Guys with 383, Question inside.
Anyways, thats a brief indication of some of the mods i have bought allready.
Big question is, If i decide to go this route, My goal will be too trap 117-119 MPH in the 1/4, now from what i hear u need around 400rwhp to do that, I am not sure if that is true or not. My car is an 88 Vette with the 4+3. I am thinking I will keep in the 3.07's if i go this route, and see what happens. My 3.07's in the 4+3 is like someone with a ZF6 that has 3.45's in the first two gears, so thinking the 3.07's wont be all the bad especially with the added rwtq of a 383. If i have to go with a 3.45 gear in the future that so be it, but changing the rear is alot of work.
Anyways for the guys with 383 Minirams/LT-1/LT-4, would you be able to provide me your engine specs, meaning head flow, cam specs, everything if you could?????
I would really appreciate, It is my understanding that our motors need CR/head flow, and a cam to all match. Those are the big 3 things that have to flow well together sort to speak to make some real good power.
Thanks alot! Hope to see some good 383 combo's in the 375rwhp-425rwhp area, and that trap 117-120. Thanks again! This build has been a long project for me, but the fun part is researching, and i want to do it right the first time, not the second time.
Also this setup has to pass emmissions!
Last edited by 88BlackZ-51; Dec 10, 2005 at 09:39 PM.
With a similar set up in my 383 TA with auto, I ran 11.70@116.
The only thing about the Trick Flow heads is that they will need more duration on the exhaust side. Both Bowtye8 and I had heads that flowed hight 70 to low 80% intake/exhaust ratio.
Do you have flow numbers from your heads?
www.geocities.com/dzperf
The cam is a hydraulic roller with the following specs;
242/252 duration @.050
.55x/.56x lift with 1.6 rockers
110 LSA
It's one of the largest hydraulic rollers I have seen. I thought about going to a solid roller...but this is my daily-driver car and I didn't want to have to constantly adjust the valves.
The heads and intake were ported by the guy that designed the cam, they have been flowed and he told me the number but I lost the original flow sheet. He has a copy but I've been too busy to contact him to get another copy! The flow was 310-315 CFM @.600 intake and around 235 CFM @.600 exhaust. The runners are HUGE, at least 225cc.
Here's a link to a picture of my intake ports next to a set of stock LT4 (190-195cc) heads;
http://img347.imageshack.us/img347/1471/dcp00136nk.jpg
The guy that did the heads told me that a lot of the power was in the combustion chamber design though. He said they were extremely efficient and they allow me to run 11.5:1 compression on crappy AZ 91 octane gas without and pinging or detonation. We are running 35-36* timing ont he top end.
Here's a link to a pic of the combustion chambers and another to a pic of stock LT4 chambers;
Mine;
http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/7199/dcp00123ol.jpg
Stock LT4;
http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/16/dcp00118kd.jpg
As for peak HP and TQ, here's a link to a scan of the dyno sheet...we actually never reached peak HP as it was still making power at around 7K;
http://jayism.kicks-***.net:8082/Pic...newdyno-rs.JPG
With a similar set up in my 383 TA with auto, I ran 11.70@116.
The only thing about the Trick Flow heads is that they will need more duration on the exhaust side. Both Bowtye8 and I had heads that flowed hight 70 to low 80% intake/exhaust ratio.
Do you have flow numbers from your heads?
www.geocities.com/dzperf
yes i do have flow #'s for my heads, did u want to see them?

i dont think my 4+3 or my wallet would like a 434. i want to drive the car, and i dont want tuning issues. 117 plus mph at the traps is fine with me. if a 434 was the easy, and cost effective, more guys would be building them.
Last edited by 88BlackZ-51; Dec 10, 2005 at 10:14 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

o.k. thanks! i just wasnt sure if the 219 would work well with the Miniram.
take care, and thanks for your email.
take care, and thanks for your email.
Did I leave you to believe that the 219 wouldn't work well with a MR? What part of what I told you repeatedly don't you believe?
getting back to the orginal question. anyone else with 383 recipe's that are making good #'s. thanks!
Last edited by 88BlackZ-51; Dec 11, 2005 at 06:33 AM.
The cam is a hydraulic roller with the following specs;
242/252 duration @.050
.55x/.56x lift with 1.6 rockers
110 LSA
It's one of the largest hydraulic rollers I have seen. I thought about going to a solid roller...but this is my daily-driver car and I didn't want to have to constantly adjust the valves.
The heads and intake were ported by the guy that designed the cam, they have been flowed and he told me the number but I lost the original flow sheet. He has a copy but I've been too busy to contact him to get another copy! The flow was 310-315 CFM @.600 intake and around 235 CFM @.600 exhaust. The runners are HUGE, at least 225cc.
Here's a link to a picture of my intake ports next to a set of stock LT4 (190-195cc) heads;
http://img347.imageshack.us/img347/1471/dcp00136nk.jpg
The guy that did the heads told me that a lot of the power was in the combustion chamber design though. He said they were extremely efficient and they allow me to run 11.5:1 compression on crappy AZ 91 octane gas without and pinging or detonation. We are running 35-36* timing ont he top end.
Here's a link to a pic of the combustion chambers and another to a pic of stock LT4 chambers;
Mine;
http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/7199/dcp00123ol.jpg
Stock LT4;
http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/16/dcp00118kd.jpg
As for peak HP and TQ, here's a link to a scan of the dyno sheet...we actually never reached peak HP as it was still making power at around 7K;
http://jayism.kicks-***.net:8082/Pic...newdyno-rs.JPG
MRIII
cam 224/230 .605/.622 lift
complete Hooker header/no cat/aerochamber muffler
I think you'll find that suspension/tire/converter will get you the big gains and with consistantly.
I think the 260 CFM type heads are great on 383's (especially with the SR), But the MR will definitely allow you to take advantage of more cubes (will allow the Tq curve to move lower).
A decent 383 will run <$3K for the bottom end. Tne only difference the extra cost for the 434 block and additional costs for the updated (roller) valve train in the older block.
However, to really take advantage of the 434 you'll need better flowing heads and a much larger cam.
If you're even thinking about the 434 option, then install the MR and the heads. (I'd still opt for a bigger cam with the 224/224 being the smallest for 350). I'd start on all the periphery "might as wells" that go into a "bluit" car. DFI VII
1.75 long tube headers, Cat Back, Hi-power ignition, 1.6 RR on 7/16" studs, etc...
ZD1, what power are u making?
Last edited by 88BlackZ-51; Dec 11, 2005 at 04:15 PM.
Also, the 434 requires alot of other mods to the Rear, Tranny, Computer, and a Roll Cage (to name just a few items).
Heads\Cam or a 383 is very cost effective.
Vic
The MR has no EGR provision and you aren't going to be able to go much bigger than the 219.
yes it does, but i am not worried about the visual, it will pass that no matter what.
even with a 219 ralph, do u think i will meet my power goals (if i get those heads flowing real nice, and a healthy CR?).........


















