C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

G.M. Crate engine?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 5, 2007 | 11:59 AM
  #1  
Simmons-Racing's Avatar
Simmons-Racing
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Macungie PA
Default G.M. Crate engine?

I just bought a 1990 and it has a Crate Engine part #12486041, the dealer told me it is the 330h.p. engine. It has allum. heads and I thought the 330h.p. came with cast heads ? How could I tell what heads it has on it?

Thanks,

Eric
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2007 | 12:07 PM
  #2  
Carl Johansson's Avatar
Carl Johansson
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Simmons-Racing
I just bought a 1990 and it has a Crate Engine part #12486041, the dealer told me it is the 330h.p. engine. It has allum. heads and I thought the 330h.p. came with cast heads ? How could I tell what heads it has on it?

Thanks,

Eric
Put a magnet on it? 335 hp is what is advertised for the ZZ4 motor - it has aluminum heads!
Carl Johansson
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2007 | 04:01 PM
  #3  
Slalom4me's Avatar
Slalom4me
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,036
Likes: 13
From: Edmonton AB
Default

Originally Posted by Simmons-Racing
I just bought a 1990 and it has a Crate Engine part #12486041, the dealer told me it is the 330h.p. engine. It has allum. heads and I thought the 330h.p. came with cast heads ? How could I tell what heads it has on it?
The #12486041 is the 330HP engine and it has iron Vortec heads
- you will know at a glance whether your heads are the Vortecs if
there are only four vertical fasteners instead of six inclined ones
per side. Like Carl Johansson says, also use a magnet to check the
head material - unless there has been a change, you are right about
the 330HP shipping with iron heads.

From GM Parts Direct
DESCRIPTION: ENG-330HP HO BASE
Our lowest priced crate engine, the 330 horsepower 350 HO doesn't sacrifice power or durability, it just pumps up the value. With its four bolt main block, nodular iron crankshaft, powerded metal steel connecting rods and light but strong cast aluminum pistons, this engine screams durability. Add to the strong foundation a pair of 64cc Vortec cast iron cylinder heads and a dual pattern camshaft with just a bit of a "lumpy" idle, and you've got the muscle car small block that you've been looking for. Dressed to impress with chrome valve covers and timing cover, this engine will look great between the fenders of your favorite street rod, muscle car or grass roots racer. The cylinder heads on this great little performer use 1.94" intake and 1.50" exhaust valves that are sprung with 5.7 Liter L31 valve springs. The 64cc chambers yield a healthy, but streetable 9.1 to 1 compression ratio. The cam is a modern dual pattern interpretation of the old '65 to '67 Corvette 327 cam. But with more lift and duration on the exhaust side, it does a better job of clearing exhaust from the combustion chamber. We also decreased duration and lift ever so slightly on the intake side to build more cylinder pressure. The result is a cam that makes great torque and horsepower with the 350 HO's compression ratio. Add the new dual plane intake manifold P/N 12496820, 650 cfm carburetor, HEI distributor, torsional damper, water pump and exhaust manifolds or headers and you've got an outstanding muscle motor with a broad, smooth torque curve and an honest 330 horsepower. This manifold has four bolts, not six, to attach it to the cylinder head. Older six-bolt manifolds will not fit the new Vortec heads. The 350 HO is not intended for marine use, and should only be used in 1975 and earlier pre-emissions street vehicles or any year off road vehicles.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2007 | 04:24 PM
  #4  
Slalom4me's Avatar
Slalom4me
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,036
Likes: 13
From: Edmonton AB
Default

If it turns out that the heads have six bolts, are aluminum and have
center-bolt valve covers - it is possible that the original heads have
been swapped onto the engine.

Original aluminum heads for a '90 have the casting number #10088113
under the valve covers. The OEM characteristics are: angled plugs,
58cc chambers, 1.94"/1.5" valves and raised "D-shaped" exhaust ports.

What intake system is on the car - the OEM Tuned Port Injection?

.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2007 | 05:21 PM
  #5  
Simmons-Racing's Avatar
Simmons-Racing
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Macungie PA
Default

Originally Posted by Slalom4me
If it turns out that the heads have six bolts, are aluminum and have
center-bolt valve covers - it is possible that the original heads have
been swapped onto the engine.

Original aluminum heads for a '90 have the casting number #10088113
under the valve covers. The OEM characteristics are: angled plugs,
58cc chambers, 1.94"/1.5" valves and raised "D-shaped" exhaust ports.

What intake system is on the car - the OEM Tuned Port Injection?

.
I just looked at the number on the head and it is 10088113. I have the stock TPI .
Are these heads better or worse then the ones that came with the 330hp motor?
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2007 | 05:37 PM
  #6  
vader86's Avatar
vader86
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 62,097
Likes: 1,724
From: Athens AL
C7 of the Year - Unmodified Finalist 2021
C4 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
Default

I personally would rather have the '113s than the Vortec, but theyre pretty close to each other.

