C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

Intake question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 5, 2006 | 03:49 PM
  #1  
silver86's Avatar
silver86
Thread Starter
Drifting
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Liked
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,309
Likes: 20
From: Woodstock Georgia
Default Intake question

I have a TPIS BM lower, ported plenum and edelbrock runners. I'm adding a Carroll blower system, and was wondering if it would be better to stay with the stock intake.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2006 | 07:07 PM
  #2  
AKS Racing's Avatar
AKS Racing
Safety Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,525
Likes: 2
From: Houston TX
Default

To see more indicated boost , go back to the stock intake. To see lower indicated boost, but more power go with the aftermarket components.

Bottom line, stay with what you have.

Aaron
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 03:39 PM
  #3  
TPI's Avatar
TPI
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Woodland California
Default

Some one posted recently that a L98 with blower & accel super ram intake produced too much low end tork to be practicle. Your set up should produce more low end tork than the super ram. A friend has a 434 cu in L98 with super ram, & makes the same complaint & plans on a TPIS mini ram (similar to LT1/LT4 intake) I have heard of using a modified LT1 manifolde on L98, & there is a web site about this. Hopefully, others with experience will post about this.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 03:58 PM
  #4  
mn_vette's Avatar
mn_vette
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,293
Likes: 79
From: Jackson MI
Default

Originally Posted by TPI
Some one posted recently that a L98 with blower & accel super ram intake produced too much low end tork to be practicle. Your set up should produce more low end tork than the super ram. A friend has a 434 cu in L98 with super ram, & makes the same complaint & plans on a TPIS mini ram (similar to LT1/LT4 intake) I have heard of using a modified LT1 manifolde on L98, & there is a web site about this. Hopefully, others with experience will post about this.

HA HA HA HA HA too much torque HA HA HA HA
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 05:08 PM
  #5  
86VX1's Avatar
86VX1
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
From: bakersfield cali
Default

too much torque?

thats like saying having too big a ***** is a bad thing
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 05:21 PM
  #6  
TPI's Avatar
TPI
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Woodland California
Default

Originally Posted by mn_vette
HA HA HA HA HA too much torque HA HA HA HA
Dont laugh untill you have tried it. I didn't say "too much tork" I said two others with experience with plenum & long runners complained "too much tork" , "cant put on big enough tires to hook up". What is your experience?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 05:22 PM
  #7  
TPI's Avatar
TPI
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Woodland California
Default

Originally Posted by 86VX1
too much torque?

thats like saying having too big a ***** is a bad thing
Ditto above. What is your experience?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 08:51 PM
  #8  
AKS Racing's Avatar
AKS Racing
Safety Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,525
Likes: 2
From: Houston TX
Default

Originally Posted by TPI
Some one posted recently that a L98 with blower & accel super ram intake produced too much low end tork to be practicle. Your set up should produce more low end tork than the super ram. A friend has a 434 cu in L98 with super ram, & makes the same complaint & plans on a TPIS mini ram (similar to LT1/LT4 intake) I have heard of using a modified LT1 manifolde on L98, & there is a web site about this. Hopefully, others with experience will post about this.
I recently posted on here that with my motor and the large blower with the SR, the combo made too much torque. Following that conclusion, I switched to a MRII, but found that it did not make much difference, though I picked up some RWHP on the top.

I do believe that there is such thing as too much torque. I have run 147+MPH on the far end of the 1/4 mile, with a 2.7 sec '60' (11.0 time) on slicks. These are nasty times, and I needed to do something about that (though people think smoke down the track is cool). I modified the suspension, moved to the MR, played with the cam advance, then messed with the tuning. My 60' are better (in the 1.55 - 1.85 sec) depending on tires and track conditiond. But unfortunately, I can not assess much of that from the switch from the SR to the MRII.

Keep in mind, this is for a large motor with a big blower.

Aaron
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 08:17 AM
  #9  
silver86's Avatar
silver86
Thread Starter
Drifting
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Liked
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,309
Likes: 20
From: Woodstock Georgia
Default

Well....I already have a hell of a time breakin' em loose now with the factory size rims and tires and only minor mods so far. I bought some ZR1 size rims and tires, more for coolness than any possible chance of helping me hook this thing up.

My cam choice increases low end torque as well (in part to help offset the large parasitic drag of the older blower while cruising around town, I'll post specs when I can find them) and maxes out at around 5200rpm, about where I figure things will start to go bad with the runner setup and the older SN60 blower.

I've resigned myself to most likely sticking with the 2.59 ratio in the rear (anything more and, given the amount of rain we have down here, it might get down right scary {not that I ever drive it in the rain} so I guess I need to sell these 3.56's, huh?) and probably a 2500-3000 stall. The motor, outside of new springs and increased rocker ratio and cam, will be all stock, save for the intake swap and long-tube headers.

Last edited by silver86; Mar 8, 2006 at 08:20 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 06:20 PM
  #10  
TPI's Avatar
TPI
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Woodland California
Default

Originally Posted by silver86
Well....I already have a hell of a time breakin' em loose now with the factory size rims and tires and only minor mods so far. I bought some ZR1 size rims and tires, more for coolness than any possible chance of helping me hook this thing up.

My cam choice increases low end torque as well (in part to help offset the large parasitic drag of the older blower while cruising around town, I'll post specs when I can find them) and maxes out at around 5200rpm, about where I figure things will start to go bad with the runner setup and the older SN60 blower.

