When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Primarily just a revised plenum design... This is the type I would've liked to have done in the beginning and had actually started building one but wound up being too tall. So, I built the box-style for expediency and though it works fine it isn't the optimum for airflow. Many who have this manifold have inserted an angled piece to steer the air into the manifold rather than let it gather and shear it's way in; and it was a complaint by several as well. While I feel that the original design worked and worked well (I did flowbench test overall flow); I cannot ignore the self-known fact that air does not like to turn sharp corners. This was most apparent recently to me when a friend failed to realize as much of a gain on nitrous with the old plenum as he did with another manifold; he was using a typical NOS 5151 plate which sprayed to the back of the plenum instead of following the tract down into the intake. All of that has been rectified with this system. So...Here's the revised plenum. Additionally, I've revised the fuel feed/return/regulator layout and will post a pic of that later...
-Jeb
Last edited by jburnett; Dec 14, 2005 at 02:28 PM.
oh. I thought it might have been a test bed motor.
how does it perform on the intended motor?
Don't know yet... I've only flow tested the new plenum on a bench; it has slightly more flow than the original but none of the turbulence. I suspect that on a full-out motor you'll see a decent gain over the original design I had. The true test would be with a TPI style nitrous plate as I stated above.
-Jeb
Jeb,
What about the t-stat housing. I am in the process of moving to a Team G and a similar plenum assy, but had to totally revamp the housing area to make it work. What are you doing in that area?
Additionally, my fuel rails are mounted the same as yours, but I am considering adding some stanchions at the top of the ports to mount the fuel rails. Thoughts?
BTW, I have been running a mucho modified (top has been cut off, much welding & flow bench time) MRII.
Aaron, I cut and section the water passage on the manifold (as you can see by the weld and lower position) and then use an OEM TPI water neck that is also cut, sectioned, and rewelded.
As for the stanchions, considering how little pressure is seen on the rails the arrangement I have works perfectly. In fact if you notice on most converted EFI single planes the same arrangement is there except they're usually made of 1/2" bar stock instead of 1/2" round stock like I use. I've actually used the fuel rails to break the silicone seal when pulling the intake off a motor and they don't move. If it works why "fix" it?
Rodj, I haven't decided yet but it will be in line with what I was asking for the old style manifold.
I do believe large plenum volume is good in certain applications, my previous design had 60% more volume than this one does but the turbulence created was detrimental.
-Jeb
From: [Quote=WOEII] Is dried brown doodie powders man! [/Quote]
Jeb,
PM me or post a price.
I had a hell of time getting the original plenum to seal. It looks like you used a carb spacer and welded the new plenum to that. I was going to have that done to my plenum with a milled down spacer. It would have been a very tight fit.
It looks like in the plenum pictured you fabbed and welded on a cruise and throttle cable bracket, is that correct? And, is the throttle body in the same location as with the previous plenum? I had some minor clearance issues with my T-stat housing on the first go round.
Will there be enough hood clearance to squeeze in an N2O plate? I recall you saying this could be done with the jr., but not with the original plenum and the Super. Another thing I don't see is the drilled and tapped holes for vacuum and the IAT sensor in the rear of the plenum. Do you plan on, or would you be willing, to provide those?
The slight issue with there efi version is : The injector bungs protrude into the intake at the tops of the runner. This happens to be the most important aspect of the flow and jebs does not protrude or block air flow.
The slight issue with there efi version is : The injector bungs protrude into the intake at the tops of the runner. This happens to be the most important aspect of the flow and jebs does not protrude or block air flow.
aaah. i knew there had to be a reason to go threw all the extra work. i didnt realize there was an issue with the efi intakes. not that i ever doubted jeb, just wondering.
can i use the same stock style injectors with this setup?