Valvetrain for 7500 rpm?
Noland
I have Jesel and T&D on two different motors. Both are quality pieces, both are on big SBCs, both are solid rollers with 700+ open seat psi and neither spin past 6600RPM. I am not sure I would want traditional stud mounted rockers in these applications.
Aaron
w/AKS. Youre going to need some heavy duty parts, best springs you can get your hands on. Got the Jesel SS 1.6 here. THey are heavier than an aluminum rocker but you can bet your but they arent going to break and are rebuildable. Stability like a ****Its a few hundred more than a real good rocker and can prevent thousands in damage....
However, Crane has some shaft rockers for ~ $800.
What do you think of those?
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...1&autoview=sku
Jesel SS series roughly $800
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
unless you bought them through someones resale#
http://www.jeselonline.com/v2/index.php?categoryid=14
Last edited by cv67; Jul 25, 2008 at 01:47 PM.
I did some research, and there are a lot of gen I sbc's built for high rpm's but I didn't see any block-related problems reported.
If you have some more input on that, write on, I still haven't started to work on this engine, so maybe there is something I can improve.
I do intend to short fill the block, to strengthen it!
^^ Pretty much the reason I'm so infatuated with the lucky number 7.
The ZR-1s and the LS7 don't do much to deter my thinking. IF I were in the market for a new power plant, I could be happy with something 6500 rpm. 7K is lofty but who on here doesn't love hearing an Chevy v8 going that high? We just don't have the money to make a similar setup.
And it's not just the engine, everything else on the car has to be upgraded to keep up. I've seen a few pictures from CF posters of their halfshafts twisted apart.
Sliding, if you do go through with your engine build, post pictures!
Why?
I want to get max. power out of it, and is there any other way than with high revs?
Sure, with more cubes, but I've allready decided to go with 383. That looked like best compromise to me. I could've gone 396 way, but then I would want to rev that past 7000, and that would be even more difficult.
355 would also be interesting, but since I needed a new crank, I decided for a little bit longer stroke.
377 is my favorite combo, but I couldn't afford aftermarket 400 block, and going so radical with revs in stock GM casting that is prone to overheat and have a lot of casting issues would be too risky.
BTW, I found one very interesting combo in car craft magazine.
Wild-570HP 383
Lunati 4340 crank
Lunati I-beam Pro Mod rods
Wiseco flat top forged pistons
Dart CNC 227 heads
10.9:1 CR
CompCams XR 292 mech. roller cam (254/260, .622/.628, 110LSA)
Holley single plane
Holley 750 cfm carb
Hooker 1-3/4" headers
That combo made 496 lb-ft@5000 and 571 hp@6900 (crank)
It would probably require 4000 stall TC to get decent launch, but I don't need a drag car.





















