When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Does anyone know of someone who makes a nice set of poly or solid mounts for the early C4's or if the stock mounts are sufficient to withstand 600-800hp? i figure i might as well swap the mounts even if they're good. it's been 143k miles of abuse and tripling the power on mounts that old scares me a bit...
I second this question. I bought some Energy Suspension polyurethane inserts for the clam shell mounts but they didn't fit the Vette clam shells. I've looked through the Energy Suspension catalog and they don't list a mount for the C4 Vettes. I just sent them an e-mail asking about it. I'll post their response.
I couldn't find anything other than stock mounts myself. I made a torque arm from the cylinder head to the frame with heim joints and tube, to limit engine travel.
I couldn't find anything other than stock mounts myself. I made a torque arm from the cylinder head to the frame with heim joints and tube, to limit engine travel.
with the big block, i'm probably only running the alt. and PS so i should have a few open pads...how did you go about fabbing this arm? any pics?
Ever think about solid mounts? would have to put a solid mount on the tranny too.
Huh? Do you know how a C4 Vette is put together? This is the C4 section isn't it? There is NO tranny mount, unless you consider the SOLID torque arm to be the rear tranny mount (it is by the way - solid)...
Tom Melton
82 CE (with rubber tranny mount)
86 Z51 Coupe with solid tranny mount)
Huh? Do you know how a C4 Vette is put together? This is the C4 section isn't it? There is NO tranny mount, unless you consider the SOLID torque arm to be the rear tranny mount (it is by the way - solid)...
Tom Melton
82 CE (with rubber tranny mount)
86 Z51 Coupe with solid tranny mount)
I could see putting a cross brace under the tranny, dont know if it would be easy or not or what you would connect too.
I have heard you do not want to run a solid mount with the C4 blocks Lt1/lt4. What I have heard is they have taken so much material out of the block to lighten, its like paper. Solid mounts would rip the block apart. Do not have any data to back this up, however thought I would share what I have heard.
Why,,,, does not matter to me,, I am just saynig I could see how it could be done.
Race Past!
I'd be afraid of messing up the engineering by adding a fixed mounting point at the rear of the trans. Kind of like running guide plates with self aligning rockers. I think there is a chance things could bind up. I'd like to see solid mounts at each side of the engine and solid bushings in the ends of the batwing.
I'd be afraid of messing up the engineering by adding a fixed mounting point at the rear of the trans. Kind of like running guide plates with self aligning rockers. I think there is a chance things could bind up. I'd like to see solid mounts at each side of the engine and solid bushings in the ends of the batwing.
RACE ON!!!
Question,,, does an automatic have the same mouting as a stick, no crosssbrace?
Gotta run,,,,,,,,,,,,,,20th anniversary tonight wifey is waiting!
BTW, I just thought of a problem mounts can cause. I have seen conventional chassis cars with a solid trans mount, and rubber engine mounts, break transmission cases.
I have heard you do not want to run a solid mount with the C4 blocks Lt1/lt4. What I have heard is they have taken so much material out of the block to lighten, its like paper. Solid mounts would rip the block apart. Do not have any data to back this up, however thought I would share what I have heard.
Blocks are the same as far as I know. GM did go to a thinner connecting rod in '89 though.
Huh? Do you know how a C4 Vette is put together? This is the C4 section isn't it? There is NO tranny mount, unless you consider the SOLID torque arm to be the rear tranny mount (it is by the way - solid)...
Tom Melton
82 CE (with rubber tranny mount)
86 Z51 Coupe with solid tranny mount)
It ain't THAT solid... It's the number one killer of the differential case on these cars. ANY slop (even as little as .060") will cause a shear load to be placed upon the pinion nose of the case. When you launch the car the tailhousing tries to climb upwards; slop in the c-beam will allow more movement which will create a severe shear load on the diff. That's generally what occurs when you see a diff busted at the nose. The most ideal way of eliminating this is with a real cross-member; which unfortunately is quite difficult to achieve in a C4.
ANY movement that is not transmitted to the tires (via engine torquing over, driveline movement, even the IRS's movement) is wasted hp; it does not translate into power at the ground. The more solid you can make the powertrain and drivetrain the better the chassis will work and less breakage will occur.
That said, I've actually got some 3/16" plate that I've templated to have some solid mounts built... They will be one piece bent on a hyd. press (just like solid mounts you find from Moroso and others). But, like all of my projects it will come about when I have time...
-Jeb