When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
ok im a newbie but tryin to learn. ive read vaders page and been researching other sites. my 90 is COMPLETLEY stock. i got some stuff in mind us tryin to map it out before i start. i know exhaust first so on and so on... workin on it!
heres my ?
can you jus put the miniram and fuel rails on and it work fine with out causeing problems? im sure a custom chip should be in there most def. cost of items and labor im guessing around 1700?
im sure this has been done numerous times and im probably gonna get alotta flack for this one but hey im a newbie throw me a freakn bone here! lol
thanx
It will "work", but it's not where I'd spend my first $1.5k. You'll probably end up losing a bit of the famous (infamous) TPI torque while your cam & exhaust will prevent you from picking up the high-end HP the miniram is capable of delivering.
Others may have different opinions, but I'd do the bolt-on mods in this order: exhaust, cam, intake, then heads. (OK, technically, a cam and heads aren't bolt-on, but I define anything where you don't have to pull the motor as bolt-on).
I recently got a torque converter and an exhaust system, and I can already tell the difference. My C4 sounds much better than it did stock, and has a lot more "get up and go". I'd definitely go exhaust-converter first... after that, I think I'll probably get a mild increase in rear gear ratio, then maybe the cam/rockers/heads/intake route.
yeah it probably would be wisher to go with some cheaper bolt on mods first huh. you know how it is tho. you want it all and right now. lol
tranzor sounds like youre tryin to mod yours for low end. thats my plans also.
what brand toeque con did you use? what exhaust did you go with?
Definately start with exhaust work on the L98 cars. The exhaust strangles the motor already, adding the MiniRam (even higher RPM capability)will only make the exhaust problem worse.
To prevent the "throttle tip in" issues", you need to run more base timing. I run 12 degrees and fill'er up with premium gas so it does just fine with no pinging issues. Also more base timing gives you back some torque you lost when you still had the TPI in.
To prevent the "throttle tip in" issues", you need to run more base timing. I run 12 degrees and fill'er up with premium gas so it does just fine with no pinging issues. Also more base timing gives you back some torque you lost when you still had the TPI in.
Perhaps, but the correct way to resolve the issue would be as vader86 advised; have the chip re-programmed (acceleration enrichment would need to be increased).
To prevent the "throttle tip in" issues", you need to run more base timing. I run 12 degrees and fill'er up with premium gas so it does just fine with no pinging issues. Also more base timing gives you back some torque you lost when you still had the TPI in.
Doing this is going to change timing globally, which at other rpm ranges and KPA, may or may not be needed. Adjusting the entire tune (lower and upper VE in conjunction w/timing, PE etc.) for his MAP car would be a better approach.....IMO
Perhaps, but the correct way to resolve the issue would be as vader86 advised; have the chip re-programmed (acceleration enrichment would need to be increased).
All you'd need to do is fatten the injector pulse width a little bit, especially on the lower rpms. I did this globally on my chip. A/F ratio on med. throttle - WOT runs just fine EXACTLY at 12.8:1 when last dynoed. Now that's pretty close! My car felt like it was misfiring on top when the target A/F ratio was set at 13:1. I'm gonna see how the car does when richer up top, like 12.5:1 for PE.
There is roughly half a second difference at the drag strip from running stock 6 to 12 degrees of timing. Yeah, the car definitely feels laggy and underpowered when runs were made with 6 degrees. It will sometimes backfire from the intake at times when cold. I ran a 14.07 @ 98.91 mph with stock timing, from most of my consistent 13.6x @ 104.xx mph runs. So the answer is yes it does; most of it.
There is roughly half a second difference at the drag strip from running stock 6 to 12 degrees of timing. Yeah, the car definitely feels laggy and underpowered when runs were made with 6 degrees. It will sometimes backfire from the intake at times when cold. I ran a 14.07 @ 98.91 mph with stock timing, from most of my consistent 13.6x @ 104.xx mph runs. So the answer is yes it does; most of it.
To me, this would indicate that there is a problem somewhere else, either mechanical or in the tune, and that the advanced timing is only serving to mask it.
Some cars like you to advance the timing, some don't. I know mine doesn't.
There had to be other factors helping you get 1/2 a second with only timing being changed.
13.6@104 on a stock L98 is not normal. In 3 years of being on this forum I have never heard of anyone else getting these numbers.
With all my bolt ons and perfect conditions at the track I got 13.55@101.
Maybe I missunderstood you and the car wasn't stock.