When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I've been searching the net for a while and I can't seem to find anything that clearly states the difference between LT1 and 1pc rear main Gen 1 SBC bottom end components. Will Gen 1 SBC cranks not work in an LT1 block? Is there a simple modification to make them work? The reason I ask is because while crusing ebay looking at forged Eagle stroker cranks, I have come across different p/n for each.
Ok, I found this in Doug Anderson's "Rebuilding the Chevrolet LT-1"
The crank for the LT1 looks just like the one in the late 350 and has the same casting number 14088526, but it’s balanced for the lightweight pistons that were installed in the LT1. Be sure to keep these cranks separate so they don’t end up in a regular 350, and don’t ever use a regular 350 crank in a LT1. In fact, if you are short of LT1 cranks and don’t have a balancing machine in your shop, you would be better off using a crank from a 305 instead of a 350 because it’s actually closer to the balance specs for the LT1 crank.
So to me, it seems it is only important to use an LT1 specific crank if a person is buiding an engine that does not want to have the rotating assembly neutral balanced. It would also stand to reason you would have to use a neutral balanced dampner and have the flywheel balanced with the crank when not using an LT1 specific crank, which would be the case anyway if doing a zero balance.
From: Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die
St. Jude Donor '04-'05-'06-'07
Obviously if you mix and match components, whether factory, aftermarket or a combination, rebalancing will always be necessary. When I installed even lighter than stock pistons in my LT1, of course I had everything balanced. The good thing is that it allowed weight to be removed from the crank. The whole rotating mass was a few pounds lighter when finished, I forget exactly how much now. My new stroker will be assembled with light stuff too. I like light stuff!
I find it hard to believe that GM would use the same casting no. and then balance differently. This would make for a nightmare on buying a rebuilt crank. Not saying its not true, just hard for me to believe.
From: Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die
St. Jude Donor '04-'05-'06-'07
Originally Posted by 93 ragtop
I find it hard to believe that GM would use the same casting no. and then balance differently. This would make for a nightmare on buying a rebuilt crank. Not saying its not true, just hard for me to believe.
I doubt it's the same casting but just a physically interchangeable part.
The highlighted parts are what I have a hard time believing.
The crank for the LT1 looks just like the one in the late 350 and has the same casting number 14088526, but it’s balanced for the lightweight pistons that were installed in the LT1. Be sure to keep these cranks separate so they don’t end up in a regular 350, and don’t ever use a regular 350 crank in a LT1. In fact, if you are short of LT1 cranks and don’t have a balancing machine in your shop, you would be better off using a crank from a 305 instead of a 350 because it’s actually closer to the balance specs for the LT1 crank.
A casting no. is used to identify a part. IE: a head casting no. will be used for identifying the valve size, combustion chamber size etc. If any design changes were made the casting no. is changed.
LT1/4, L98, L99 cranks all physiclly interchange. The difference is in balancing. I even put a L99 3.00 stroke crank in a L98 block and made a 450 HP 302. I had the crank preped right and balanced with 6.25' rods and forged pistons and with the flywheel and damper. All swaps must be balanced for piston/rod/flywheel combos and must be balanced as a set.
A casting no. is used to identify a part. IE: a head casting no. will be used for identifying the valve size, combustion chamber size etc. If any design changes were made the casting no. is changed.
If GM did this, they really screwed up.
WRONG!
A casting number merely identifies a CASTING. Once cast, it is possible to machine that casting into multiple parts and therefore part numbers. You've never heard of both 2 and 4 bolt main blocks having the same casting number?
Speaking of two and 4 bolt mains. Either block takes the same crankshaft.