When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Q2: Are there good flat tappet cams for a superram combo, or do I need to retro fit a roller?
Please do not get into a debate over which brand heads to use. I want to know the advantages/disavantages of a 180cc v/s 195cc with a superram...ei: will the 195's move my peak hp 300 rpms higher or does it make a difference? These are the answers I'm looking for. I would love to see some hp numbers from the superram guys, with what size heads they are runing along with what rpm.
Q1: What are the advantages/disadvantages of a 180cc head vs a 195cc head. Assuming current setup plus cam to match heads and superram.
Assuming this engine is staying as a 350 for the forseeable future, the 180 will be a slightly better matched combination. A 195cc would, in general, lose a little on the low-end to a 180, given a cam like stock or one best fit to SR. 195 would let it breathe better at top end, so yes it could move the power peaks up a few hundred RPM. I would recommend that if you were going 383 at some point.
Q2: Are there good flat tappet cams for a superram combo, or do I need to retro fit a roller?
There are some you can use, like the 74213, which is supposed to be an equivalent to the 74219 that everyone uses with SR. (224/234 @050", .465/.488, 112 LSA) At any rate, you will want something with a duration spec'd around 220/220. You could convert to roller and use the 219 as well.
underPar, I have 180 iron eagles (cast iron) my 355 with a super ram and I have a LT1 conversion intake that I tried first and for a cam I tried a Crane 841 which is a GM 847 (Crane grinds some of GM cams) and I tried a GM Hot Cam. The heads were purchase bare a cleanup, they flow 250cfm @.500 int and 190cfm exh. The problem I had was the exhaust. You need a gooooood exhaust. The car ran the best with the SR and 847 but I didn't have a good exhaust on the car then, now It has the hot cam with 1.5RR and 3" true dual and X pipe and it run the same as it did with the bigger cam. But I know that the 847 will really work now since I change the exhaust and I have a 9.5" 3000 stall that is ready to go in as soon as I recover for surgery in two months
Randy
Q2: Are there good flat tappet cams for a superram combo, or do I need to retro fit a roller?
Please do not get into a debate over which brand heads to use. I want to know the advantages/disavantages of a 180cc v/s 195cc with a superram...ei: will the 195's move my peak hp 300 rpms higher or does it make a difference? These are the answers I'm looking for. I would love to see some hp numbers from the superram guys, with what size heads they are runing along with what rpm.
My vote is 195s with a short duration (220-230 degree @ .050) camshaft. They will support a 350/355 to 6000/6200rpm.
rlane5 - What numbers are you putting down and at what rpms? It looks like you have a similar setup to what I am planning on building.
Right now I have the worst heads put on a c4. I know either head will be a major improvement.
vader86 - I have read over your site, and have spent hours searching. Do you know of any dyno graphs that I could compare 180cc heads v/s 195 cc heads either on a worked tpi or superram?
I have seen a couple tests but one was on a 400in sbc and the other was with a mini ram, so naturally the 195 was a better fit in those cases. I would just like to find out how much I low end torque I would give up and how much hp I would gain by going with the 195s. Right now the car makes 245hp/338tq at the rears.
vader86 - I have read over your site, and have spent hours searching. Do you know of any dyno graphs that I could compare 180cc heads v/s 195 cc heads either on a worked tpi or superram?
I have seen a couple tests but one was on a 400in sbc and the other was with a mini ram, so naturally the 195 was a better fit in those cases. I would just like to find out how much I low end torque I would give up and how much hp I would gain by going with the 195s. Right now the car makes 245hp/338tq at the rears.
I dont know where any are, but I do recall seeing a few. I think that was on 3rdgen. I dont remember all the details of the motor, but recall thinking that there wasnt going to be a big difference for most streetable combos. Your rwtq number isnt going to be much different, the peak will just be a little north of where it'd be with 180s, shouldnt matter with newer port designs. Because of that, I dont think they'll give anything up until around 6000, and should be more responsive. If you want to run it higher than that, and are building the motor to do it right, then 195s.
From: One day you're a Comet...the next day you're dust... Arkansas
Originally Posted by jsup
I disagree. In other words...WRONG!
The SR is designed to be a mid RPM performer, which the smaller heads are better suited.
John, I am beginning to believe you don't know near as much as you think you do. You have been wrong many times on your own car. I stand by my recommendation, it depends on what he wants to accomplish as I said.
With the super ram the bigger cam did make more power, and it wasn't tune (chip) properly and I did not have a good exhaust on it. I was using a Gen 6 DFI which I was clueless dial it in, and it a Speed Desity which harder to dial in whith a large duration cam. I try different setups a on to the track,
Randy
From: Bergen County, NJ Democrats, doing for the country what they did for Michigan
Originally Posted by BADDUCK
John, I am beginning to believe you don't know near as much as you think you do. You have been wrong many times on your own car. I stand by my recommendation, it depends on what he wants to accomplish as I said.
I just givin' you crap, hence the
I don't think we disagree. I struggled with the 195/180 debate when I picked my heads. I was looking at the Patriot 195s. Since I went with Brodix, who does not have a 195, the choice was 200 or 180.
Patriot guys recommended the 195. Brodix guys recommended the 180. Engine builder who I purchased the heads through, was on the fence.
I went with 180s becuase I felt the SR was more setup for 5500 RPMs and down, plus, that's typically where I drive. I believe that is consistent with your position.
If you think your headed for a 383 or larger down the road consider the 195cc heads. For hyd flat tappet cams look at the Lunati Voodoo cams #60102LK or the #60103LK or Comp hyd roller lobe #3192 ground on a 111 w/ 4 degrees of advance. Consider a reduced base circle cam now if your thinking stroker down the road. Might want to have the superram professionally ported while its off.
From: Bergen County, NJ Democrats, doing for the country what they did for Michigan
Originally Posted by 88BlackZ-51
Take a long look at the AFR lineup. Best bang for your buck never hurts!
BTW, What's your handicap?
You never fail.
It's the best bang for the buck if a hypothetical 40 HP pull a number out of your *** estimate BEST CASE is worth $700.
If you think that a POSSIBLE NO GAURANTEE 40HP, probably closer to 20 (as long as we're pulling numbers out of our asses) is worth the extra coin, then all means.
There's also Edlebrock, Patriot, Brodix, TFS, and others that make perfectly acceptable products.
AFR and Pro Action have always been the best bang for your buck, at least on the flow bench. No other 180cc head flows 260+ cfm @.500 lift out of the box besides those two. at least none i know of. what i would like to see is a 180 and 200cc head that flow almost the same cfm numbers. like a really good 180 and a pretty good 200. see what happens on the dyno. you would think the 180 would win with port velocity but at what point does the 180 stall that same velocity? reason says it will be lower than a 200.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.