When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
well... judging from your comment, you really have no clue what this is about!
I don't mean that in a bad way, just observationally speaking.
The ZF6 is a much more modern gearbox than the 4+3. Where the 4+3 has an external gear change and linkage, the ZF has an internal shifter.
The ZF and 4+3 are the same length, but none of the existing components, save the c-beam, will transfer.
As I understand it, you will need the ZF bell housing, hydraulics and clutch assembly.
I will warn you, the ZF is NOT a quiet gearbox. you will get idle rattles... but you might also get droning from the gearbox... it's a pain, really.
The person to talk to regarding this conversion is CentralCoaster. Infact, if you do a search on him here in C4 Tech, you will find his threads regarding this conversion.
Something to consider, Kiesler Engineering has the TKO 5spd available... the 5th gear OD is about the same ratio as 4th gear with OD engaged on the 4+3. The cost is about $3k, complete.
I drove a ZF6 the other day. Yes the tranny is smoother, but its not that much smoother for me to spend $3000-$4000. There is something about the 4+3, It keeps it original, and there arent many out there. I can shift just as fast as a ZF6 with my 4+3. I installed the short throw linkage, I think it helped.
Last edited by 88BlackZ-51; Apr 16, 2006 at 08:21 AM.
I drove a ZF6 the other day. Yes the tranny is smoother, but its not that much smoother for me to spend $3000-$4000. There is something about the 4+3, It keeps it original, and there arent many out there. I can shift just as fast as a ZF6 with my 4+3. I installed the short throw linkage, I think it helped.
Sorry. After having lived with a 4+3 for 20years, there's no comparison.
And the short throw linkage is a POS IMHO.
Thanks everyone for the input. I'm just posing the question for a hypothetical situation. I looked at an '87 vert with the 4+3 last night. I was just wondering how difficult it would be to change to a ZF at some point if I bought a 4+3 car. It seems like it would be much easier to convert a 4+3 to a ZF than to convert an auto to a ZF. You would already have the pedals, console trim, hole in the floor, D44 and so on. I'm probably going to hold out for an '89 vert with a ZF. However, this could be useful information for anyone wanting to do the swap.
I will warn you, the ZF is NOT a quiet gearbox. you will get idle rattles... but you might also get droning from the gearbox... it's a pain, really.
You only get rattles or "clutch chatter" if you convert to a single mass flywheel. If you have the stock dual mass, its as quiet as any other tranny.
I had a dual mass for many miles and 2 clutches. I converted to a single mass (and clutch 4 now) and it chatters like crazy in neutral... I was told that even before I had it installed... it doesn't bother the car, but it's a bit embarrasing sometimes when the chatter is noisier than the nice cam lope sound ...and you have to explain to people "umm theres nothing wrong with it, its just the ZF6 and a single mass flywheel"
i love mine though, but NOBODY wants to work on them, much less has anyone know what they are...they have like 3x the parts as any of the other trannies from what I understand.
Dude, keep it a 4+3. I've gone from one to a Richmond 6spd and the gear noise made my vette sound like a diesel truck. This is something everyone failed to mention to me before the conversion. The richmond is more than rock solid but my car is a vette...not a racing car. I went back to the 4+3 (not an easy counter-conversion). Had the 4+3 rebuilt. Had the OD rebuilt. Now I enjoy the quiet of a sports car transmission. If and when I break it....I will have it rebuilt. Nothing lasts forever, and as most people willl bash this tranny, I PRAISE IT. Properly rebuilt, properly maintained, and most of all the linkage propertly lubed and ADJUSTED it will be a joy to drive. The 4 speed is basically the same as any other GM 4 speed out there. The OD should be disengaged when dueling.
Anybody want a a richmond 6spd with less than 150 miles on it? For sale. Whole kit.
You only get rattles or "clutch chatter" if you convert to a single mass flywheel. If you have the stock dual mass, its as quiet as any other tranny.
I had a dual mass for many miles and 2 clutches. I converted to a single mass (and clutch 4 now) and it chatters like crazy in neutral... I was told that even before I had it installed... it doesn't bother the car, but it's a bit embarrasing sometimes when the chatter is noisier than the nice cam lope sound ...and you have to explain to people "umm theres nothing wrong with it, its just the ZF6 and a single mass flywheel"
i love mine though, but NOBODY wants to work on them, much less has anyone know what they are...they have like 3x the parts as any of the other trannies from what I understand.
They are rock solid though.
the DM is a bitch to put on an L98 that didn't come with. It's balanced to the motor, so you would have to figure out the balancing issues...
Dude, keep it a 4+3. I've gone from one to a Richmond 6spd and the gear noise made my vette sound like a diesel truck. This is something everyone failed to mention to me before the conversion. The richmond is more than rock solid but my car is a vette...not a racing car. I went back to the 4+3 (not an easy counter-conversion). Had the 4+3 rebuilt. Had the OD rebuilt. Now I enjoy the quiet of a sports car transmission. If and when I break it....I will have it rebuilt. Nothing lasts forever, and as most people willl bash this tranny, I PRAISE IT. Properly rebuilt, properly maintained, and most of all the linkage propertly lubed and ADJUSTED it will be a joy to drive. The 4 speed is basically the same as any other GM 4 speed out there. The OD should be disengaged when dueling.
Anybody want a a richmond 6spd with less than 150 miles on it? For sale. Whole kit.
The stock tranny in a C5 C6 and Viper is the same tranny in your kit, granted the ratios are a little diffrent, but maybe there is a problem with that particular trans? As I've never heard any other T56 owner talk about noise like that?
I will warn you, the ZF is NOT a quiet gearbox. you will get idle rattles... but you might also get droning from the gearbox... it's a pain, really.
You may have had a noisy trans... it must be the exception, not the rule for the ZF box. My last 4 vettes have been black label ZFs ( the noisy ones as some have complained ) None of mine have ever been noisy till I ran an ORR with Redline in the trans... That made it noisy permanantly until it gets rebuilt !
I have replaced it with a blue label trans, the quieter of the 2 models due to gear angle... It sounds no different that my 100K mile 89 ZF daily driver...
BTW... I had a 4+3 back in 89... my only problem was losing the OD right after I bought it with 42K on it... Probably because the original owner never changed the fluid and filter.
IMHO the ZF is the better way to go if your motivated to work through the conversion process.