When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Honestly, I would stay away from nearly anything that Holley makes. They make some pretty parts, but they really should stick to carbs, their CQ is lacking in many areas.
Not that you asked at all, but why do you need one? It is much better to adjust your fuel in your tune than it is to mess with the fuel pressure. Tweaking fuel pressure alone is a "hack" way to tune at best.
Not that you asked at all, but why do you need one? It is much better to adjust your fuel in your tune than it is to mess with the fuel pressure. Tweaking fuel pressure alone is a "hack" way to tune at best.
Good question. Based on what I've read/heard, it's a beneficial addition to "our" cars. Even Trevor @ EM recommended that I get one some time back...
If your stock FPR is working, there is absolutely no reason to replace it and mess with the fuel pressure. The AFPR only allows you to make global changes to your air / fuel ratio. During normal closed loop operation your computer will either have to add or subtract fuel to compensate which will screw up your BLM values, and it will mess up your fuel economy readings on the computer, etc.
Say you're running fine at WOT at 4000 RPM but rich at 5000 RPM's. If you drop the fuel pressure enough to bring it into line at 5000 RPM's, you've just made it lean at 4000 RPM's. The much better solution is to modify the computer to have it just trim down the fuel at 5000 RPM's and not mess with 4000 RPM's.
There are a lot of "tuners" out there who will sell you a bunch of gimmicks, but the ones who really know what they are doing will tell you that you don't need it. The only reason you might want to raise your fuel pressure is to get more flow out of a set of smaller fuel injectors, but even this should be accompanied with a new computer program.
Not the hijack:
My 86 is running rich in all phases. I had thought about getting a AFPR because my fuel pressure is 42 psi. If I could lower the pressure to say 36 psi it should help with the rich situation..right?
Not the hijack:
My 86 is running rich in all phases. I had thought about getting a AFPR because my fuel pressure is 42 psi. If I could lower the pressure to say 36 psi it should help with the rich situation..right?
Yes, no, maybe. You said your fuel pressure is 42 PSI, when? Is this at idle, cruise, wide open throttle? Your factory fuel pressure should control fuel pressure inversely with vacuum. IE, the more vacuum your engine pulls the less fuel pressure you should have. My car is modified so at idle it doesn't pull as much vacuum as stock, but I can still watch my fuel pressure vary between 38 at idle at around 46 or so at WOT. If I let off the gas at WOT and slam the throttle shut, the vacuum is very high and it'll suck the pressure down to around 34 or so.
If you're running 42 PSI all the time, I would start by checking to see if the vacuum line going to your regulator is cracked or broken. You can try using a vacuum pump to pull a vacuum on the regulator to see if you can manually lower the pressure, etc. If the regulator is working properly and it's still too rich, then you might consider getting an adjustable regulator, otherwise you're treating a symptom, not a cause.
If your stock FPR is working, there is absolutely no reason to replace it and mess with the fuel pressure. The AFPR only allows you to make global changes to your air / fuel ratio. During normal closed loop operation your computer will either have to add or subtract fuel to compensate which will screw up your BLM values, and it will mess up your fuel economy readings on the computer, etc.
Say you're running fine at WOT at 4000 RPM but rich at 5000 RPM's. If you drop the fuel pressure enough to bring it into line at 5000 RPM's, you've just made it lean at 4000 RPM's. The much better solution is to modify the computer to have it just trim down the fuel at 5000 RPM's and not mess with 4000 RPM's.
There are a lot of "tuners" out there who will sell you a bunch of gimmicks, but the ones who really know what they are doing will tell you that you don't need it. The only reason you might want to raise your fuel pressure is to get more flow out of a set of smaller fuel injectors, but even this should be accompanied with a new computer program.
If the car is running right, don't mess with it.
1st off, thx for the informative response.
I did have my PCM re-tuned after the HC install and the car seems to run great and on a recent dyno run my AFR seemed fine. With that said, I guess you sensibly talked me out of the purchase...
If your stock FPR is working, there is absolutely no reason to replace it and mess with the fuel pressure.
Aeromotive is the best AFPR for the LT1 cars but I removed mine long ago and it is still collecting dust in a box over in my storage shed. As Nathan said all corrections can be made via the tune and there is no reason to touch the stock FP. First thing you really should do is take a look at your A/F ratio before you change anything. A wideband is the best but logging data with TTS or Freescan will also work.
Aeromotive is the best AFPR for the LT1 cars but I removed mine long ago and it is still collecting dust in a box over in my storage shed.
Doesn't the Aeromotive require modifications to the fuel rail covers? I know Aeromotive certainly has the best looking unit out there, but I've heard of fitment issues.
Doesn't the Aeromotive require modifications to the fuel rail covers? I know Aeromotive certainly has the best looking unit out there, but I've heard of fitment issues.
No, I have the Aeromotive and it's an easy install.
However, after I bought it I heard a few stories of them leaking and not holding pressure. I bought it during my rich condition issue earlier this year, and now that the issue is solved I'll probably go back to stock.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.