When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Just wondering if anyone ever figured out how to adjust the mileage computer after going to larger injectors. It was always optimistic but now it's about double what I'm really getting. Thought it would be fun to try & fine tune the code for it.
Yes that is the value we changed for my new 42 lb injectors (41.98 which work great by the way & a big thank you to Greg@blowerworks.net) but that didn't effect my mileage computer. It shows about 44 to 50 MPG & I'm actually getting about 1/2 that.
Thats cause your injectors are almost twice as big as they were from the factory. There is 2 settings, one is the injector flow rate which matters for tunning sake, and the other is DISPLAY injector flow which is different. Maybe the L98s were different in terms of ECM constants, but there will still be 2 setting there somewhere or your dash wouldnt show double the MPG due to there being double the flow capacity.
The '165 L98s have two different settings as well. The display one is the one you need to fix the mileage as previously said. The engine one is in pounds and the mileage one is in gallons.
Okay, I'll look again for that constant. Didn't see it in TunerPro but doesn't mean I didn't miss it. I can email/post or you can pick up the 8D layout if anyone cares to look over my "shoulder".
Well damn... just looked again & I don't see ANY constants for Display.
Okay, I need you to elaborate on what you just said...
ANHT_hac is something I've not seen/heard of before so lets start there.
And it sounds like you added a constant on your own in TunerPro, which that is the program I've been using so far to mod my bins for EGR delete, cooling fans off/on & now my injector flow update.
Just haven't gone so far as to add my own constant field definitions. If you can explain where, how etc. & define better what you wrote on those two Codes I would appreciate it.
The 90-91 Corvette uses the 122727 ECM. Inside it there is a 27256 EPROM that contains calibration data and the assembly program for fuel injection, spark advance and so on. Depending on you “application” there are different callibration/assemply programs. For example, the ANHT is for 90 Corvette with auto transmission and in my case I have AXCN which is for 91 with 6-speed. ANHT_hac is a translation of the EPROM into a commented assembly program and “tuning” parameters. The adresses of these parameters are specified by a “mask”, in case of the Corvette 1227727 it is named $8D.
You can find ANHT_hac on Moates site. Older Corvettes uses 1227165 ECM and in that case you can look at ARAP_hac which is for 89 Corvette ($6E mask and 27128 EPROM).
I added a constant “Injector flow [gal/hr]” at address 8824 (hex) and scaled it by a factor 0.032. To add a constant right click in the “constant/scalars window” in TunerPro and choose “Edit item”. Note that I have only found the factor 0.032 in one place so I have not confirmed it from a second source. In other words, can someone confirm/correct this factor please do so.
Good luck and don’t hesitate to ask more questions!
I have a tunerpro ecu file for my 87. The mpg readout is the last item listed in the constants.
Interesting! Do you use $6E ECU-file? Is it located at address C620 (hex) and has raw value 118 (dec)? What is your "conversion" factor to "calculated" values in the bin-definition file?
The is for a 6E arap bin. location is 70c. I just remembered seeing it and thought it may give you a place to look. I actually saved the file for a possible future use, but I have a pretty good chip done by someone else, so I never got that far. Remember, I have an 87 with the 165 ecm. Its likely different from yours.
The is for a 6E arap bin. location is 70c. I just remembered seeing it and thought it may give you a place to look.
Strange, calibration space is C000-C709 when I look at the ARAP_hac. If TunerPro says 70C for your ARAP.bin that would be outside the calibration area (according to ARAP_hac), I do not quite understand this.
In 32B, the display gallons/hr constant is located at location 712 with a default value of 122 (decimal) or 7A (hex). This raw value (in decimal)must be divided by 32 to convert to gallons/hour.
default value at LC712: 0x7A or 122/32 = 3.8125 gal/hr.
I'm currently using 8C (hex) at this location. 0x8C = 140 decimal.
140/32 = 4.375 gal/hr
This was changed to better fit my raised fuel pressure (54 psi).
Ok, Just checked 8D (anht_hac.pdf):
L8824: FCB 118 ( or 76 (hex)). Look for a hex value of 76 at location 824.
This is shown as 3.776 gal/hr, but 118/32 = 3.6875 gal/hr doesn't quite fit. However: 118 * 0.032 = 3.776 Bingo!.
I would simply scale up this value by the new injectors/old or 42/22 * 118 = 225 decimal or E1 (hex). The exact resolution? 0.032 or 1/32 (0.03125) doesn't really matter since this is a proportional change.
Last edited by tequilaboy; Aug 15, 2006 at 11:06 AM.
Looks like you guys have the right info to get me going. Unfortunately, I'm so tired tonight that my brain doesn't even want to coop. Too much time today trying to convert, merge & clean up a database in the County Assesors office... amazing how poorly end users can set up data structures, attempt to key the same data into 4 or 5 diff. tables & then can't figure out why the reports always have diff results... but then not say anything until 6 or 7 years worth of data has been input. duh
And a BIG thank you to both Tequillaboy & Corvette91. Tested the new entry on my bin on the way to work today & it works great. Very close but I will continue to test/compare mileage & adjust as needed.
Hijack time! Since the thread appears dormant, I'll ask a related question. How does this apply to a '94. I've got 42lbs inj too and it kinda bugs me that the trip computer is now useless. I would LOVE to get it working properly. I'll always thought that the BCM had an inj constant in it too and just read the PW from the PCM along with the speed/distance. Anybody know what to do in my case? I've got both LT1 edit and Tunercat. Thanks!
Scott
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.