When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die
St. Jude Donor '04-'05-'06-'07
340 is what the little plaque on my console says. And yes I know that those plaques aren't factory. And I also know that it's not even close to accurate anymore.
Is the calculation the same for hp? I'd like to be able to compare dyno charts of my car with factory gearing to one with 4.10 gears. Also, can these adjustments be made on the dyno so the chart reads correct?
Is the calculation the same for hp? I'd like to be able to compare dyno charts of my car with factory gearing to one with 4.10 gears. Also, can these adjustments be made on the dyno so the chart reads correct?
The simple answer to you question is NO....
Rear wheel torque equals motor torque times the overall gear ratio....
Rear wheel horsepower equals motor horsepower.....
Rear wheel rpm equals motor rpm divided by the overall gear ratio...
To confuse the issue even more, on dyno test data rear wheel torque is actually numerically motor torque even tho it is called rear wheel torque........what we are really saying by rear wheel torque is this is how much motor torque we have after driveline losses ....
Overall gear ratio is the transmission ratio times the rear end ratio
I've been trying to do my research. Most everything I’ve found states this about the LT1:
1992: 300 hp @ 5000 rpm, 330 ft-lb tq @ 4000 rpm (CAC has the 93 the same as the 92...copy/paste error I think)
1993-1995: 300 hp @ 5000 rpm, 340 ft-lb tq @ 3600 rpm
1995: 300 hp @ 5000 rpm, 335 ft-lb tq @ 4000 rpm
MPI (Multi-port Injection): 1992-1993
SPI (Sequential port Injection): 1994-1996
• Horsepower for the base LT1 engine remained 300, but three changes made the engine quieter. First, the heat shield design changed from a single-piece stamping to a two-piece sandwich type that was self-damping. Second, new thermoset polyester valve covers with "isolated" mounts replaced 1992's magnesium covers. Third' the LT1 camshaft exhaust lobe profile was modified to reduce the exhaust valve closing velocity. Also, a shortening of the inlet duration permitted more duration for the exhaust so there was no increase in overlap area. Emissions and idle quality weren't adversely affected. A side benefit of closing the inlet valve sooner was an increase in torque from 330 to 340 lb.-ft at 3600 rpm.
Last edited by stearnman; May 5, 2006 at 12:44 PM.