Base timing question...
Not that I would ever leave the base timing at 3 degrees, but what's making the car wanna backfire, pop and stall out when I get on it with that low base timing? Isn't the base timing of those old F-bodies set at like 0 degrees???? Are TPIs really supposed to have at least 6 degrees of timing in order not to stall out?
RACE ON!!!
Then I set it up to 12 degrees like it has always been at and the car bacame 100% drivable again. I'll just have to use 89 octane from now on or it will ping. I've been filling up the car with 87 octane for the past couple of weeks... so maybe the combined effect of the 220 degree coolant temp, the timing and the low octane gas contributed to this pinging problem.
But I'm still confused as to why the car wouldn't idle worth a damn when I put the timing at 0 degrees....
RACE ON!!!
While trouble shooting a pining problem I had with my '85, I set the timing to 0*. It was a bandaid, but it worked in stopping the ping until I found the real cause of it & fixed the problem. Mine idled (not well, but it would idle).
You mentioned you stalled out when you drop the timing. If I'm remembering my posts right... didn't you say you introduced a vacuum leak into the system a long time ago? Would that not cause some stalling when the timing is dropped back to spec...
Last edited by mikey whipreck; Aug 14, 2006 at 09:27 PM.
While trouble shooting a pining problem I had with my '85, I set the timing to 0*. It was a bandaid, but it worked in stopping the ping until I found the real cause of it & fixed the problem. Mine idled (not well, but it would idle).
You mentioned you stalled out when you drop the timing. If I'm remembering my posts right... didn't you say you introduced a vacuum leak into the system a long time ago? Would that not cause some stalling when the timing is dropped back to spec...
Yes, the car would start up, but then stall immediately. Like I said, even when I was pushing the gas down, it didn't even rev up. The gas pedal had no effect.
While trouble shooting a pining problem I had with my '85, I set the timing to 0*. It was a bandaid, but it worked in stopping the ping until I found the real cause of it & fixed the problem. Mine idled (not well, but it would idle).
You mentioned you stalled out when you drop the timing. If I'm remembering my posts right... didn't you say you introduced a vacuum leak into the system a long time ago? Would that not cause some stalling when the timing is dropped back to spec...
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
You are starting to introduce new stuff, here, that wasn't in the opening post. I don't understand what you are driving at.
The lugging of the engine was the cause of the pinging, which is normal. You never want to lug an engine as you described in your opening post. As a double check, you may want to verify the timing mark on your damper. If the ring has spun or moved, your timing readings are off, and not really what you think they are.
That is what engines do. More advance, faster idle. See above.
RACE ON!!!
When I was "lugging" the engine, I was actually trying to get it to downshift. But it didn't on its own. I had to manually downshift it in order for there to be less load on the engine, plus I was trying to pass a slow moving semi.
Are you saying if there is too little timing, the engine will have part throttle drivability issues?
I am not trying to introduce new issues here. I was simply comparing my "low timing + stalling" problem to a MAF problem I had like 14 months ago.
You ask why? Because their effects are identical.
0 degree base timing + throttle = stall after start up
Bad MAF + throttle = stall after start up
I'm still just curious to know why the car stalls even at 0. So I also thought the ECM already adds timing to correct. It is like the engine "knows" the timing if it stalls from the low base timing. I sure would like to learn more...
I think the consideration you should have is the chip is programmed by Alvin(if I remember right) why would you be trying to put more timing at it anyway?
I'm sure he had it cranked up probably as far as what he would consider reasonable.
My pinging was the result of a two different things - exhaust problems and ignition patchwork, the root cause of which was the former owner I like to call Bubba.

Are you saying if there is too little timing, the engine will have part throttle drivability issues?
My truck runs that way when trying to get it out of overdrive. Getting on it harder will cause it to spit out the intake. Problem is, without a dyno, it's hard to measure total advance on a motor with vacuum advance, because you can't load up the motor.
I think the consideration you should have is the chip is programmed by Alvin(if I remember right) why would you be trying to put more timing at it anyway?
I'm sure he had it cranked up probably as far as what he would consider reasonable.
You ask why? Because their effects are identical.
0 degree base timing + throttle = stall after start up
Bad MAF + throttle = stall after start up
RACE ON!!!











