When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Oversized are if you need to have your crank ground .010. You can usually get a few grinds done to the crank if it should spin a bearing or something that mars the cranks surface. Wish that is all I needed to do with mine.
Are you measuring the I.D. of the bearings installed in the rods with the caps torqued? My math says, 2.102" - 2.099" = 0.003". My Helms calls for the rod bearing clearance to be 0.0013" to 0.0035". The crank journal should measure between 2.0988" and 2.0998. The bore in the rod, 2.2247" to 2.2252". I have no clue what the ".013 OS" stands for, but with your "standard" crank, a .013" or even a .010" bearing would lock that engine up tighter than (fill in your favorite simile). Depending too much on book specs can get you in trouble. I agree that standard bearings are what you probably need. Install some standards in the rods and measure the I.D. and subtract that from the journal diameter. If your measuring devices aren't all that accurate, plastigage is a good alternative. Depending on what you see, and what are going to use the engine for, a set of 0.001" might be desirable.
As CFI said the OS does NOT stand for oversize. To begin with bearings don't come in "oversize." When you turn the crank the journals become smaller requiring UNDERSIZE bearings.
As CFI described, measure carefully and inspect the journals. You most likely can go back with standard size bearings.
To begin with bearings don't come in "oversize." When you turn the crank the journals become smaller requiring UNDERSIZE bearings.
When the shaft journals are turned, undersized, an over sized bearing is needed to fill the void the grinding created. The bearing for an undersized journal is thicker, or over sized.
When the shaft journals are turned, undersized, an over sized bearing is needed to fill the void the grinding created. The bearing for an undersized journal is thicker, or over sized.
RACE ON!!!
Yes, if you choose to come up with a way to justify the use of the term oversize, the thicker bearing would indeed justify the term oversize. Since that is not the term normally used in the industry, however, it is unlikely that they would stamp OS on the bearing to indicate undersize.
The industry term relates to the size of the journal which becomes undersize from the machine operation.
Yes, if you choose to come up with a way to justify the use of the term oversize, the thicker bearing would indeed justify the term oversize.
I had no need to justify, anything. If your read my post (whoops, I forgot, you only scan posts) you would have noticed that I used neither term, over sized nor undersized. It is common in the industry to call bearings for crank that has been turned, either. I merely mentioned it because you were so quick to jump on Ski.
Now look at who's scanning posts instead of reading them carefully? I did not jump onto ski. I merely wanted him to know the difference so he would know the difference when he goes to buy bearings.
I've been buying engine bearings for over 40 years and I've never heard of an oversize rod or main bearing. That would indicate that there is such a thing as an oversized rod or main journal.
I've offered a truce before and you still haven't accepted. How about now? We can agree to just stop picking at each other and enjoy our cars and learn from each other. I sense that I can learn a lot from you and I may not be very smart, but I've been wrenching long enough that there must be something, somewhere that you can learn from me.
Well not sure what the terminology industrial standard is with bearings, but I have always heard bearings that are used for turned crankshafts referred to as "oversized"
Oversized in the sense they are "thicker" with the same OD size. Hence making up the difference the crank has been turned. I guess we never really questions one another in the use of the terminology since we all knew what we were trying to say. You right though they should be reffered to as undersized.
This is also why I highly suggest and I always buy my bearings from the guy that does our machining. I always double check clearances, but he has yet to let me down.
As for clearances, I would shoot for around .003 and .0035 on the high side.
I am in the process of freshing up my block on an 89 350.
The original GM Rod bearings are marked 013 OS
I measure the journal at 2.099", the worn bearings at 2.102" ID and the rod end at 2.225" OD
From the Clevite 77 Catalog the standard bearing shells are 0.062 thick.
This adds up to a 0.002 clearance with standard sizes.
I'm I figuring this correctly? It looks like I just need STD rod bearings.
What's up with the 013 OS stamped size?
thanks in advance for the help?
I saw same numbers on L98 motor. The number was 013 OS printed exactly.
this means 13/1000” over sized big end bore on the rod.
I did mic the id of rod bore, it was beyond the standard size.
of cause std size bearing on the rod means very loose clearance.
I think no after market over sized (bore side) bearing anyway.
Last edited by rust samurai; Nov 23, 2022 at 06:44 PM.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.