When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I haven't had the pleasure of messing up...I mean messing with a C5 or a C6, but I'd guess that the Techies found they could provide the same air volume with a smaller surface area, freeing up precious space?
From: San Diego , CA Double Yellow DirtBags 1985..Z51..6-speed
Originally Posted by hippy
This would be some very good information to have. You can never have too much protection down to the minutest micron of plausible filtration.
My point is that you have to multiply the filter dimensions by the pleat count and pleat depth to figure out the ACTUAL area, otherwise the comparison is useless.
My point is that you have to multiply the filter dimensions by the pleat count and pleat depth to figure out the ACTUAL area, otherwise the comparison is useless.
RICE ON!!!
My point is you can, not you personally, over analyze anything to the point of it not meaning crap. Pull whatever filter you have on your car when you dyno and see how much you gain. My guess it will be somewhere around ZERO.
I missed the part where you measured the depth of the pleats and number of pleats per inch.
Did you look at the links I provided for each filter????
K&N doesn't give all the detailed information you need to do a really accuratecomparison.......BUT all the K&N filters are basically the same flat panel design, so I think it is pretty reasonable to use the overall dimensions as a relativebasis of comparison......
I think my conclusion that the C5 & C6 filters are approximately 30% smaller than the C4 filter is pretty reasonable.
OK let's play some math games, this also means the C4 filter is almost 50% larger than the C5/C6 filters!!!!!
..........I'd guess that the Techies found they could provide the same air volume with a smaller surface area, freeing up precious space?
If so the Techies were probably wrong regarding same volume of air......I don't follow C5 section closely, but I think there is general agreement that the aftermarket C5 air intake system provide significant and measureable performance gains.
In comparison there is general agreement that the aftermarket C4 systems provide minimal performance gains at best.
Another bit of information that doesn't seem to be readily available is the size and detail information on aftermarket systems. I know the filter area on the SLP triple snorkle is virtually identical to the stock system, because I have it and measured it carefully.....and I didn't see any measureable performance gains with the SLP system..
From: Everyday you must choose between the pain of discipline and the pain of regret. Fredericktown, OH
Originally Posted by LT4BUD
If so the Techies were probably wrong regarding same volume of air......I don't follow C5 section closely, but I think there is general agreement that the aftermarket C5 air intake system provide significant and measureable performance gains.
In comparison there is general agreement that the aftermarket C4 systems provide minimal performance gains at best.
Bud, having spent time in both sections, I agree with your assesment . . that there is general concensus and some objective data to show that the aftermarket kits do help C5s and not the C4s as much . . . at least on the dyno.
In comparison there is general agreement that the aftermarket C4 systems provide minimal performance gains at best.
[/QUOTE]
If you have the stock airbox even with the lid cut the main issue is getting enough air because the filter is too close to the base preventing airflow. In a stock to semi-stock configuration, it doesn't seem to make much difference but in a pretty heavily modded car, it makes a huge difference.
With a car making in the high 400 rwhp range I got tired of the POS breathless airbox always cracking, replacing the air passage and standing on my head to change out the filter so I went back to the stock system with a K+N filter and lost 20 hp on the dyno. Took another filter, cut out the guts and put the K+N back on top.........lost hp came back.
I've posted this trick before and amazed as to why more people don't pick up the real reason there not getting the most out of the stock airbox.
From: Olympia Washington 91 Z07 Coupe, 6spd, Borla Exhaust, Perf. Ignition, K&N Filter
that ruffled air pipe from the throttel body to the air cleaner assembly makes me cringe everytime i look at it, i wish there was a solid piece you could buy that replaced that thing, if there is could someone post the web adress for it, thanks
From: San Diego , CA Double Yellow DirtBags 1985..Z51..6-speed
Originally Posted by hippy
My point is you can, not you personally, over analyze anything to the point of it not meaning crap. Pull whatever filter you have on your car when you dyno and see how much you gain. My guess it will be somewhere around ZERO.
that ruffled air pipe from the throttel body to the air cleaner assembly makes me cringe everytime i look at it, i wish there was a solid piece you could buy that replaced that thing, if there is could someone post the web adress for it, thanks
Both Ecklers and MA sell a smooth tube but do not buy it. I did and after a few months the rubber split on the underside throwing a MAF code. Since the split was on the bottom I didn't see it until I went to remove the MAF to buy a new one. It doesn't stand up to the heat.