I've resigned myself to most likely sticking with the 2.59 ratio in the rear (anything more and, given the amount of rain we have down here, it might get down right scary {not that I ever drive it in the rain} so I guess I need to sell these 3.56's, huh?) and probably a 2500-3000 stall. The motor, outside of new springs and increased rocker ratio and cam, will be all stock, save for the intake swap and long-tube headers.
My 86 with super ram & 1.6:1 rollers, otherwise stock, will rev to about 5200 RPM as well. I had a mini ram & same RPM's. Was 4400 before the manifold change. TPIS, maker of the mini ram, claims 6500 RPm "pulling strong all the way" with their custom tune. Accel says no tune needed with their super ram. My question is, will our modified L98's rev to 6500 RPM, pulling all the way, with a custom tune, or is TPIS passing gas? Does your motor max out at 5200 RPM due to characteristics of your motor, or is it tunning? Anyone have experience on this?
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 10:27 PM
  #11  
AKS Racing's Avatar
AKS Racing
Safety Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,525
Likes: 2
From: Houston TX
Default

The SR seems to perform well to 5600 - 5800, while the MRII seems to be fine to 6000 - 6200. With FI, the MRII has no issue with 6600 (RWHP continued to climb).

There must have been something wrong in your combo if the MRII would not pull past 5200. Was this still the stock cam?

Aaron
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 02:17 PM
  #12  
TPI's Avatar
TPI
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Woodland California
Default

Originally Posted by AKS Racing
The SR seems to perform well to 5600 - 5800, while the MRII seems to be fine to 6000 - 6200. With FI, the MRII has no issue with 6600 (RWHP continued to climb).

There must have been something wrong in your combo if the MRII would not pull past 5200. Was this still the stock cam?

Aaron
They both would rev past 5200, but would go slower. The mini ram would pop & sputter like it was lean. The SR will keep reving higher, but slower & sounds strained & slower speed at the end of my approximate 1/4 mi. test strip. Yes, stock cam. I also found that it runs better & more low end tork with the stock throttle body compared to a 58mm TB with the SR. Only used 58mm with MR. Also with stock prom on both. Is it the tunning, or something else? Am I getting what you would expect, or should it pull strongly to 5600-5800 RPM? Same question for the thred starter "silver 86"?

Last edited by TPI; Mar 9, 2006 at 02:21 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 10:14 PM
  #13  
AKS Racing's Avatar
AKS Racing
Safety Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,525
Likes: 2
From: Houston TX
Default

Originally Posted by TPI
They both would rev past 5200, but would go slower. The mini ram would pop & sputter like it was lean. The SR will keep reving higher, but slower & sounds strained & slower speed at the end of my approximate 1/4 mi. test strip. Yes, stock cam. I also found that it runs better & more low end tork with the stock throttle body compared to a 58mm TB with the SR. Only used 58mm with MR. Also with stock prom on both. Is it the tunning, or something else? Am I getting what you would expect, or should it pull strongly to 5600-5800 RPM? Same question for the thred starter "silver 86"?
Neither of these intakes will perform well if the car is not tuned to match the intake. Stock ECM with aftermarket intake yields low performance.

TPI, are you the guy that had issues with a '96 and a blower? And now you are having issues with mod parts on an '86? I might be throwing the match about now.

Aaron
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 08:36 AM
  #14  
silver86's Avatar
silver86
Thread Starter
Drifting
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Liked
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,309
Likes: 20
From: Woodstock Georgia
Default

I haven't thrashed this 86 out yet (only put 400 miles on it so far), but I will answer with what I saw on a previous 85 that I built. I actually pulled a motor from a 1990 Greenwood that had been bored .030, with fully ported heads with 2.02/1.6, ported factory lower intake, large runners, ported plenum and 52mm TB. I also ran LT stainless headers, gutted cat, and borla's, but never got the chance to change the diff from the 2.56's. I installed a custom grind Crane cam (I'll see if I can find the spec card), 1.5 RR, decked the heads .020 and stuffed it all into my 85 without changing the tune (I know, right?!).

If I remember correctly, my shift points at the strip were between 5700-5800 and ran 13.09@109 with a 2.02/60, a bad valve body locking me out of first gear (at least I didn't have to worry about tirespin) and on GS-C's. Maximum power seemed to hit in the low 5000 range and didn't drop until the high 5700's, but incredible torque throughout the rpm range. Sorry this is kinda vague, but this was 10 years ago. The main point is that I was seeing hefty power still in the mid to upper 5000 rpm's. Mid 4000 power peeks would send me looking for fuel pressure problems, clogged exhaust (if the cat was still on), or spark issues.

On the clogged exhaust note, I had a 93 Formula with these mods: headers, 3.73's, CAI, chip (speed density), Borla tunable exhaust, and pulley...I was still only pulling 13.9's@98 on streets. I took the car back to the header installer, and we found the cat had basically melted. We gutted and promptly went to 13.4's@103 still on the streets.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 02:56 PM
  #15  
TPI's Avatar
TPI
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Woodland California
Default

Originally Posted by AKS Racing
Neither of these intakes will perform well if the car is not tuned to match the intake. Stock ECM with aftermarket intake yields low performance.

TPI, are you the guy that had issues with a '96 and a blower? And now you are having issues with mod parts on an '86? I might be throwing the match about now.

Aaron
Yes, but the 86 runs much stronger with the super ram, 5 mph faster in 1/4 mi. I will get a custom tune after I put on my new headers. The 96 LT4 is a longer story explained in other posts. Currently I am awaiting delivery of a 383 short block which I will run NA untill I can get the parts and info to run without an FMU. See my other posts for why.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Intake question





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:54 AM.

story-0
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-1
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-3
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE