When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Once a month or so I remove the Air Intake and lubricate the butterflies with a shot of Silicone. While I have it off, is there really a benefit to removing the screen from the MAF?
This comes up every so often. From what I recall the general concensus is that it is not worth it. I recall someone a while ago had rented some dyno time and decided it was a goot time to do some testing and put the debate to rest. The result was that the differences in runs with and without the screens was so miniscule no benefit could be attributed to removing the screens.
I had removed the screens on my former '85 years ago. This time I decided not to. The screens protect the fragile wire from any debris that may get by the filter (unlikely but better than nothing) and some say the screen helps to even out the air as it passes through the MAF.
Debates still arise but after reading post after post on this issue I left my screens in on my current car.
When Chevy wanted to up the power from the '01 Z06 to the '02 Z06, they left the screens off the MAF, and decided that it did help.
So that was the only mod between an 01 and 02? Or did Cheby decide that they would save the cost of the screens and put in a cam that had 10* more duration???
yes, it will help an L98, but it isnt going to feel different, from a few small mods together you may feel something
on an LT1 it doesnt seem to help at all
To be clear - I am not looking for more HP - I'm looking for ways to improve fuel economy and/or efficiency of the motor. If making minor mods produces more HP, that is a bonus.
To be clear - I am not looking for more HP - I'm looking for ways to improve fuel economy and/or efficiency of the motor. If making minor mods produces more HP, that is a bonus.
I would just leave it. I noticed no difference...I would guess the LT1 might benefit from a little air "straightening" as it has some prety short runners, so airspeed would be a bit slower.....The TPIs are so long and the airpath so convoluted in the firstplace I cant see where it would make an appreciable difference.
When Chevy wanted to up the power from the '01 Z06 to the '02 Z06, they left the screens off the MAF, and decided that it did help.
Different style designed/calibrated MAFS...what worked for newer cars,didnt mean it worked for the older ones.MAF design has changed considerably since the 80s...I see your point though,but doesnt mean it applies to the 80's MAF style set up.
The best all around MAF sensor for power and economy is a stock unit.The stock L98 set up cannot inhale enough air to justify it outside the TB area anyways...the stock MAF and airbox can feed it all day long before and never be a restriction.
Alot of GM cars since the 90s dont have MAF screens,but are an entirely different set up.They wouldnt work on an L98 either without some serious mods and programming.
unless you have lots of mods and race your car on the track, this mod will do absolutely nothing for you. Don't waste your time. (I think you said in the past you weren't interested in racing, etc)... so yeah... don't bother.
Also, you would be supprised what can get past the air filter, especially on the older L98's, the intake housing just doesnt seal as well as it should after many years of use.
I removed my screens in my 85 and noticed a back fire in my exhaust when I would rev my motor until my car warmed up. I felt I got better miliage with the screens in and the car ran better I am looking for another maf with the screens in .
Yeah well I had been wondering about this topic too and had read opinions on it.
I have a mildly modded L98, flat-tops, stock heads, intake etc. but all ported, 211, K&N, cut lid, mail tune and so on and had been running a de-screened MAF since I built it, about 3000 miles ago.
Back then I got caught up in the hype of the so-called cheap h.p. mods...de-screening was one, as was a 52tb, relocating the AIT sensor...I know a little better now, esp. after taking heed from some clever dudes on this forum..
So, after reading this post I decided to try for myself and fitted a new screened MAF...any difference..?
None that I can tell...it still spins up like before and pulls just as strong, and is still fun to drive...!
After trying this out, I wouldn't bother taking out the screens again, and risking any dirt getting into the wires causing damage...
The ultimate test would be a b4 and after on a dyno, though..