C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

Exhaust Help-I Know, Here We Go Again!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 11:43 PM
  #1  
lostnfoundC4's Avatar
lostnfoundC4
Thread Starter
Pro
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 657
Likes: 1
From: Sykesville Maryland
Default Exhaust Help-I Know, Here We Go Again!

I've been searching the forum and doing a lot of research about what I want and how much I want to spend. Every time I think I'm there, I get a little more confused.
I need to replace everything-currently have swiss cheese and muffler eliminators. Don't have to worry about emissions since it's tagged historic but I do want to maintain stock status but willing to compromise a bit on the exhaust.

I'm looking at a 2.5" front Y (O2 bung with no pre cats) High flow cat and either a Magnaflow cat back or B & B cat back system.
Will eliminating the pre cats mess with the ECM? Will the larger front Y create more heat since I'm tucking more pipe in there or will the added flow rate keep it cooler? Are there noticeable advantages to going 2.5".
Any opinions on cat back systems? I want it toned down from what I have now with the eliminators and still maintain a nice growl. Any resonance issues? Will there be any performance gains in this set up?

I did have a guy tell me that if I go with true dual exhaust and eliminate the cat I'll lose torque on my '86. Can that be true?
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 11:48 PM
  #2  
cwyates4's Avatar
cwyates4
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 1
From: Jasper Texas
Default

Yes, you will lose a little low end torque by going to a true dual setup, but not enough to worry about, especially with a tpi setup. Alot of people don't support the true dual setup here, but I went ahead and did it.

Here is a vid clip of headers straight back to flowmasters for you, with a little engine work.

http://s273.photobucket.com/albums/j...t=100_0621.flv

It is also very quiet in the car while at highway speeds.

Last edited by cwyates4; Jul 25, 2008 at 11:50 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 12:45 PM
  #3  
lostnfoundC4's Avatar
lostnfoundC4
Thread Starter
Pro
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 657
Likes: 1
From: Sykesville Maryland
Default

Thanks-sounds sweet!
Any thoughts on the 2.5" front Y with no pre cats?
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 11:59 PM
  #4  
NT Vettman's Avatar
NT Vettman
Advanced
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: N. Tonawanda NY
Default

I replaced my front Y pipe with a 2 1/2" with no precats and a new high flow main cat. Works great! It runs with less heat because of the front cats being gone. I had a Flow Master cat back system on the car before I replaced the front Y, it sounded better and louder with the new Y. No issues with the ECU and it runs better. With just the exhaust and a new tranny rebuild I had it dynoed, it pulled 236hp at the rear wheels. Factory rates the 90 L98 @ 245 hp. So I would say it helps.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2008 | 12:02 AM
  #5  
cwyates4's Avatar
cwyates4
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 1
From: Jasper Texas
Default

It will help performance a good bit, the exhaust on the L98s were horribly restrictive.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 01:02 PM
  #6  
aklim's Avatar
aklim
Team Owner
Active Streak: 60 Days
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 28,459
Likes: 3,288
From: Hartford WI
Default

I would think that in true duals you will lose some scavenging unless you add some sort of crossover pipe. In any case, why bother? True duals have not shown to be helpful in street applications. Maybe a race application and the ricer effect but I have yet to see a test that proves true duals are better.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 01:33 PM
  #7  
69427's Avatar
69427
Tech Contributor
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,894
Likes: 962
From: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Default

Originally Posted by Japicella
...................?

I did have a guy tell me that if I go with true dual exhaust and eliminate the cat I'll lose torque on my '86. Can that be true?
No. Think about it. If single exhaust and a cat added (or prevented losing) torque, all us pre cat C3 guys would be installing C4 type exhaust systems. It's obvious we don't do that.
Think about how an engine makes power (horsepower or torque, take your pick). It takes cylinder pressure. How do you maximize cylinder pressure? Maximize the amount of fresh air getting into the cylinders, and maximize the amount of exhaust gas you remove from the cylinders. A restrictive single exhaust and cat are not the way to go, as it increases the amount of residual exhaust gas in the cylinder, and thereby reduces the space available in the cylinder to induct more fresh air. To promote increased airflow (and cylinder VE), reduce the exhaust restriction as much as your ears (and community sensibilities) allow.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 02:10 PM
  #8  
aklim's Avatar
aklim
Team Owner
Active Streak: 60 Days
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 28,459
Likes: 3,288
From: Hartford WI
Default

Originally Posted by 69427
To promote increased airflow (and cylinder VE), reduce the exhaust restriction as much as your ears (and community sensibilities) allow.
But if you run true duals, won't you lose some scavenging and thus exhaust restriction?
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 02:10 PM
  #9  
vader86's Avatar
vader86
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 62,153
Likes: 1,731
From: Athens AL
C7 of the Year - Unmodified Finalist 2021
C4 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
Default

I'm looking at a 2.5" front Y (O2 bung with no pre cats) High flow cat and either a Magnaflow cat back or B & B cat back system.

