When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I got a question about my car (bought it 1 year ago). Bare with me because I'm no corvette expert...1 year rookie.
I've got a 64 convertible..resto-mod. 418 HP ZZ4 EFI engine, with a level 3 Gear Star 4L60 trany, and a 82 vette aluminum rearend. Front suspension has the VBP performance Plus package, and on the back I have their dual mount mono-spring. Shocks are Koni Classic gas adustables on front and Delco gas on back.
So here's my question.....
> Is there a big difference between my 82 rearend/suspension and a C4? Visibly, they look similar.
My car was done 14 years ago. Today, a C2 resto mod would normally have C4 (or some with C5) suspension with an aftermarket frame. I've got somewhat of an hybrid. I'm really trying to understand what I've got.
> Is there a big difference between my 82 rearend/suspension and a C4? Visibly, they look similar.
nothing is the same c3 vs c4...your 82 third member is a 63 rear with some alum pieces substituted, c4 gears came from the same supplier but all else was new ideas...look closer and take a few measurements ( "yardstick" accuracy will suffice ), you'll walk away mumbling "not even close"
[QUOTE=CWerner;1568475647]
trying to improve the ridability as we speak. A little bouncy, but I have made some improvements.
[/QUOTE
trash the rear delcos and put on konis...set 'em in the softest position...will handle AND ride a bunch better (found this back/day when road racing/street driving mid-years)...btw, looks like you're very "in the range", the mid-year roadster with its windshield still on will get "light" in the back at speeds over 120 mph, downright "squirrelly" at 140, need a wide track and minimal crosswind to play
[QUOTE=redrose;1568475536]nothing is the same c3 vs c4...your 82 third member is a 63 rear with some alum pieces substituted,
BS.
The 80 - 82 rear ends had Dana internals. Like the 84-96, the model Dana differed depending on whether it came with a manual or automatic trans. The 80-81 manuals had Dana 44's, same as the manual 84-96.
Okay....my conclusion is that my 82 rearend is an improvement over the stock C2. How much is debatable, but it is better.
Doesn't come close to comparing with the C4, though. I clearly got that in the pics.
the c4 is prettier, maybe...big advantage of the stock c4 vs stock c3 rear is that the c4 will incur less camber gain during "squat" when power is applied, maintaining better "wide" tire contact with the road ...dropping" the inner pivots of the lower struts on the c3 rear (bracket mod) can help tire patch by herds, slight attention to reduced ground clearance is advised, unhook the spring end bolt and jack the tire up to the bump stop and check tire/fender clearance...your "somewhat altered" rear (per your pic ?) may already have this "pivot drop" incorporated...if ultimate strength is a concern, "backdate" to an earlier iron case c3 diff but have it modded to use GM "12 bolt rear" guts (several west coast rear end shops do that mod) and upgrade the c3 stub-shafts.
IMHO, change from the c3 to a c4 rear is not warranted...the c4 FRONT suspension, however, is a substantial jump from the "58 bel-aire" front suspension that carried over to mids/c3's, and would be of interest.
If you enjoy handling more than cruising then you will not believe the difference that a 5 link will make. I raced c3's in the 70's and 80's and
after driving a trailing link car 10-10ths you soon learn how poorly this thing was designed! The torque forces are fed through the suspension which is why the car squats when you put it in gear and under acceleration. Toe control by todays standards is nonexistant, that's why you experience trailing throttle oversteer when you lift off the throttle in a corner. I was so fascinated by the 5 link in the Greenwood cars I designed my own and installed it in my 80 street/track car. The transformation is trully unbeliveable. Too bad a mid 70s Bob Riley design took 10 years to make it to the street. If all you want is a nice ride than it would be a waste of time and money. Hope this helps a little and I really like your mid year