224/230 cam for 396
just wanted to make sure:
i´m building a 396 with 210 AFR heads, and a few other goodies, and my cam decision is 275/224 .605 in, 281/230 .622 ex 113LSA 110ICL
is this a good cam for a daily driver-weekend warrier?
i hope so, since its already at home
some forum members put down good numbers!!
regards
just wanted to make sure:
i´m building a 396 with 210 AFR heads, and a few other goodies, and my cam decision is 275/224 .605 in, 281/230 .622 ex 113LSA 110ICL
is this a good cam for a daily driver-weekend warrier?
I don't find it very difficult to drive and I have a McLeod Street Twin, which is difficult to launch occassionally. I bumped the idle up to 1000 rpm and it seems to like it up there. Let me know how it turns out for you.
Mike
on a reverse-flow cool engine with short intake runners, that small a cam would work better.
-michael
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
compression is 10.5 to 1
should i go with 230/236??
keep in mind, i want good street manners also
rockers and I drove it in a funeral in the summer with the ac on with no problems.
-michael
CR is 10.8:1, has stock heads ported by CNC, think the valves are 1.6 and 2.02 but can't remember, 1.6 RR's, long tubes, 52mm tb and a few other bolt-ons.
Car is very streetable (as would be expected) and runs like a banshee when you get on it! I can only speak from my own experience, but I am very happy with this cam.
Mike
-michael
i ´ll take this as a compliment, and youre right, i have cracked my head over nights, run Desktop Dyno x times, also talked with forum members´about the power their cars make, aso...
i use the accel single plane EFI with a selfmade custom plenum...
AFAIK the Accel SP should be a good match between SR and LTx or Miniram intake, also, i want a fair idle quality combined with good street manners and good power...
if you have good flowing heads, you can shorten cam duration and still make tons of power and torque..and for me, torque is more important than the last 20 hp..we have roads with lots of curves in them...
i think, the 8.2DCR should be a good match for 93octane
the problem is, that here are many people with many different uses for their cars...the cam that is perfect for one, may not be so good for another oner...
what interests me, hoe will the car/engine run with this cam, vacuum, power, torque..overall performance from a neutral standpoint
best regards
Just to give you an idea here is my dyno sheet with quite a bit more duration and I suspect you will make a little more low end TQ them I did and my TQ curve is prety flat across the board.
just wanted to make sure:
i´m building a 396 with 210 AFR heads, and a few other goodies, and my cam decision is 275/224 .605 in, 281/230 .622 ex 113LSA 110ICL
is this a good cam for a daily driver-weekend warrier?
i hope so, since its already at home
some forum members put down good numbers!!
regards

My car is a daily driver, and I mean DAILY, since it's the only one I have. In addition, I've driven it all over the country:
From Texas to Chicago, then from Chicago to Harvard to visit my daughter, then to South Carolina to visit relatives then back to Texas (about 3000 miles round trip.) Next trip this year was from Texas to Denver Colorado, then back to Texas (another 2000 plus miles). Current trip is from Texas to Chicago (900+) which is where I am now). From Chicago, I plan to drive to Phoenix in a few weeks then back to Texas.
I can get over 400 miles per fill up and the engine hasn't missed a beat in the many, many thousands of miles I've put on the cam. Idle is fine at 800 RPMs in gear with just enough lope to make most other drivers think twice; throttle response and low end torque are excellent and nary a problem with vacuum for the power brakes.
The only problem I've had was losing an alternator last year, but that had nothing to do with the engine per se.
From my experience, your cam choice will work GREAT for what you plan to do.
Jake










On my 406CI,, I used a 224/233 w/AFR-210's and changed to a 233/233 and got 35 RWHP increase





