When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The LT1/4 block is going to require clearancing; no way around that. Not difficult or very time consuming to do either.
'H' beams rods are your best choice for not having camshaft clearance problems.
I just built a 388 and the parts I used are in my signature. If you decide to go that route, stay in touch and I may be able to walk you through some of the things I had to address in building mine.
From: Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die
St. Jude Donor '04-'05-'06-'07
Originally Posted by billybonesmusic
nice.........mine is old, '84 thats why i decided to go with a 400 cid
(406)
No reason not to in that case, if you can find one, that is. If someone ever makes a larger bore (and hopefully) aluminum LT1 block, I'll be the first in line. Like Jake, I built a 388 but did it with a 3.80" stroke at +.030" being the main difference. I used Eagle ESP featherweight 6" H-beam rods and SRP lightweight pistons. The light rods and pistons also enabled my machinist to trim 3 lbs. off of my 4340 Eagle neutral balance crank. Also I used a smaller diameter, aluminum ATI Super Damper.
Less weight = less wasted HP and more efficiency. That's where it's at if you can afford it, man. Spend once, but save from there on.
No reason not to in that case, if you can find one, that is. If someone ever makes a larger bore (and hopefully) aluminum LT1 block, I'll be the first in line. Like Jake, I built a 388 but did it with a 3.80" stroke at +.030" being the main difference. I used Eagle ESP featherweight 6" H-beam rods and SRP lightweight pistons. The light rods and pistons also enabled my machinist to trim 3 lbs. off of my 4340 Eagle neutral balance crank. Also I used a smaller diameter, aluminum ATI Super Damper.
Less weight = less wasted HP and more efficiency. That's where it's at if you can afford it, man. Spend once, but save from there on.
Sounds good Kid. I want quality stuff. I understand the value of keeping the rotating parts light.
I have been wrenching as a hobby all of my life but I haven't built alot of engines. I think the LT-1/LT4 is an internally balanced engined. Can someone explain the difference. Clearancing the block is pretty straightforward. I want to avoid cam clearance issues.
Never worked on a LT4, but I know the LT1 is a hybrid, like the L98. It has, from the factory, a neutral balanced damper, but the flexplate is weighted.
A new recip assembly can be bought completely internally balanced, calling for neutral damper and flexplate, which is the route I took.
Also, as the stock assembly can be converted to be completely internally balanced by the addition of Mallory metal to the crank.
From all I've read and from my recent personal experience, 'H' rods, like the EAGLE's I'm running, will not cause cam clearance problems. 'I' beams are another story though.
I think the LT-1/LT4 is an internally balanced engined. Can someone explain the difference. Clearancing the block is pretty straightforward. I want to avoid cam clearance issues.
The LTx engines are internal/external balanced. This THREAD will get you started. Let me know if you need more.
The stock 5.7" rods will clear the camshaft with a little light grinding on the bolt heads.
The LTx engines are internal/external balanced. This THREAD will get you started. Let me know if you need more.
The stock 5.7" rods will clear the camshaft with a little light grinding on the bolt heads.
RACE ON!!!
Read the thread. Thanks. The LT4 doesn't have a flexplate so that balancing method does not apply. Does that mean that a stock LT4 crank is internally balanced or does the harmonic dampner pick up the slack?
From: Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die
St. Jude Donor '04-'05-'06-'07
Originally Posted by lefoy84
Read the thread. Thanks. The LT4 doesn't have a flexplate so that balancing method does not apply. Does that mean that a stock LT4 crank is internally balanced or does the harmonic dampner pick up the slack?
No, on manual cars an externally balanced flywheel is used. You can choose an aftermarket crank in either configuration though. The internally balanced both front and rear cranks usually just cost a little more, that's all. And of course you'll have to have your flywheel neutrally balanced or get one that is, if you go that route.
I used an Eagle Street Strip kit in a 1990ish roller block. No clearence issues, Didn't even need a stroker pan but I already had one anyway.
You can get the kits internal or external balance, one or two piece rear seal. Can also be had forged. Forged $1800 Cast $900
I used an Eagle Street Strip kit in a 1990ish roller block. No clearence issues, Didn't even need a stroker pan but I already had one anyway.
You can get the kits internal or external balance, one or two piece rear seal. Can also be had forged. Forged $1800 Cast $900
Read the thread. Thanks. The LT4 doesn't have a flexplate so that balancing method does not apply. Does that mean that a stock LT4 crank is internally balanced or does the harmonic dampner pick up the slack?
My bad. That's what I get for ***-U-MEing. In an effort to save what I thought would be unnecessary and redundant typing, I neglected to spell out the details of flex plates for automatic transmission cars and flywheels for stick shift cars. Silly me! I made the stupid mistake of giving you and other readers credit for knowing that since the flywheel and flex plate occupy the same location in their respective applications, that reference to one would be sufficient for a person to know that what applies to the one would apply to the other in it's own application. Stupid me! Never again!
No, it does not mean that "a stock LT4 crank is internally balanced". Additionally, it is not possible for a damper at the front of the engine to be weighted to compensate for a weight problem at the rear of the engine.
Given the above, you might be better advised to skip shopping for stroker kits and concentrate on long blocks and installers.
My bad. That's what I get for ***-U-MEing. In an effort to save what I thought would be unnecessary and redundant typing, I neglected to spell out the details of flex plates for automatic transmission cars and flywheels for stick shift cars. Silly me! I made the stupid mistake of giving you and other readers credit for knowing that since the flywheel and flex plate occupy the same location in their respective applications, that reference to one would be sufficient for a person to know that what applies to the one would apply to the other in it's own application. Stupid me! Never again!
No, it does not mean that "a stock LT4 crank is internally balanced". Additionally, it is not possible for a damper at the front of the engine to be weighted to compensate for a weight problem at the rear of the engine.
Given the above, you might be better advised to skip shopping for stroker kits and concentrate on long blocks and installers.
No. Just ready to go on it. I have to remember that this is a very diverse audience. What is second nature to many, is news to others. And that common sense isn't as common as it's name would lead one to believe. Obviously, I failed in communicating with YOU.