When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Mid-America, and maybe Eckler's and some of the other 'Vette suppliers, sells a cross-bar type brace which installs in the halo of C4 coupes and which is supposedly to greatly help prevent chassis flex, twisting, etc. I am thinking about one of these for my '89 coupe, because I want to start driving it some with the roof panel removed. When I've done this before, the additional flex and torsional twist was noticeable, especially on curvy or bumpy roads, and in theory the cross bar would seem to help reduce this.
Has anyone installed one of these cross bars, and if so, do you think it would help reinforce the car for driving with the roof panel removed? I'm hesitant to be the guinea pig here because Mid-America's price for one is about $350.
Mid-America, and maybe Eckler's and some of the other 'Vette suppliers, sells a cross-bar type brace which installs in the halo of C4 coupes and which is supposedly to greatly help prevent chassis flex, twisting, etc. I am thinking about one of these for my '89 coupe, because I want to start driving it some with the roof panel removed. When I've done this before, the additional flex and torsional twist was noticeable, especially on curvy or bumpy roads, and in theory the cross bar would seem to help reduce this.
Has anyone installed one of these cross bars, and if so, do you think it would help reinforce the car for driving with the roof panel removed? I'm hesitant to be the guinea pig here because Mid-America's price for one is about $350.
Thanks for any info.
Contact Dave at R-D Racing (a forum vendor) and inquire about a Cross Brace. It is an "X"-shaped brace that mounts to the underside of your car to prevent the chassis flex that you are experiencing. The best part is, your car is already pre-drilled for the holes! Why? Convertibles came from the factory with a very similar piece already installed to increase tortional rigidity, and since the frames are the same, your car is already prepped to accept Dave's aftermarket part.
If you have any questions whatsoever about R-D Racing's reputation or their customer service, simply do a search - you'll find their reputation to be outstanding, and their products to be held in the highest regard. I have R-D's Camber Brace, and can't imagine Corvette life without it!!!
Which one are you asking about, theyre all made by R-D that are in that catalog.
Targa Truss goes in with the top off, Cross-bar goes behind your seats, X-brace goes under the car, and the Camber Brace goes between the motor and the radiator.
Thanks for the thoughts everybody. You've got me seriously considering the X-brace from R-D Racing which mounts underneath the car. Seems like that might help with overall chassis flex more than the cross-bar behind the seats.
I considered the Targa Truss but it ruins the clean lines when the roof is out, plus I don't want to have to bolt it/unbolt it every time I go topless.
The cross brace is not as effective as either the cross-bar behind the seats or the targa truss. The reinforcment provided by the latter two options is applied much further away from the basic frame and thus increases the section properties more. Not to say it wouldn't be enough for your needs, it's just less than the other two. The folks @ RD can probably explain the relative effectivity of each option.
I too have the cross-frame, the cross-bar and the camber brace and while they do improve the stiffness of the frame considerably, there is still a very noticeable cowl shake on anything but the smoothest roads with the roof out.
There are actually two versions of the support brace you are referring to. R&D's targa truss is one version and there is another called the AFSB (anti-flex support bar) that is sold through another vendor. A quick google search should yield you the place to purchase it. I went with the AFSB simply because I think it looks better, but my guess is functionally they work the same. It was supposed to be shipped out today, so I obviously can't give an opinion on its effectiveness yet -- but the general concensus from those that have used either version is they make a big improvement.
The advantage to both is that the support structure is actually stiffer than the roof panel and for those of us who are a bit tall (I'm 6'4") it gives us some room for a helmet on track days while actually improving chassis stiffness. -- The AFSB is a bit more expensive though....
Ive never even heard of that piece until now. I agree it is much nicer that it is a round bar instead of the square one r-d has. I wish these could stay in place with the roof on then i would buy one.
Ive never even heard of that piece until now. I agree it is much nicer that it is a round bar instead of the square one r-d has. I wish these could stay in place with the roof on then i would buy one.
The website seems to indicate that the fabricator is developing a soft top to go over it. I can't imagine that it would be water tight, but it is an interesting option.
The cross brace is not as effective as either the cross-bar behind the seats or the targa truss. The reinforcment provided by the latter two options is applied much further away from the basic frame and thus increases the section properties more. Not to say it wouldn't be enough for your needs, it's just less than the other two. The folks @ RD can probably explain the relative effectivity of each option.
Joe
Actually I just got an email response from Dave at R-D Racing this morning, he says I'll get the most bang for my buck with the "Cross Frame", which is their name for the X-brace. Now I'm really confused.