When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
the OP never said anything about the rest of his setup, so i assume stock. and i'm saying its WAY too much cam for an otherwise stock setup. and i'm also saying its a waste of time and money -- and will only serve to hurt his driving enjoyment -- if the cam is the only thing going on...........tune, or no tune.
and i don't get the "nowadays" line......we're talking about a GEN I smallblock, that aint nowadays. it was 1991, and the tech is older than that.
Yes it may be too aggressive for an otherwise stock setup. Can it work? Sure. Can it perform well? Yes again
As far as "nowadays", it may be a gen 1 motor, but cam technology has come along way since 1991. Along with tuning technology.
the OP never said anything about the rest of his setup, so i assume stock. and i'm saying its WAY too much cam for an otherwise stock setup. and i'm also saying its a waste of time and money -- and will only serve to hurt his driving enjoyment -- if the cam is the only thing going on...........tune, or no tune.
and i don't get the "nowadays" line......we're talking about a GEN I smallblock, that aint nowadays. it was 1991, and the tech is older than that.
It would be nice to know the "rest of the story" regarding what the mods are and unless I was reading too quickly, not even sure what engine it is. However. by todays standards, I'm in 100% agreement that the cam is virtually nothing.
It would be nice to know the "rest of the story" regarding what the mods are and unless I was reading too quickly, not even sure what engine it is. However. by todays standards, I'm in 100% agreement that the cam is virtually nothing.
That cam with a 114 LSA would hardly lope. "Nowadays" if its not .600 lift with 240 degrees of duration @ .050 with a 110 LSA, it aint a big cam!!! Yeah I know, thats LS1 stuff, but we run stuff comparable in LT1s and a little milder in SD cars.
BUT, In a TPI motor, with the stock intake, more aggressive cams will do nothing but sound good.
the OP never said anything about the rest of his setup, so i assume stock. and i'm saying its WAY too much cam for an otherwise stock setup. and i'm also saying its a waste of time and money -- and will only serve to hurt his driving enjoyment -- if the cam is the only thing going on...........tune, or no tune.
and i don't get the "nowadays" line......we're talking about a GEN I smallblock, that aint nowadays. it was 1991, and the tech is older than that.
This is the rest of it,
383 11.5 - 1 #30 Injectors Ajfpr, Y pipe with no precats, after markit muflers.
Is that the combo? Then heck no its not too much cam.
BUT you may have been better off with a different type grind. More lift, same duration, more lobe seperation, higher #, like a 114 LSA, advanced 2 or 3 deg. Something like that would make more power and idle better, require less tuning time.
Of course, that does depend on the flow capabilities of the heads. No sense in a .575 lift cam if the heads peter out at .550
This is the rest of it,
383 11.5 - 1 #30 Injectors Ajfpr, Y pipe with no precats, after markit muflers.
Any head work? Still have the OE TPI intake? These are the things that are gonna kill the HP....
Anyone tune it yet? Check with PCMforless. Alvin is the best around for mail order tunes for chip cars. We tune them but dont do the mail order stuff.
Last edited by edcmat-l1; Jan 5, 2007 at 06:59 PM.
Any head work? Still have the OE TPI intake? These are the things that are gonna kill the HP....
Anyone tune it yet? Check with PCMforless. Alvin is the best around for mail order tunes for chip cars. We tune them but dont do the mail order stuff.
totally agree, every word
i made an azzumption (stock setup), and made an azz out of me i apologize, ed, if i came on a bit strong.
Have we discerned whether or not the 'chip' has been re-tuned/programmed for this cammed 383?
The stock TPI Speed Density ECM is not going to like the cam's narrower 112 LSA, among other things. Any change in injector size can also cause problems.
This combo needs a 'chip' deleting the EGR, optimizing injector pulse, altering the timing curves, increasing the idle RPM, plus addressing a few other parameters based on valvetrain mods and intake/cam/head specs.
i made an azzumption (stock setup), and made an azz out of me i apologize, ed, if i came on a bit strong.
No Problemo. Dont need to apologize. A "big" cam is kinda an opinion. To alot of people if it lopes at all, its a big cam. I've seen (heard) cams with less than .525 lift chop their a$$ off. I've seen (heard) cams with almost .600 lift idle so smooth you could hardly tell it had a cam.
Been buildin motors along time (ASE Master Tech, 20 yrs exp). I can look at specs and tell you what it'll do in what car/motor. Aint braggin, just BTDT.
Have we discerned whether or not the 'chip' has been re-tuned/programmed for this cammed 383?
The stock TPI Speed Density ECM is not going to like the cam's narrower 112 LSA, among other things. Any change in injector size can also cause problems.
This combo needs a 'chip' deleting the EGR, optimizing injector pulse, altering the timing curves, increasing the idle RPM, plus addressing a few other parameters based on valvetrain mods and intake/cam/head specs.
No doubt. Thats why I said get in touch with Alvin. The combo of bigger cubes, bigger inj, AND an unfriendly cam (idle wise) and that thing is lucky to run at all in closed loop.
Thanks all for the input. Will sleep better tonight. Dyno tune with new chip burn may keep the cam in place and run out ok. Did not do my home work and paying for it. One says to do this then after the fact some one says you should have. My falt not asking all the right stuff up front and puting too much trust in any one. One said this one said that, when I get out the right info in the forum I get back some good stuff That I wish I looked for before I started this goat rope. Thanks again.
You seem to be knowledgeable. I would like a cam in my car that has a noticeable lope, yet is streetable with the stock converter. I will have the heads ported and polished to better flow at some point in time. What would you recommend. I have a 1996 LT-1 stock engine.
You seem to be knowledgeable. I would like a cam in my car that has a noticeable lope, yet is streetable with the stock converter. I will have the heads ported and polished to better flow at some point in time. What would you recommend. I have a 1996 LT-1 stock engine.
A noticeable lope and the stock converter are not gonna work well together. It might sound ok, but it will surge, lurch, not idle cleanly (in gear) because of the extra load against a tight converter. If you can, have your heads flowed. If you want lope, go with a converter.
A couple things to remember. 114 LSA and about 228 degrees @ .050 is about the point of lope. Something with that LSA and duration OR LESS would prob be OK with a stock converter.
the OP never said anything about the rest of his setup, so i assume stock. and i'm saying its WAY too much cam for an otherwise stock setup. and i'm also saying its a waste of time and money -- and will only serve to hurt his driving enjoyment -- if the cam is the only thing going on...........tune, or no tune.
and i don't get the "nowadays" line......we're talking about a GEN I smallblock, that aint nowadays. it was 1991, and the tech is older than that.
383 11.5 - 1 #30 Injectors Ajfpr Non precat Y pipe. Got to tune or pull the cam if it is going to run close to right.
No doubt. Thats why I said get in touch with Alvin. The combo of bigger cubes, bigger inj, AND an unfriendly cam (idle wise) and that thing is lucky to run at all in closed loop.
Hey Ed,
Nice to see you over here!
I appreciate all the kind words. Ed is a great guy and has a really nice shop we've visited quite a few times in VA beach.