When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The '91 failed the emissions test earlier today here were the readings:
High Speed:
HC 120=standard vette=28
CO 0.67=std. vette=0.02
Nox 848=std. vette=845
Dilution (%) >6.0= std. vette=14.0
Low Speed:
HC 124=std. vette=60
CO 0.69=std. vette=0.03 Nox 937=std. VETTE=1477
Dil. (%) >6.0=std vette=14.1
The emissions guy said that the temp seemed really high (~235) when they were doing the test and that might be a source of elevated Nox...is that true? My car has stock cam/internals with Accel runners and Accel base, muffler eliminators, eliminated pre-cats, 2000 stall B&M converter, and a one year old carsound catalytic converter. The smog pump has also been eliminated although the car has passed before without it or the pre-cats.
Any suggestions for reducing Nox would be greatly appreciated as would any potential sources of an elevated reading. Do any of the additives at auto stores that help in emissions reduce Nox or just hydrocarbons and CO?
TIA
NOx is aggravated by high combustion temps. The EGR valve lowers the combustion chamber temps by introducing an inert gas (exhaust) to reduce the temps. The EGR isn't likely the fault. Your NOx is borderline at at high speed, where the EGR is supposed to be open, and way over when it is supposed to be close at idle. Your HCs and COs are SO low, especially rhe CO, that I suspect an excessively lean mixture is causing higher combustion temps and therefore the high NOx number at idle. I would double check that the timing is properly set and spend the rest of my time looking for vacuum leaks.
Thanks for your quick response. I will check for vacuum leaks and make sure that the timing is set correctly. I truely value your wisdom and you sharing it about the Corvette.
I hope it proves fruitful. The vacuum leak(s) may be small and elusive, but I am reasonably confidant... The "quickness" was just a matter of being at the right place at the right time. Good luck, and...
Retarding the timing to the point at which the exhaust valve opens before combustion is completed should reduce NOx and HCs, but will negatively impact fuel economy.
As a temporary measure it may get you to pass. Has your timing been advanced either via chip or an increase in base timing.
I just got the car re-tested after adding the seafoam additive and kept both fans on via the manual fan switch that we had added several years ago. The Nox readings went down to like 145 on the high speed and around 550 on the low speed. So it passed without any EGR work or timing changes although those would have probably lowered these numbers even more. Thanks for everyone's input.
Bogus, What type of problems are you possibly seeing indicated here ?Injector leaking , bad o2's , vacuum leak, egr problem,timing off?
This is my sons car,He got it @ 16 for being a straight A student since pre-school . He just graduated from " Trinity U ", still the only car he has ever owned. He will own it forever .
I suffered a similar problem last year with my '89. Turned out to be a bad EGR valve. After swapping it out, all my emissions readings came right down to normal.
I just got the car re-tested after adding the seafoam additive and kept both fans on via the manual fan switch that we had added several years ago. The Nox readings went down to like 145 on the high speed and around 550 on the low speed. So it passed without any EGR work or timing changes although those would have probably lowered these numbers even more. Thanks for everyone's input.
Congratulations. The Seafoam must have cleared out the EGR passages, which I didn't really think was the problem. The fans, of course, helped keep the temps down. Come to think of it, the Seafoam didn't affect the EGR operation for the low speed test, because the EGR is closed at idle. *I* don't think there are any lingering problems. It would appear that you fixed it with the Seafoam clean up. Did the COs come up any?
Bogus, What type of problems are you possibly seeing indicated here ?Injector leaking , bad o2's , vacuum leak, egr problem,timing off?
This is my sons car,He got it @ 16 for being a straight A student since pre-school . He just graduated from " Trinity U ", still the only car he has ever owned. He will own it forever .
I just think the numbers are still high... and there might be a build up in there, still.
If it was mine, I would just confirm a few things before putting the problem to bed... check the base timing and see where that, and the next time you have the intake apart, check the EGR...
At times, the best way to clean the intake and such is to hot tank it...
I had the exact same problem on my 95 last week. Fail emmisions on Nox, with really low Co2 and HC readings. Car was running too lean and combustion chamber temps too hot. My mechanic checked vaccum and it seemed okay. He ran a decarbonizer through the intake (GM stuff I think) and cleaned the rad of debris. It passed on the second attempt, but HC readings on the high side.
I had a guy in a Caddilac Catera in front of me who had the same problem. Mechanic clean out the rad and passed no problem.
Going to take it in next week to check if anything else.