When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
To anyone that has ever replaced the Throttle Position Sensor on a 1985 Coupe -
Where the two screws go, does the new TPS have slots, so that you can adjust the TPS?
I am asking because I do not know if the TPS that I removed last week was the original one. The old one and the one that I installed had the slots for adjustment. The chevy dealership here in Houston told me that the one that they sell doesn't have slots, just two holes. That way, the TPS can not be adjusted. (At least he thinks it only has two holes. They don't have one in stock right now, so they can't verify, one way or the other.)
I was sure that I adjusted it correctly. I set it to 0.525. Even rechecked it, once I had tightened it.
What I have found out is some have slots some do not, my 90 had 2 holes. I think that should really be done after, and in conguntion with adjusting the IAC (min. air adjustment).
After min. air adjustment (IAC out of the picture first) then reconnected, checking the TPS on mine showed .64 volts, took it of slotted it with a dremel carbide tip and re-set. When I set it without running at .54 when running it showed a gain on a scanner to .56. those numbers are all in range to spec however +-6, regardless will still show 0 throttle angle when running at idle.
Rough idle is a product of many different things that may play a part. Dirty TB, dirty injectors, a vaccum leak, old plugs and on and on.
Normally, if a TB is dirty, can this be determined by looking through the butterfly opening? Looking through mine, it looks pretty clean, no carbon build-up. (I know that you can't see the entire innards of the TB this way, but I am just wondering.)
The spec for 86 is .54 volts +/- .075 This means that any setting from .615 to .465 is still within spec.
Most posts I've read on this and other Forums and from my own personal experience in trying different settings shows that a slightly higher setting - in the range of .61 - gives the best throttle response and performance.
I've gone as high as .65 with no really noticable downside. Chances are that anything much higher than .65 will cause a high TPS voltage SES code to set.
Try different settings and see which one you like best.
I cannot conceive of all the wrong answers associated with such a simple question. The 1984 through 1989s had adjustable TPSs. From 1990 and up, they are fixed. The ECM reads the minimum setting and accepts and establishes that as closed throttle.
The IAC adjustment is easily made with a volt meter and there is no reason for the engine to be running. My FSM says key, "On", engine, "Off".
Much higher than spec settings makes the throttle more sensitive. The additional sensitivity, and corresponding perception of throttle response MAY be mistaken for an increase in performance or power. It isn't.
The ECM reads the minimum setting and accepts and establishes that as closed throttle.
The IAC adjustment is easily made with a volt meter and there is no reason for the engine to be running. My FSM says key, "On", engine, "Off".
Much higher than spec settings makes the throttle more sensitive. The additional sensitivity, and corresponding perception of throttle response MAY be mistaken for an increase in performance or power. It isn't.
RACE ON!!!
I know you meant TPS ......I agree with what you have said (said similar earlier).
Jake,
I am interested in knowing how that by increasing voltage setting at the TPS would create throttle response?
What action is the ECM taking when seeing a higher voltage reading?
CFI-EFI:
I mean no disrespect, but changing the TPS voltage does do something. It is not negated and zeroed out at each restart.
If you don't believe me, then I guess TPIS are a bunch of crackpots.
And Insider Hints is a book about of lies.
It does make a difference on MAF L98 cars. Changes mixture.
Mixture yes, wether you set the TPS voltage at.5 or .6+ it does not change throttle angle (remains 0%), and that is correct.
I know you meant TPS ......I agree with what you have said (said similar earlier).
You are correct. I didn't catch that yesterday when I wrote it, but it jumped out at me as wrong the instant I saw it, today. I guess I was a little excited over all the errors when I typed that post.
Originally Posted by Duntov85
CFI-EFI:
I mean no disrespect, but changing the TPS voltage does do something. It is not negated and zeroed out at each restart.
Did you READ my post? The ECM DOES take the low reading from the TPS as closed throttle... on the 1990 and up, non-adjustable TPS cars. If you don't buy that your argument isn't with me, it's with GM.
Originally Posted by Duntov85
If you don't believe me, then I guess TPIS are a bunch of crackpots. And Insider Hints is a book about of lies.
I am not aware of what TPiS has said, nor the, "Insider Hints". If either backs that "throttle enhancer" that plugs into the TPS wiring, I'd have to admit that you are right.
I stand by my position. Adjusting a non-adjustable (fixed) TPS on a car built to use it, will have no effect on performance.