When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: Everyday you must choose between the pain of discipline and the pain of regret. Fredericktown, OH
In your position, I would call comp cams or another cam company and give them your specs and be very honest with them about your goals for the car. Meaning, do you street it 90% of the time or race it 90% of the time. They will recommend a cam for your needs.
I've done this with several 406s I've done and been very pleased with the out put and results.
There are many very knowledgeable people on the forum and you'll get some great advice - but you will get several different opinions based on what each person thinks is more important - low end torque, peak HP, driveablity, race-only, etc.
From: Everyday you must choose between the pain of discipline and the pain of regret. Fredericktown, OH
Originally Posted by aqualung
From what I have seen, more lift is almost always better.
I have to disagree. An engine is a combination of a number of pieces that must work together well in order to achieve peak efficiency (performance). Cam lift is very much contingent upon cylinder head capability, compression, purpose of the car, intake and carb or injection limitations, torque converter, etc.
You can't just toss a big cam in a car and expect it to perform better. The entire combination must be matched or you'll sacrifice performance and driveability.
When I bracket raced, I did play around with 3 cams in one of the 406s I had. The bigger of the three made less power than the middle one. And the smaller of the three actually made more torque.
From what I have seen, more lift is almost always better.
However, TPIS doesn't seem to always agree. They usually recommend 1.5 rockers. Not sure why. Better valvetrain stability I suppose.
You got nothing to lose (but money) by giving 1.6 or even 1.7 a try. Just make sure your valvetrain components are up to the task.
More lift is NOT always better. Factors such as head flow and intake design dictate if you will see any benefit of adding more lift. If more lift by itself was always better we would all be running pro stock comparable valve lift in our engines. Keep in mind the more you lift the valve the harder it is on your entire valve train and especially your valve springs. The key is building a package where all parts are working in harmony together and not against each other.
I have the same top end as you on a 350 forged internals i have the tpis zz9x cam with the 1.5 rr. Dosent kick in at about 3K rpm's but its a kick from there till 6.5K rpms. Not very easy to drive in stop and go trafic but its ok. I have a maual tranny
\
I have to disagree. An engine is a combination of a number of pieces that must work together well in order to achieve peak efficiency (performance). Cam lift is very much contingent upon cylinder head capability, compression, purpose of the car, intake and carb or injection limitations, torque converter, etc.
You can't just toss a big cam in a car and expect it to perform better. The entire combination must be matched or you'll sacrifice performance and driveability.
When I bracket raced, I did play around with 3 cams in one of the 406s I had. The bigger of the three made less power than the middle one. And the smaller of the three actually made more torque.
Firstly, I did say "ALMOST always better". And secondly, what is a "large cam"? I know I am stating the obvious when I say duration and lift are two different things.
Just look at your flowsheet. Do your heads flow better at .595 lift or .560 lift?
If you have 2 cams with the same duration, the .595 lift cam will most likely make more horsepower than the .560 lift cam. That's all I am saying.
looking at my flow sheet I think I should go with 1.6 rockers which would put me at 554 lift. 1.7 would put me at 589 lift which I would gain on exhaust but loose on my intake
1.6's it is then........i personally think 1.7's are too much man.
might look cool on a spec sheet as to what a motor has but i think 1.6's are the way to go.coil bind might be an issue with what ever spings you have so i'd check to see before buying 1.7's.
I would go with the 1.6 you can always change the push rod if you want more lift.
I think the duration is a little much .
Small blocks love lift but hate duration.
just my 02.
I usually overlift the valve by .030 above the max flow number. Works well for me.
This is a good idea ,why because if you get a cam that has lift higher than where your best flow is,you actually see the better flow numbers longer.Why,because if you have a 580 lift cam,it is only at max lift for a very short time,were as it is at the lower lifts while the lifter is on the way up and again on its way back down.Therefore the dwell time at best flow rate is extended.This is of course if you are trying to squeeze all available power from your motor,just because this thnking makes power,doesn't mean you will like the manners of the engine.I have always been of the thinking,select the cam you think you want,then buy the next smallest one!
Good Luck,
Duane Hawley