When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Today myself and forum member/dyno owner TJ Wong set out to find the truth regarding C4 air intakes. We dyno tested 3 different air intakes on my Lingenfelter 368cid LT5. Tested today were: stock with paper element, stock with K&N element and a cut lid, and finally SLP's "claw" tri-cone filter design. All dyno pulls were made with starting coolant temps at 195 degrees F. Here are the results.
Stock with paper, two identical pulls: 477rwhp. Avg. peak HP 477
Stock with K&N and cut lid, three pulls: 471, 475, 480rwhp. Avg. peak HP 475.3
SLP tri-cone "claw", three pulls: 477, 478, 481rwhp. Avg. peak HP 478.7
It would appear that the naysayers are mostly correct about C4 air intakes, not much to be gained here. Both Tom and I were rather suprised with the results. We had expected to see some small but visible gains with the cut-lid and SLP, instead we got a bunch of tests with peak numbers being basically the same or well within normal dyno pull to pull variation. The SLP unit does seem to have a small advantage over the others but suprisingly it's in mid range power not peak (see dyno graph average power #'s).
Interesting you brought this up as there have been quite a few threads regarding the claw intake lately. Always good to see dyno proven results vs. speculation.
1. Unblocking the filter would help i.e. cut lid, results = no measurable difference on the dyno. I wouldn't have believed it but those little slats cut into the air box lid can support 477rwhp at 7200rpms.
2. Clean K&N filter would outflow new paper by a small margin, results = no measurable difference.
3. SLP claw would gain some upper rpm power by being internally cleaner i.e. fewer/more gradual twists and turns, results = no measurable gain in peak HP but a gain of about 5 average HP and a small but noticeable hump in torque from 4000 to 5500rpm. This was supported by all three pulls with the SLP (indicating a trend) not just the one graph shown.
I plan on keeping the SLP. Besides having a very small average power advantage it's a nice quality piece and it being metal I can powder coat it to match my engine. Also it has good potential to be a true cold air intake by using a cut out fan shroud and some sheetmetal for a homemade scoop.
Anyhow I thought you guys would like to see some real test results on this subject seeing as it has been the matter of so much speculation.
Robert, why does the AFR go from 12.5 to 13.3 on max readings between the k&n and the sllp? Oh, and thank you for taking the time to test and share this with us.
Robert, why does the AFR go from 12.5 to 13.3 on max readings between the k&n and the sllp? Oh, and thank you for taking the time to test and share this with us.
It's just a spike at the very beginning of the run, probably I was a little slower getting on the gas than on the other runs.
I would have expected to see a little more gain than that... but your results don't nessisarly suprize me. I don't trust what is said on the interenet to much unless I've tried it personally or i've seen a subjective test like this done.
Rob take that to the track and get some real world numbers...The DA yesterday at 2-3PM was in the -1300 range. Air Quality plays a big part in your other dyno day.
Rob take that to the track and get some real world numbers...The DA yesterday at 2-3PM was in the -1300 range. Air Quality plays a big part in your other dyno day.
It looks like they where all tested on the same day.
That is just about what I would expect to see. I have often started I like my SLP but I did not think it would give any power over the cut lid. To be fair though unless you let the car cool down between runs it is not complaetly fair.
And how often are you allowed to sit on the side of the road and wait until coolant temps get low before you romp on it.
As long as it had the same oil and coolant temps then it is a fair test. As far as the second comment that was not the point. The point was if you roll in with good oil temp but a coolant temp of 177 then make several pulls and the last set of pulls was with the coolant temp of 225 it makes a big difference.
On lesser output motor, the results don't surprise me that much, as the later air filters and boxes are pretty large. I sort of expect to see some difference given the output of given your HP though. IMO Mostly the Dyno results diffferences were probably due to the slight air fuel ratio changes. I wonder if you drove around for the ECM to learn and compensate would you have seen any difference (or if the chip was recalibrate for each air box).
From: San Diego , CA Double Yellow DirtBags 1985..Z51..6-speed
Originally Posted by vader86
I'm aware that they arent ram-air.
And I still say that unblocking the filter yields HP.
Yeah, but I thought you were making a point that the filter location would give you either benefit you in terms of air temperature or air pressure.
It seems to me that on the highway, all these would suck in the same air temperature, and will all see the same pressure. Based on this, the low restriction filters should show the same % increase whether on the highway or not.