The engine doesnt make the 330hp its rated at anyway with the stock TPI intake on it, independent of head choice the TPI chokes it.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2007 | 05:44 PM
  #7  
Simmons-Racing's Avatar
Simmons-Racing
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Macungie PA
Default

Originally Posted by vader86
I personally would rather have the '113s than the Vortec, but theyre pretty close to each other.

The engine doesnt make the 330hp its rated at anyway with the stock TPI intake on it, independent of head choice the TPI chokes it.
What would you recomend for the intake ? What else would you recomend to make more power with this engine/head setup ?
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2007 | 06:26 PM
  #8  
VetNutJim's Avatar
VetNutJim
Safety Car
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 5
From: Atlantis
Cruise-In I Veteran
Default

The '113' heads were stock for 90 and 91.

Were they also used in '89???? I thought the '128' heads were 87~89.

With those heads on your engine, you're right back to 250 HP like your Vette had when it was new if it has '113' heads and flat top pistons.
They aren't giving any camshaft specs but that could affect the power output.

The description sez it has Vortec heads.

Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

2027 Corvette Buyer's Guide: Everything You Need to Know!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

10 Things C8 Corvette Owners Hate (But Won't Tell You)

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Best Corvettes Coming to Barrett-Jackson Palm Beach 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-9

Every Corvette Grand Sport Explained! (C2, C4, C6, C7, & C8)

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 5, 2007 | 06:36 PM
  #9  
Slalom4me's Avatar
Slalom4me
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,036
Likes: 13
From: Edmonton AB
Default

I disagree about stock 113 heads flowing similar to Vortecs. Out of
the box, the Vortec flows considerably higher values across the lift spectrum.
(But it doesn't matter really given what your car has.)

0.200". - 0.300". - 0.400". - 0.500".

120/096. 160/123 . 186/140 . 196/155. - 163cc (L98 TPI w/58cc & 1.94/1.50) Also known as D-port 113's
139/105. 190/137 . 227/151 . 239/160. - 170cc (885 Iron Vortec w/ 64cc & 1.94/1.50)

On the 330HP crate motor, one difference is that the 58cc 113's will
produce higher compression than the 64cc Vortecs.

Originally Posted by Simmons-Racing
What would you recomend for the intake ? What else would you
recommend to make more power with this engine/head setup ?
You really need to say more about the rest of the car and what the
intended application is.

If you were prepared to use a hood bulge of some sort, the Holley
Stealth Ram has worked well - it just does not fit under the hood.

Some other choices are the Mini Ram (high RPM, no EGR), Super Ram
(good all round performer, greater installation difficulty and currently
out of production), a single plane intake that has been converted to
EFI, or a traditional carb & intake that replaces the current EFI.

There has been extensive discussion about each here.

Are you sure the bottom end is from the 330HP package?

.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2007 | 07:13 PM
  #10  
Simmons-Racing's Avatar
Simmons-Racing
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Macungie PA
Default

I would like to build the car to run 1/4 mile and Auto-X sometimes. I plan on getting LT headers and exhaust. I have a Tag on my block with the part # and build date of the engine and it is the 330hp part number.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2007 | 09:57 PM
  #11  
VetNutJim's Avatar
VetNutJim
Safety Car
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 5
From: Atlantis
Cruise-In I Veteran
Default

If I had the intake to support them I'd lot rather have the Vortec heads. A lot more combustion chamber swirl makes the cylinder charge burn better for making more power. The combustion chamber shape is better than the 113 heads too.

What was the design goal of that 'block' in the chamber between the intake and exhaust side on the 128 and 113 heads???
I'm don't think I understand that at all.

A Vortec head engine with TPI on it, now that DOES sound interesting.
Anybody want to take a guess at what the CHP is on it?
310? 325?

What intake?
That's basically determined by where you want to make power and as stated, what you want to do with the car.
Higher RPM or lower RPM?
That's also going to determine the camshaft specs (and the gear ratio).

In a nutshell:

High RPM _____________
1) Mini Ram
2) Converted LT1 ... about the same as above
3) StealthRam won't fit under the stock hood
Camshaft: Intake & Exhaust duration 220*~235* @ .050


Low RPM__________
1) Stock TPI RPM or more accurately Intake Limited
2) Modified TPI Larger Base & RUnners Still Intake Limited
3) SuperRam
Camshaft: Intake & Exhaust duration 205*~225* @ .050
205 is close to stock, not too good.

None of that is 'written in stone', it's just a general guidline.

You'll want (need?) an EPROM to make most any of the combinations run 'just right'.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2007 | 11:25 PM
  #12  
vader86's Avatar
vader86
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 62,097
Likes: 1,724
From: Athens AL
C7 of the Year - Unmodified Finalist 2021
C4 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
Default

Originally Posted by Simmons-Racing
What would you recomend for the intake ? What else would you recomend to make more power with this engine/head setup ?
I'm aware that Vortec can flow more than '113, which was stock from 88-91, but I dont like the tradeoff in weight and compression ratio. I'm aware that you can alter other things to compensate, I just dont like to. I highly doubt the engine would make much more with the Vortec head than with the '113 that is on it, considering that the TPI is on there.