Will eliminating the pre cats mess with the ECM?
No.

Will the larger front Y create more heat since I'm tucking more pipe in there or will the added flow rate keep it cooler?
Likely cooler.

Are there noticeable advantages to going 2.5".
Yes, over stock.

Any opinions on cat back systems?
Based on personal preference alone, you must hear them yourself.

Any resonance issues?
Possibly, depends on what catback you run.

Will there be any performance gains in this set up?
Yes, roughly 10-15hp, depending on what you do exactly, maybe a little more.

I did have a guy tell me that if I go with true dual exhaust and eliminate the cat I'll lose torque on my '86. Can that be true?
You dont lose it, you just move it up in the powerband and you end up with more at peak.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 03:08 PM
  #10  
69427's Avatar
69427
Tech Contributor
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,894
Likes: 962
From: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Default

Originally Posted by aklim
But if you run true duals, won't you lose some scavenging and thus exhaust restriction?
Well, let's look at it step by step. What do the guys who want maximum horsepower/torque do when they are not restricted by DOT or federal laws? They run a tuned length header, with the collector teminating into a large volume, low pressure plenum (in other words, the open atmosphere). Most street cars are not running headers, so any hope of decent scavenging is lost. Additionally, what ever exhaust mass finally gets pushed out of the exhaust manifold and primary downpipe (or header, if equipped), does not get to see a low pressure reception area (such as the open atmosphere). It now has to traverse several feet of tubing, putting up with wall friction (and the attending increases in backpressure) if the pipe is small, and then has to go through the mandatory exhaust cork, also known as a muffler. It is difficult to believe that there is any scavenging going on throughout this tortuous path. In reality, the usual result is just plain ol' backpressure. This can be determined by installing a pressure guage in the downpipe to determine how restrictive the system is. The more restrictive it is, the more crank horsepower gets drained pushing the piston up its exhaust stroke against the backpressure of the exhaust system.
Remember, it's all about pumping air.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2008 | 10:07 AM
  #11  
steve2001sh's Avatar
steve2001sh
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Franklin TN
Default

Originally Posted by Japicella
I did have a guy tell me that if I go with true dual exhaust and eliminate the cat I'll lose torque on my '86. Can that be true?
No, well, not really. Loosing the cats won't hurt you. Going true dual shouldn't. Most people with duels run an x or h pipe. If you don't do that, then a Y might be better.

When he says you'll lose torque, I'll bet he means low end torque. Personally, I don't care much about the low end. In a racing application, I get out of the low end during 1st gear, then never see it again. I want horsepower in the 4-6k rpm range. Also, he's probably referring to the tuning of your exhaust's pressure waves. These waves are complicated, so unless you have your entire system tuned with a specific goal in mind, I expect you won't get much out of these anyway (I'm not saying its not worth it, just that you'll have to really put some thought into it).
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2008 | 10:50 AM
  #12  
John-in-Dallas's Avatar
John-in-Dallas
Heel & Toe
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

I replaced my front Y pipe with a 2 1/2" with no precats and a new high flow main cat. Works great! It runs with less heat because of the front cats being gone. I had a Flow Master cat back system on the car before I replaced the front Y, it sounded better and louder with the new Y. No issues with the ECU and it runs better. With just the exhaust and a new tranny rebuild I had it dynoed, it pulled 236hp at the rear wheels. Factory rates the 90 L98 @ 245 hp. So I would say it helps.
May I ask; what 2.5 inch y-pipe and high flow main cat did you use? And, who did you buy it from? Thanks.

This sounds like one of the best conservative mods there is for the exhaust system.


BTW: Japicella, ALL exhaust threads are interesting!
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 09:55 AM
  #13  
198T7VETTE's Avatar
198T7VETTE
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Default

I wish there were two dyno sheets we could compare for the true duals vs the 2 /1/ 2 exhaust. I'm really stuck in the same mind torture chamber right now. On my mustangs and every other car in the history of the world true duals with an h-pipe or an x-pipe is the way to go. My hot-rodding experience is leaning me this way. BUT......it seems the majority of forum members like the 2 /1/ 2 exhaust. Plus I have never had a car that only likes to rev to 5000 rpms either.....
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 10:04 AM
  #14  
steve2001sh's Avatar
steve2001sh
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Franklin TN
Default

I would assume the duals would win out on most setups. I believe that Vader was just saying that the 2.5 Y would be better than stock. That doesn't mean it is best. That is a small pipe for a vette, even stock.

