Intake choices
Before anyone side tracks about "It depends on what you want to do", I will answer that now: a street performer that I can take to work and auto-x/race on the occassion (I dont drag race). It doesnt have to do 0-60 in less than 3 seconds, I can sleep at night knowing it doesn't have 500+ rwhp, and I dont expect to set any road course records. I do want to increase my performance and win a couple of auto-x's though!
I just got a set of 195cc AFR comp package heads (not installed yet) and have a modified exhaust (headers, High flow cats, and Borla Y pipe and mufflers). My current intake is the an Edelbrock with stock plenum (I dont think it was ported/modified) with the stock TB. I want to keep this within the realm of California emissions, which is why the 383 has been put on the back burner (I so hate the number 49!). Oh yeah, it has a black tag ZF6 with a centerforce clutch.
The main reason I ask this is because I have read that people get completely different results from the exact same setup with the only difference being the intake. Superram seems to be a favorite here though I have seen some who want/have switched to TPIS Miniram. No one seems to like the Edelbrock or cares to admit it except me
!Calculations are not necessary but if someone has used a combination of these intakes and seen a difference, I would really like to hear the story.
Last edited by Performance nut; Jul 17, 2005 at 07:45 AM.
If you want to do something like a SR or MR intake get a cam to match the power band that the shorter intake runner length will generate.





If you want to do something like a SR or MR intake get a cam to match the power band that the shorter intake runner length will generate.
By making the modifications you speak of you will be bumping yourself out of A Stock, which I presume you are in, and most likely into SM2. The competition in SM2 is really stiff and thats where all the big $$$ cars are. So I think you will have a blast with a SR/219 combo, but I wouldn't count on it being the key to winning auto-x's.
Also, I have talk to a forum member about his 383 (I know you are going 350 but the point is, he can feed this size motor) he is having sucess with a TPI hi-flow intake. He claims the torque really helps him out especially in auto-x.
That said I will be going with a SR'd 383 in SM2 for kicks next season.
Good luck!
By making the modifications you speak of you will be bumping yourself out of A Stock, which I presume you are in, and most likely into SM2. The competition in SM2 is really stiff and thats where all the big $$$ cars are. So I think you will have a blast with a SR/219 combo, but I wouldn't count on it being the key to winning auto-x's.
Also, I have talk to a forum member about his 383 (I know you are going 350 but the point is, he can feed this size motor) he is having sucess with a TPI hi-flow intake. He claims the torque really helps him out especially in auto-x.
That said I will be going with a SR'd 383 in SM2 for kicks next season.
Good luck!
As for the 383, the only (and I mean only) reason I dont intend to stroke it out is due to California emissions. I have read articles about people who have built 383's and pass California emissions, but they have always used carbs. By experience with engines is quite limited and I am not prepared to blow several thousand dollars on an experiment that might fail. If someone out there has proven results, I am all ears
.





219 is a low-midrange cam.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts





To my way of thinking, an EO compliant L98 high po motor is a no brainer:
1. The largest displacement possible,
2. EO stickers for your heads and intake (the SR and AFRs are top drawer here),
3. A well matched cam that doesn't have an extended duration.
There may be people suggesting better choices out there for heads and intakes, but just ask for the EO number.........it won't happen
Check my sig for an emisions compliant 500ish buildup NA. Oh, BTW, NOS (nitrous) has an EO number too
). Do you have your most recent smog results? If a 421 can pass, 383 should be do'able. What kind of exhaust do you use?As far as NOS, no thanks.
Auto-x'ing and NOS dont mix well.
As mentioned, with your cam you should be fine with a 383 and good tuning. The trick is to keep the ECM in full control of the A/F when in closed loop mode.
BTW, thanks all for you input. It is not falling on deaf ears.
As mentioned, with your cam you should be fine with a 383 and good tuning. The trick is to keep the ECM in full control of the A/F when in closed loop mode.

Uhm... ok. So when you say valve event overlap, are you talking about LSA or is this different?
As far as closed loop mode, I am not familiar with that at all. I know what a closed loop is but I am not sure how it applies to fuel injection and engine management. Could you explain the last part?
BTW, thanks all for you input. It is not falling on deaf ears.
Last edited by GlennS87; Jul 18, 2005 at 09:28 AM.





This is it in a nutshell!







