
Jul 8, 2003 | 11:03 AM
Drifting
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,705
Likes: 5
From: OKC Oklahoma
Re: LT-1 versus LT1 (RED LT1)
he's right LT-1 is a 70-72 designation and LT1 is a 92-96(97 including f-bodies) designation :D
Jul 8, 2003 | 11:16 AM
Le Mans Master
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,473
Likes: 1
From: Cleveland
Cruise-In III Veteran
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Re: LT-1 versus LT1 (RED LT1)
your friend is correct
Jul 8, 2003 | 12:29 PM
Burning Brakes
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
From: royal palm beach florida
Re: LT-1 versus LT1 (_freakmonkeydogboy_)
Quote:
he's right LT-1 is a 70-72 designation and LT1 is a 92-96(97 including f-bodies) designation :D
:iagree: :iagree:
Jul 8, 2003 | 04:05 PM
Race Director
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,717
Likes: 5
From: RI
Re: LT-1 versus LT1 (RED LT1)
yep that's it
Jul 8, 2003 | 05:37 PM
Team Owner
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 32,739
Likes: 19
From: Try not to complain so much....
St. Jude Donor '14
Re: LT-1 versus LT1 (_freakmonkeydogboy_)
Quote:
he's right LT-1 is a 70-72 designation and LT1 is a 92-96(97 including f-bodies) designation :D
Impala SS too..... :D
Jul 8, 2003 | 05:48 PM
Le Mans Master
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,878
Likes: 2
From: Madison Mississippi
Re: LT-1 versus LT1 (GTrain)
Quote:
he's right LT-1 is a 70-72 designation and LT1 is a 92-96(97 including f-bodies) designation :D
Impala SS too..... :D
:yesnod: :yesnod:
Jul 8, 2003 | 11:56 PM
Drifting
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,705
Likes: 5
From: OKC Oklahoma
Re: LT-1 versus LT1 (GTrain)
Quote:
he's right LT-1 is a 70-72 designation and LT1 is a 92-96(97 including f-bodies) designation :D
Impala SS too..... :D
but the impala was done in 96, only the f-bodies carried it into 97 :p:
[Modified by _freakmonkeydogboy_, 8:45 AM 7/9/2003]
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer
Brett Foote
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)
Michael S. Palmer
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years
Joe Kucinski
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!
Michael S. Palmer
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!
Joe Kucinski
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter
Joe Kucinski
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time
Verdad Gallardo
Jul 9, 2003 | 12:05 AM
Drifting
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
From: sussex nj
Re: LT-1 versus LT1 (_freakmonkeydogboy_)
Quote:
he's right LT-1 is a 70-72 designation and LT1 is a 92-96(97 including f-bodies) designation :D
learned something new tonight
Jul 9, 2003 | 07:49 AM
Pro
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: Stewartsville NJ
Re: LT-1 versus LT1 (fiberglasscoffin)
Quote:
he's right LT-1 is a 70-72 designation and LT1 is a 92-96(97 including f-bodies) designation :D learned something new tonight
Humpf! Me too!
Jules :thumbs:
Jul 9, 2003 | 09:00 AM
Le Mans Master
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,362
Likes: 30
From: Oak Harbor WA
Re: LT-1 versus LT1 (champ53)
I've gotten tired of correcting folks here on the forum for posting the LT-1 when referring to their later engine. So I don't do it any longer.
Your friend is correct. :grouphug:
Jul 9, 2003 | 11:48 AM
Burning Brakes
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 6
From: Arlington TN
Re: LT-1 versus LT1 (Goody)
Learn something new everyday!! :cheers: