When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
A couple of the specs copied directly from Hot cam spec page
GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS
Part Number: 24502586
Engine Application: SBC - Gen 1, Gen1E, and Gen 2 1986 to present.
Lifter Type: Hydraulic Roller
Engine RPM Range: 1500-5500
What a cam will pull to (provide power to) is not the same as it's optimum operating range.
A couple of the specs copied directly from Hot cam spec page
GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS
Part Number: 24502586
Engine Application: SBC - Gen 1, Gen1E, and Gen 2 1986 to present.
Lifter Type: Hydraulic Roller
Engine RPM Range: 1500-5500
What a cam will pull to (provide power to) is not the same as it's optimum operating range.
My mistake ,you are right
...but that's the same operating range as the ZZ4
how strange !!!
why they both have the same O.R. ?
Usually aftermarket heads requires .100" longer pushrods.
On my engine (made with pride by Pete K) the pushrods are 7.400 due to the fact that the cam is a small base circle cam.
On the 388 CID I built, using Bret Bauer ported AFR 190s, I needed to go with 7.550s. There were several variables involved in that; valves, reduced base circle cam, valve spring installed height, Crane retainers, etc.
I used an adjustable pushrod to establish the correct length and followed CompCams instructions for determining the correct length. That consists of monitoring the in-board, center, out-board, center, in-board movement of the roller rocker tip.
There are quite a number of engine builders who will say the CompCams method is not the way to do it. They refer the mid-lift theory. It transfers the profile of the cam to the valve a lot better. I will be using the mid-lift theory.
Tried your mom's d@#$chebag but it just ate straight through thorugh the aluminum and left me with the same thing that ran down her leg after your conception.
You've been a member for a WHOLE MONTH, keep you @#$#$@%% opinions to youself unless they're useful, which I doubt anything you have to say is. F----'n NOOB
Last edited by ultraviolet70; Oct 15, 2008 at 01:40 AM.
There are quite a number of engine builders who will say the CompCams method is not the way to do it. They refer the mid-lift theory. It transfers the profile of the cam to the valve a lot better. I will be using the mid-lift theory.
There's seldom, if ever, universal agreement on any of these issues. When confronted with conflicting views, I opt to go with the leader in that field and, as in this case, it's valvetrain technology. Even Harvey Crane acknowledged in a magazine interview that CompCams is the leader.
Best I can do is pass it along; take it or leave it.
Tried your mom's d@#$chebag but it just ate straight through thorugh the aluminum and left me with the same thing that ran down her leg after your conception.
You've been a member for a WHOLE MONTH, keep you @#$#$@%% opinions to youself unless they're useful, which I doubt anything you have to say is. F----'n NOOB
basically what i thought as well. i looked at those pictures and am of the opinion that it will flow better than stock. any improvement is just that, improvement, not something to make a cheap attempt at humor. we don't really know how the hand file comment was meant though, it could have been in jest. i've been known to say wild stuff like that around the shop. as to the pushrods measuring small base circle cams or longer valves is a great idea. my post before about the common 7.150 and 7.200 lengths is only for roller blocks with stock base circle cams and stock length valves. which brings up another point, it isn't aftermarket heads that create pushrod issues {provided they are 23deg} it's the valves. changes in valve length ALWAYS effect pushrod length.
Tried your mom's d@#$chebag but it just ate straight through thorugh the aluminum and left me with the same thing that ran down her leg after your conception.