When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hey guys I'm looking to supercharge my 88 A4 coupe, looking for decent boost with a stock L98. I have no plans of getting into the engine, just bolt on and go returning to stock if needed. True dual exhaust with h pipe, no cats, beefed rebuilt tranny and 2500 stall. Factory ecm. Needs to be steetable as it's my daily driver.
1. What would be a safe boost pressure?
2. What gains would be realized with that pressure?
1. You could run safely run 8-10 psi of boost on a stock bottom end...obviously 8 is going to be safer than 10, but I'm running 10 with no problems (other than a tired 135,000 mile engine).
2. That psi range will get you somewhere around 400-450+ chp, depending on tune.
3. I run 6* initial advance with the alky injection and a programmed 5* spark curve retard at WOT.
1. You could run safely run 8-10 psi of boost on a stock bottom end...obviously 8 is going to be safer than 10, but I'm running 10 with no problems (other than a tired 135,000 mile engine).
2. That psi range will get you somewhere around 400-450+ chp, depending on tune.
3. I run 6* initial advance with the alky injection and a programmed 5* spark curve retard at WOT.
Not trying to threadjack. I also have a L98, but mine is a '91 model. My car came with new exhaust(I think flowmaster), chip, 160* thermostat and K&N. I'm thinking that if I can get the extra money within a year, I would like to add a SC. What does everyone recommend for that model L98? It's an auto with 2.54 or something gears.
Not trying to threadjack. I also have a L98, but mine is a '91 model. My car came with new exhaust(I think flowmaster), chip, 160* thermostat and K&N. I'm thinking that if I can get the extra money within a year, I would like to add a SC. What does everyone recommend for that model L98? It's an auto with 2.54 or something gears.
Another approach you might want to consider is nitrous. The cost of a supercharger is high realtive to the value of your car (the C4 parts section has one listed for $3500). There is (was??) also a nitrous kit for sale there listed at $550. If /when I feel the need for speed, I'll probably go nitrous.
Another approach you might want to consider is nitrous. The cost of a supercharger is high realtive to the value of your car (the C4 parts section has one listed for $3500). There is (was??) also a nitrous kit for sale there listed at $550. If /when I feel the need for speed, I'll probably go nitrous.
It's like someone else here said though, the biggest problem with nitros (other than the damed stuff going BOOM!!) is...it runs out
That's why a lot of kits have a blow off tube, in case bottle temps get too high, it safely blows the one seal and vents the nitrous outside your car, am I wrong? I know I have a blow off tube.
even without a blow off tube it wouldn't matter, the valve would just release and let out the gas until it was at an atmospheric equilibrium.
I had an 89 Trans Am with a full nitrous setup, car went up in flames melting the rear bumper and whole entire car with a full tank of nitrous, when the bottle was pulled it weighed less and was black and grey, no explosion.
From what I have heard though the vette L98 got forged pistons as opposed to the f bodies, is that true at all?
even without a blow off tube it wouldn't matter, the valve would just release and let out the gas until it was at an atmospheric equilibrium.
I had an 89 Trans Am with a full nitrous setup, car went up in flames melting the rear bumper and whole entire car with a full tank of nitrous, when the bottle was pulled it weighed less and was black and grey, no explosion.
I am a proponent of SC and TC (I have also used N2O on many cars as well), but I can't just sit by and let some of the statements above fly. N2O in and of itself does not burn, it promotes combustion due to the additional oxygen that is added with additional fuel.
In the example just above, following the back half fire in the TA the N2O bottle was less than full, as the temps generated during the fire raised the bottle pressure and thus relieved the PSV (psi safety valve), preventing the actual bottle from exploding. So, in effect the PSV did exactly what it was intended to do.
So as is evidenced by the TA fire example above, do not blame N2O for something that it did not cause.
Aaron
Just to clarify, I dont know exactly who the post by AKS Racing was directed to but I was trying to say or at least let people infer exactly what AKS Racing stated, and the guy with a nitrous explosion in the back could not have been directly from the gas exploding in the bottle, unless it was some freak one in a million occurence.
anybody know if there was any piston differences for the vette L98?
My understanding is that '85 vettes had forged pistons, while the '86 and later L-98s did not.
My comments were directed at those who seem to think that N2O is going to cause the back half damage that some have posted on here. I used your TA fire as an example that supports the PSV function.
I love my small roots on my 69chevelle,never need a refill and is quiet. I floor the damn thing all over the place and it holds together if its done right. Same goes with nitrous though,done right it works great! My buddy and I go back and forth at the track with blower v.s. nitrous.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.