I would recommend you read my website and decide where you want to end up with the car, before you start looking for intakes. The cam you have in there may also affect your decision, and whether or not you ever wish to change that.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 08:45 AM
  #13  
opel's Avatar
opel
Burning Brakes
25 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 91
From: Pittsburgh,PA
Default

Originally Posted by VetNutJim
A Vortec head engine with TPI on it, now that DOES sound interesting.
Anybody want to take a guess at what the CHP is on it?
310? 325?
All ready did that it was on my 85 so I was not going from 113 heads but from the stock iron 85 heads. I did before and after dyno runs, only gained something like 12 HP but something like 50 fp torque.
As soon as I finish with the clutch and headers on the new 388 engine I will be getting it dynoed as well. I'm running modified Vortec heads and the superram on it.
Dave

Last edited by opel; Mar 7, 2007 at 08:52 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 11:16 AM
  #14  
CentralCoaster's Avatar
CentralCoaster
Team Owner
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 24,337
Likes: 25
From: San Diego , CA Double Yellow DirtBags 1985..Z51..6-speed
Default

Keep in mind running the Vortec heads will require a new $400 TPI baseplate, or machining new holes in the heads.

Makes me wonder how hard it would be to just put the Vortec holes into a stock intake.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 11:23 AM
  #15  
Simmons-Racing's Avatar
Simmons-Racing
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Macungie PA
Default

What do you think the compression ratio is with the 113 heads on the crate engine ?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 01:04 PM
  #16  
mike43725's Avatar
mike43725
Advanced
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 77
Likes: 1
From: zanesville ohio
Default

imo the vortec heads are better than 113 heads, but some people don't like the extra weight, as far as power you can get 330 hp with a modified tpi on the gm 330 hp crate motor. I think a lot of people start getting crazy about the weight issue of iron heads, when in reality unless you plan to have a serious race car it doesn't really matter, and if you want some real heads that are aluminum go with brodix, but 330 hp is plenty for the street.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 01:07 PM
  #17  
mike43725's Avatar
mike43725
Advanced
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 77
Likes: 1
From: zanesville ohio
Default

sorry, didn't see that you have 113 heads already, i would use them they will work fine for what you want to do.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To G.M. Crate engine?

Old Mar 7, 2007 | 01:40 PM
  #18  
Slalom4me's Avatar
Slalom4me
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,036
Likes: 13
From: Edmonton AB
Default

Originally Posted by CentralCoaster
Makes me wonder how hard it would be to just put the Vortec holes
into a stock intake.
This is probably relative to one's time, desire & ability.

While it would be easier than your project of changing transmissions,
my vote favours buying a Vortec intake rather than converting a 23º intake.



.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 02:01 PM
  #19  
Slalom4me's Avatar
Slalom4me
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,036
Likes: 13
From: Edmonton AB
Default

Originally Posted by Simmons-Racing
What do you think the compression ratio is with the 113 heads on the crate engine ?
Holding other variables constant, reducing chamber size from
64cc to 58cc seems to increase compression from 9.0:1 to about 9.6:1.

I am using the following entries to arrive at the 9.0:1 CR published
for the 330HP engine w/ Vortec heads.

- the Vortecs have 64cc chambers,
- the bore x stroke is 4.00" x 3.48"
- the gasket bore is 4.03"
- the gasket is about 0.041" compressed
- the deck clearance is about 0.020"
- the piston dish volume is 13cc (ie: -13)

Then, when chamber size is reduced to 58cc to represent the
#113 heads, compression is reported as 9.563:1

While the component volumes may vary from what is actually
present, my vote is that for estimating the effect of a change
in chamber volume on compression ratio, these will suffice.

Here is a thread with values for the L98 that may be informative.

Basic piston head measurements 91 L98

Another thought worth mentioning is the rule-of-thumb about
aluminum heads being able to tolerate approximately 1 more point
of compression, compared to iron heads - all else being equal.

.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 03:22 PM
  #20  
BADDUCK's Avatar
BADDUCK
Le Mans Master
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,642
Likes: 5
From: One day you're a Comet...the next day you're dust... Arkansas
Default

That's the same as stock compression in 1989 (9.5:1). I believe in 1990 stock compression was 10.25:1.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:14 AM.

story-0
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-2
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE
story-5
5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

Slideshow: 5 most and least popular Corvette model years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-08 13:25:01


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Corvette Buyer's Guide: Everything You Need to Know!

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette buyer's guide

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-17 16:41:08


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Things C8 Corvette Owners Hate (But Won't Tell You)

Slideshow: 10 things C8 Corvette owners hate, but won't tell you.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-01 18:36:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Best Corvettes Coming to Barrett-Jackson Palm Beach 2026!

Slideshow: Should you add one of these incredible Corvettes to your garage?

By Brett Foote | 2026-04-01 18:14:05


VIEW MORE
story-9
Every Corvette Grand Sport Explained! (C2, C4, C6, C7, & C8)

Slideshow: Every Corvette Grand Sport explained

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-03-26 07:13:44


VIEW MORE