allbowties

I am looking to replace the shifter in my 92. Any recommendations?

'Shifter

CSS996

I have a Hurst, but it is not installed yet. I've heard good things. But I had quite a run around trying to get one with the bearings included. If you do a search for something like "Hurst Shifter Missing Bearings" you may find a nice long post about it...

B&M bought Hurst, and it sounds like Hurst left a mess to clean up...

96 lt-4

i have driven both.the b&m has shorter throws and is a bit notchier.i think it is better suited to a weekend warrior or race car.i have a hurst in my car and it is smooth and precise.i don't know what the stock shifter feels like,mine was already installed when i bought the car.

vetteblack

Here we go again. B&M

CentralCoaster

Hurst - shorter buttery shift, easy like factory
B&M - even shorter, notchier shift, more effort, more precise.


I have a Hurst in my 85.

Strick

My Hurst shifter had everything included and works great. Looks good and feels better.

JEFNLSA

x2

STL94LT1

Hurst gets my vote!!

Aardwolf

Is the shifter suppose to give some kind of performance shifting gain or is it just for feel/looks?

Hardbar sells a Delrin ***:

http://hardbarusa.com/hardbar/produc...b362f48877e44c

DVNCI

A ****, no. But the Hurst/B&M kits replace the whole shifter mechanism.

I don't have experience with the Hurst but the I LOVE my B&M. It has a very mechanical feel and a very short throw.

Aardwolf

Is it a preference in feel or does it help you shift faster? I have not used a manual shift in a long long time (back injury).

Digital Disaster

Deja vu....

Hurst for me

DVNCI

You can definitely shift a little faster. I doubt you could tell in the 1/4 mile though, at least not noticeably.

Mostly it's a feel thing.

The ZF feels awesome with a B&M.

Z07coupe

ZF Doc Shifter

C4DC

Hurst here