new thermostat?
Some folks are putting in 160 degree thermostats. Considering how hot the vette runs normally (210 - 230 degrees) and that heat is generally considered "bad" for an engine, is there any drawback to this cooler setup? It sure sounds logical that a cooler thermostat would extend the life of the engine.
Glen
:chevy
Some folks are putting in 160 degree thermostats. Considering how hot the vette runs normally (210 - 230 degrees) and that heat is generally considered "bad" for an engine, is there any drawback to this cooler setup? It sure sounds logical that a cooler thermostat would extend the life of the engine.
Glen
The engine is designed to operate most efficiently within a certain temp window. Either too low or too high is detrimental for not only emissions, but power and long life of the engine.
Most folks start to get nervous when they see their temp gauge hit 200, as if 200 is somehow "bad". Maybe that's why most cars come only with "idiot gauges which only have a needle or, in some cases just a red warning light.
When the coolant is too low, wear is accelerated and if it's the oil that's running too cool, moisture isn't eliminated.
My engine feels much more responsive at 220 than it does at 180. I'd love to be able to maintain that 220 coolant temp year round, but with the Texas summers, that isn't possible.
So I have to settle for a minimum low temp of 180 and 220 as a max. Of course when working the engine on one of favorite switch-back roads, temps can climb to the 230/240 range.
180 to 200 seems to be the range that most like, but unless the PROM is programmed to command the fan to turn on earlier, or an aftermarked switch installed, just installing a lower temp thermostat won't do much good. It's just take a little longer for the temps to rise to their "pre-stat change" level.
Just my thoughts.
Jake