So, x-pipe is best, but a y is at least better than what you've got.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 11:16 AM
  #15  
aklim's Avatar
aklim
Team Owner
Active Streak: 60 Days
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 28,459
Likes: 3,288
From: Hartford WI
Default

Originally Posted by 198T7VETTE
I wish there were two dyno sheets we could compare for the true duals vs the 2 /1/ 2 exhaust. I'm really stuck in the same mind torture chamber right now. On my mustangs and every other car in the history of the world true duals with an h-pipe or an x-pipe is the way to go. My hot-rodding experience is leaning me this way. BUT......it seems the majority of forum members like the 2 /1/ 2 exhaust. Plus I have never had a car that only likes to rev to 5000 rpms either.....
I ran my car with and without the connectors and I think I lost a few hundreds without the exhaust. The way I ran it was to make a couple of runs on the track with the exhaust connected fully and with it disconnected. I disconnected it BEFORE the "Y". This was in my 91 Firebird on the same motor. Not a whit of improvement. Went backwards actually.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 12:04 PM
  #16  
198T7VETTE's Avatar
198T7VETTE
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by steve2001sh
I would assume the duals would win out on most setups. I believe that Vader was just saying that the 2.5 Y would be better than stock. That doesn't mean it is best. That is a small pipe for a vette, even stock.

So, x-pipe is best, but a y is at least better than what you've got.
Yeah, I mean above all it is still a small block chevy. Every hot chevy since 1955 ran a true dual exhaust. The only thing that has me guessing hot-rodding logic is that the powerband on this car really goes no where. A free flowing exhaust is great for the car that can rev up to 6000-6500 rpms. This car in 90% stock form still only revs to 4800-5000 rpms.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 02:11 PM
  #17  
69427's Avatar
69427
Tech Contributor
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,894
Likes: 962
From: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Default

Originally Posted by 198T7VETTE
Yeah, I mean above all it is still a small block chevy. Every hot chevy since 1955 ran a true dual exhaust. The only thing that has me guessing hot-rodding logic is that the powerband on this car really goes no where. A free flowing exhaust is great for the car that can rev up to 6000-6500 rpms. This car in 90% stock form still only revs to 4800-5000 rpms.
The benefits of a free flowing exhaust do not magically appear at 6000 RPM. You benefit at all loads and RPMs with a low backpressure exhaust. Other than a reduction of NOx, there's no real performance benefit to having residual exhaust gas remaining in the cylinder, not to mention having the engine work harder to push out the burned exhaust gas against the restriction of a small exhaust pipe.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Exhaust Help-I Know, Here We Go Again!

Old Aug 5, 2008 | 02:18 PM
  #18  
aklim's Avatar
aklim
Team Owner
Active Streak: 60 Days
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 28,459
Likes: 3,288
From: Hartford WI
Default

Originally Posted by 69427
The benefits of a free flowing exhaust do not magically appear at 6000 RPM. You benefit at all loads and RPMs with a low backpressure exhaust. Other than a reduction of NOx, there's no real performance benefit to having residual exhaust gas remaining in the cylinder, not to mention having the engine work harder to push out the burned exhaust gas against the restriction of a small exhaust pipe.
Lets say there are benefits, what is the benefit amounts? Even if there is a benefit but it is say a 0.1% improvement, is it worth it to lose ground clearance and what not?
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 02:36 PM
  #19  
TJM's Avatar
TJM
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
From: Suwanee,Ga
Default

Originally Posted by Japicella
I've been searching the forum and doing a lot of research about what I want and how much I want to spend. Every time I think I'm there, I get a little more confused.
I need to replace everything-currently have swiss cheese and muffler eliminators. Don't have to worry about emissions since it's tagged historic but I do want to maintain stock status but willing to compromise a bit on the exhaust.

I'm looking at a 2.5" front Y (O2 bung with no pre cats) High flow cat and either a Magnaflow cat back or B & B cat back system.
Will eliminating the pre cats mess with the ECM? Will the larger front Y create more heat since I'm tucking more pipe in there or will the added flow rate keep it cooler? Are there noticeable advantages to going 2.5".
Any opinions on cat back systems? I want it toned down from what I have now with the eliminators and still maintain a nice growl. Any resonance issues? Will there be any performance gains in this set up?

I did have a guy tell me that if I go with true dual exhaust and eliminate the cat I'll lose torque on my '86. Can that be true?


I replaced the 2-1/4" [w/ pre-cats] on my '89 years ago and went with a Hi Flow cat. My emission numbers IMPROVED!!!

[ added a chip and they improved again, go figure?].

I didn't measure heat but the pre-cats are assumed to add more under hood heat [ their intended function results in just that].

The tone was lower and more mellow, as well.

I would say it is an overall positive thing.

TJM
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 02:49 PM
  #20  
pearlvett's Avatar
pearlvett
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
From: Bulverde TX
Default

All sounds pretty good but lets take a look at the pros do to get max power. Largest pipe that you can use without losing to back pressure and an "X" pipe with free flow exhaust after the X pipe if your are the law following type a good free flowing muffler is in order. If the laws do not apply to you forget the muffler.

Oh yea I have 2.5 from front to back with x pipe and cheap mufflers sound pretty good NO CATS

Last edited by pearlvett; Aug 5, 2008 at 02:55 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:26 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 11:09:53


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE