When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
You could if there is no leakage past the rings and valves and there were no pressure drop in the air induction system. You can get a fair idea though. The compression gauge doesn't measure atmospheric pressure, so you have to compensate for that. The CR ideally should be the ratio of the absolute pressure at top dead center divided by the absolute pressure at bottom dead center. That would be pressure gauge + atmospheric divided by atmospheric. Atmospheric will be close to 14.7 lbs /in squared.
absolutely not. the camshaft timing events have just as much (if not more) effect on the cranking compression pressure as static compression ratio does.
you can change cams, or advance/retard your existing cam, and get significantly different numbers.
also, depending on the camshaft timing events, many engines can easily have cranking pressures significantly higher than their corresponding static compression ratios. example, my stock LT4 would crank 195-205 psi, which corresponds to ~14:1.
jfb is totally off base on this one, which is VERY unusual. There is no reliable connection between the cranking pressure and the compression ratio. Of the many variables, the cam timing is the number one consideration in the cranking pressure. Even more so than the compression ratio.
With MSR and CFI-EFI, cam duration and overlap will affect cylinder pressure! I used to have a 12.5 to 1 compression big block that
would run on regular and I believe it was all due to the cam, the downside my brakes sucked at idle.
Mike
Within a narrow range, the actual number is pretty meaningless. It is how the numbers from each of the cylinders compare to one another that tells you anything.