When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
C4 L98 1990.
Replaced my shorted Multecs with Bosch 0280150561-D9B back in 2005. Suffered an actual MPG drop of 25 % since then. I first suspected compression, o2, cats, egr, but all seems ok after checking. Plugs look great and no soot in the tailpipes. When I listen carefully to the engine at light load, cruising, I can feel/hear a very slight stumbling/misfire. Most people wouldn't notice it. One thought is that unburnt oxygen forces BLM to rise. Acceleration and idle is ok. Could it be anything with spray pattern? I havn't tried new Multecs because of the price but there's soon not much left to try. Has anyone seen this kind of problem and tried swapping back to good Multecs? I would appreciate info about the result before buying new OEMs.
Buy a set of the Bosch III injectors from supporting Vendor FICINJECTORS AKA: Jon Banner
Check out the injector videos at the top of the page shot by Jon. Many members have bought these new style injectors including me and have had Great results! These are the Best value replacement injectors for the L98. At only $169 a set, they can't be beat.
From: One day you're a Comet...the next day you're dust... Arkansas
Originally Posted by L98
C4 L98 1990.
Replaced my shorted Multecs with Bosch 0280150561-D9B back in 2005. Suffered an actual MPG drop of 25 % since then. I first suspected compression, o2, cats, egr, but all seems ok after checking. Plugs look great and no soot in the tailpipes. When I listen carefully to the engine at light load, cruising, I can feel/hear a very slight stumbling/misfire. Most people wouldn't notice it. One thought is that unburnt oxygen forces BLM to rise. Acceleration and idle is ok. Could it be anything with spray pattern? I havn't tried new Multecs because of the price but there's soon not much left to try. Has anyone seen this kind of problem and tried swapping back to good Multecs? I would appreciate info about the result before buying new OEMs.
I like my Multecs and will keep them as long as I can. Do you have Bosch II injectors? I don't have the part numbers. What is the fuel lbs rating on them. You may have 24 lb, stock is about 22 lb. The Ford injectors are sometimes rated at a different fuel pressure as well.
I like my Multecs and will keep them as long as I can. Do you have Bosch II injectors? I don't have the part numbers. What is the fuel lbs rating on them. You may have 24 lb, stock is about 22 lb. The Ford injectors are sometimes rated at a different fuel pressure as well.
I was thinking the same, injectors could be bigger than stock. Do you have an adjustable regulator?
Are you measuring MPG by the trip computer or manually by recording miles & gallons at fill-ups? If your bosch injectors flow different at GM fuel pressures than stock multecs, the computer will think it's injecting more or less fuel and throw off the trip computer.
C4 L98 1990.
Replaced my shorted Multecs with Bosch 0280150561-D9B back in 2005. Suffered an actual MPG drop of 25 % since then. I first suspected compression, o2, cats, egr, but all seems ok after checking. Plugs look great and no soot in the tailpipes. When I listen carefully to the engine at light load, cruising, I can feel/hear a very slight stumbling/misfire. Most people wouldn't notice it. One thought is that unburnt oxygen forces BLM to rise. Acceleration and idle is ok. Could it be anything with spray pattern? I havn't tried new Multecs because of the price but there's soon not much left to try. Has anyone seen this kind of problem and tried swapping back to good Multecs? I would appreciate info about the result before buying new OEMs.
the injector you have is a ford pink top 22's. used primarilly in ford trucks. They are a little slower than the multecs and we do not sell them for the c4 because we favor the Bosch 3 which as far as I can tell has the same offset and flow rate at low pulse values as the multec. The spray pattern of the 22 is a wide cone, the multec has a narrow cone, the Bosch 3 has a narrow cone atomized at the tip. Watch the videos. All 3 are compared. The multec is not alcohol compliant nor is the pink top
I don't know if it is your injectors, but when I read your post I thought plug wires. I advise talking with Jon. He helped me with mine, which was both wires and injectors. Good luck.
C4 L98 1990.
I would appreciate info about the result before buying new OEMs.
This summer I unhappily discovered that although my 1990 L98 would consistently start and run reliably, after the engine got hot and I shut it off, it would not re-start.
It would crank but not run.
Multec 1 injectors (PN 17086544) were used in Corvettes from 1989 through 1999. High alcohol content fuels and cleaners are known to erode the insulation on the injector coils, leading to a failure. To make a long story short, on my car the injector 2 coil failed when it got hot and prevented the engine from starting.
If you search this forum, you will find many posts by people who have replaced original Multec injectors with Bosch Design III injectors, part number 0-280-155-700.
If you look closely, you can see the part number on the side:
Bosch also produces an identical injector for Ford under part number F4SE-A1B. I replaced the stock Multecs in my Corvette with Ford F4SE-A1B’s.
An original Multec next to the Ford F4SE-A1B
A close-up of the part number: F4SE-A1B:
According to Injector Flow Rate tables on the Internet ( http://users.erols.com/srweiss/tableifc.htm ), stock Multec injectors, sometimes called 22 lb. injectors, flow 235.9 cc/min @ 43.5 psi. Ford/Bosch replacement injectors, sometimes called 19 lb. injectors, flow 226 cc/min @ 43.5 psi, although this seems to depend on who is doing the measuring.
I can't tell you about every inj. as Jon has, but what I can tell you is @2k rpm and at 38 kpa (will be 40 map value in tuning) you are lean, and quite possibly why you feel some "stumbling" in that rpm/map area. BLM of 139 is not changing because there is not enough fuel added in that cell, hence why the int. shows 131 (is not adding enough fuel to bring the bl's in line). If that cell (map vs rpm) in the upper VE table had enough fuel to comp. it the int. value would look more like 120ish. More than likely, there a few places (aside from what is posted) in the tune that are either rich or lean, and that 139 blm may be starting earlier on accel/decell (you will need to look it over frame by frame w/datamaster or the like).
The 90-91 map cars are more sensitive across the board to changes, which does have an effect on fueling through out the load range vs rpm.
Also, is the 14* @idle w/est dis-connected ?
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.